Improving Spontaneous Breathing Trials With a Respiratory Therapist-Driven Protocol

Christopher A. Linke RN, MHI, CSSBB , Jenna L. Potter DNP, ACNP , Alissa Pool DNP , Lindsay Berger RRT , Frew Mekuria RRT , Melissa Olson RRT-ACCS, MHA , Tyan Thomas RRT , Kathryn M. Pendleton MD
{"title":"Improving Spontaneous Breathing Trials With a Respiratory Therapist-Driven Protocol","authors":"Christopher A. Linke RN, MHI, CSSBB ,&nbsp;Jenna L. Potter DNP, ACNP ,&nbsp;Alissa Pool DNP ,&nbsp;Lindsay Berger RRT ,&nbsp;Frew Mekuria RRT ,&nbsp;Melissa Olson RRT-ACCS, MHA ,&nbsp;Tyan Thomas RRT ,&nbsp;Kathryn M. Pendleton MD","doi":"10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Respiratory therapist (RT)-driven spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) protocols have been shown to improve patient outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Research Question</h3><p>Can an RT-driven SBT protocol be implemented and sustained to improve outcomes?</p></div><div><h3>Study Design and Methods</h3><p>This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to standardize and re-establish RT-driven protocol for screening patients for SBT readiness and administering SBTs to appropriate patients. Endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to an academic medical center ICU were screened daily by RTs for SBT readiness. Eligible patients received an SBT with extubation decisions made by the physician team. Patient demographics, indications for intubation, SBT eligibility and exclusionary indications, SBT ventilator settings, start times, duration, and outcomes were collected from the electronic health record. QI interventions included staff re-education, documentation tips, creation of process maps, and interdisciplinary open forum discussions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>One hundred twenty-eight patients representing 759 safety screen weaning assessment opportunities were included over a baseline sample and three plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. Documentation of SBT eligibility increased from 25% at baseline to 86% in PDSA cycle 3 (<em>P</em> ≤ .001). Patients assessed to be eligible for and who received an SBT constituted 42% at baseline, 35% at PDSA cycle 1, 36% at PDSA cycle 2, and 51% at PDSA cycle 3 (<em>P</em> = .092). Use of the protocolized SBT ventilator settings improved significantly from 18% to 83% (<em>P</em> ≤ .001). Patients who started an SBT before 9 <span>am</span> increased from 41% to 67% (<em>P</em> = .097), and the median duration of SBT decreased from 211 to 64 min (<em>P</em> = .008).</p></div><div><h3>Interpretation</h3><p>This study shows that standardization of an RT-driven SBT protocol is feasible despite multiple obstacles, including staffing and communication challenges and poor shared understanding of terminology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93934,"journal":{"name":"CHEST critical care","volume":"2 3","pages":"Article 100085"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978842400039X/pdfft?md5=1faa96b3f6fcd86090bf43c87789509b&pid=1-s2.0-S294978842400039X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CHEST critical care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294978842400039X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Respiratory therapist (RT)-driven spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) protocols have been shown to improve patient outcomes.

Research Question

Can an RT-driven SBT protocol be implemented and sustained to improve outcomes?

Study Design and Methods

This quality improvement (QI) project aimed to standardize and re-establish RT-driven protocol for screening patients for SBT readiness and administering SBTs to appropriate patients. Endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients admitted to an academic medical center ICU were screened daily by RTs for SBT readiness. Eligible patients received an SBT with extubation decisions made by the physician team. Patient demographics, indications for intubation, SBT eligibility and exclusionary indications, SBT ventilator settings, start times, duration, and outcomes were collected from the electronic health record. QI interventions included staff re-education, documentation tips, creation of process maps, and interdisciplinary open forum discussions.

Results

One hundred twenty-eight patients representing 759 safety screen weaning assessment opportunities were included over a baseline sample and three plan-do-study-act (PDSA) cycles. Documentation of SBT eligibility increased from 25% at baseline to 86% in PDSA cycle 3 (P ≤ .001). Patients assessed to be eligible for and who received an SBT constituted 42% at baseline, 35% at PDSA cycle 1, 36% at PDSA cycle 2, and 51% at PDSA cycle 3 (P = .092). Use of the protocolized SBT ventilator settings improved significantly from 18% to 83% (P ≤ .001). Patients who started an SBT before 9 am increased from 41% to 67% (P = .097), and the median duration of SBT decreased from 211 to 64 min (P = .008).

Interpretation

This study shows that standardization of an RT-driven SBT protocol is feasible despite multiple obstacles, including staffing and communication challenges and poor shared understanding of terminology.

用呼吸治疗师驱动的方案改进自主呼吸试验
背景呼吸治疗师(RT)驱动的自主呼吸试验(SBT)方案已被证明可以改善患者的预后。研究问题能否实施并维持由 RT 驱动的 SBT 方案以改善预后? 研究设计和方法该质量改进(QI)项目旨在规范和重建由 RT 驱动的筛选患者是否准备好 SBT 并为合适的患者实施 SBT 的方案。一家学术医疗中心重症监护室收治的气管插管和机械通气成人患者每天都由 RT 筛选是否准备好进行 SBT。符合条件的患者接受 SBT,由医生团队决定是否拔管。电子病历收集了患者的人口统计学资料、插管指征、SBT 资格和排除指征、SBT 呼吸机设置、开始时间、持续时间和结果。QI 干预措施包括员工再教育、记录提示、创建流程图和跨学科开放论坛讨论。结果 在基线样本和三个计划-实施-研究-行动 (PDSA) 周期中,纳入了 128 名患者,代表 759 次安全筛查断奶评估机会。符合 SBT 条件的文件从基线的 25% 增加到 PDSA 周期 3 的 86%(P ≤ .001)。经评估符合 SBT 条件并接受 SBT 的患者在基线时占 42%,在 PDSA 周期 1 时占 35%,在 PDSA 周期 2 时占 36%,在 PDSA 周期 3 时占 51%(P = .092)。规范化 SBT 呼吸机设置的使用率从 18% 显著提高到 83%(P ≤ .001)。在上午 9 点之前开始 SBT 的患者从 41% 增加到 67%(P = .097),SBT 的中位持续时间从 211 分钟减少到 64 分钟(P = .008)。这项研究表明,尽管存在多种障碍,包括人员配备和沟通方面的挑战以及对术语的理解不一致,但 RT 驱动的 SBT 协议标准化是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CHEST critical care
CHEST critical care Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信