Brief Report: Real-World Eligibility for Clinical Trials in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC at a Tertiary Care Center

IF 3 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Navdeep Dehar M.B.B.S., MD, MBT, FRCPC , Mahbuba Meem MD , Ishita Aggarwal MD, MPH , Wilma Hopman MA , Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau MD, PhD, MPs, FRCPC , Andrew Robinson MD, MSc, FRCPC , Andrea S. Fung MD, PhD
{"title":"Brief Report: Real-World Eligibility for Clinical Trials in Patients With Extensive-Stage SCLC at a Tertiary Care Center","authors":"Navdeep Dehar M.B.B.S., MD, MBT, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Mahbuba Meem MD ,&nbsp;Ishita Aggarwal MD, MPH ,&nbsp;Wilma Hopman MA ,&nbsp;Pierre-Olivier Gaudreau MD, PhD, MPs, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Andrew Robinson MD, MSc, FRCPC ,&nbsp;Andrea S. Fung MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>The CASPIAN and IMpower133 trials revealed a significant survival benefit of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. The current study characterizes the proportion of real-world patients who would have met eligibility for these trials and highlights factors influencing eligibility in the real-world setting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of patient data was conducted for stage IV patients with SCLC treated at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada. Trial eligibility was based on criteria used in the IMpower133 and CASPIAN trials. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of the 116 patients included, only 12.1% met the overall eligibility criteria for the IMpower133 trial, and 14.7% for the CASPIAN trial. The most common reasons for ineligibility included: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2 or greater (77.5%), inadequate organ function (48%), and the presence of brain metastases at diagnosis (37.3%). Sixty-one patients (59.8%) met two or more major ineligibility criteria. If trial eligibility was expanded to include ECOG 2 patients, an additional 10.3% would have met eligibility. The median overall survival for all-comers was 6.5 months.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Only a small minority of real-world patients with extensive-stage SCLC would have met eligibility for the IMpower133 and CASPIAN trials, with ECOG greater than or equal to 2, inadequate organ function, and brain metastases comprising the most common reasons for trial ineligibility. Future clinical trials should expand the inclusion criteria to better represent real-world patient populations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17675,"journal":{"name":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","volume":"5 7","pages":"Article 100696"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000663/pdfft?md5=248c51a4b146492282fa8661f7951747&pid=1-s2.0-S2666364324000663-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JTO Clinical and Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666364324000663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The CASPIAN and IMpower133 trials revealed a significant survival benefit of chemotherapy plus immunotherapy in patients with extensive-stage SCLC. The current study characterizes the proportion of real-world patients who would have met eligibility for these trials and highlights factors influencing eligibility in the real-world setting.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patient data was conducted for stage IV patients with SCLC treated at the Cancer Centre of Southeastern Ontario, Canada. Trial eligibility was based on criteria used in the IMpower133 and CASPIAN trials. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Of the 116 patients included, only 12.1% met the overall eligibility criteria for the IMpower133 trial, and 14.7% for the CASPIAN trial. The most common reasons for ineligibility included: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) 2 or greater (77.5%), inadequate organ function (48%), and the presence of brain metastases at diagnosis (37.3%). Sixty-one patients (59.8%) met two or more major ineligibility criteria. If trial eligibility was expanded to include ECOG 2 patients, an additional 10.3% would have met eligibility. The median overall survival for all-comers was 6.5 months.

Conclusions

Only a small minority of real-world patients with extensive-stage SCLC would have met eligibility for the IMpower133 and CASPIAN trials, with ECOG greater than or equal to 2, inadequate organ function, and brain metastases comprising the most common reasons for trial ineligibility. Future clinical trials should expand the inclusion criteria to better represent real-world patient populations.

简要报告:一家三级医疗中心的极重度SCLC患者参加临床试验的实际情况
导言CASPIAN和IMpower133试验显示,化疗加免疫疗法对广泛期SCLC患者有显著的生存获益。本研究描述了现实世界中符合这些试验资格的患者比例,并强调了在现实世界环境中影响试验资格的因素。方法对加拿大安大略东南部癌症中心治疗的IV期SCLC患者数据进行了回顾性分析。试验资格基于IMpower133和CASPIAN试验中使用的标准。数据采用描述性统计进行总结。结果 在纳入的116名患者中,只有12.1%符合IMpower133试验的总体资格标准,14.7%符合CASPIAN试验的资格标准。不符合条件的最常见原因包括东部合作肿瘤学组(ECOG)2级或以上(77.5%)、器官功能不全(48%)和确诊时存在脑转移(37.3%)。61名患者(59.8%)符合两个或两个以上的主要不合格标准。如果将试验资格扩大到包括 ECOG 2 患者,将有另外 10.3% 的患者符合试验资格。结论现实世界中只有少数广泛期SCLC患者符合IMpower133和CASPIAN试验的资格,ECOG大于或等于2、器官功能不全和脑转移是不符合试验资格的最常见原因。未来的临床试验应扩大纳入标准,以更好地代表现实世界中的患者群体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
145
审稿时长
19 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信