Enhancing Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Artificial intelligence-Driven Virtual Biopsy for Optimal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Approach and Gleason Grading Strategy

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 PATHOLOGY
Christian Harder , Alexey Pryalukhin , Alexander Quaas , Marie-Lisa Eich , Maria Tretiakova , Sebastian Klein , Alexander Seper , Axel Heidenreich , George Jabboure Netto , Wolfgang Hulla , Reinhard Büttner , Kasia Bozek , Yuri Tolkach
{"title":"Enhancing Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Artificial intelligence-Driven Virtual Biopsy for Optimal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy Approach and Gleason Grading Strategy","authors":"Christian Harder ,&nbsp;Alexey Pryalukhin ,&nbsp;Alexander Quaas ,&nbsp;Marie-Lisa Eich ,&nbsp;Maria Tretiakova ,&nbsp;Sebastian Klein ,&nbsp;Alexander Seper ,&nbsp;Axel Heidenreich ,&nbsp;George Jabboure Netto ,&nbsp;Wolfgang Hulla ,&nbsp;Reinhard Büttner ,&nbsp;Kasia Bozek ,&nbsp;Yuri Tolkach","doi":"10.1016/j.modpat.2024.100564","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>An optimal approach to magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) remains unclear (number of cores, intercore distance, Gleason grading [GG] principle). The aim of this study was to develop a precise pixel-wise segmentation diagnostic artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for tumor detection and GG as well as an algorithm for virtual prostate biopsy that are used together to systematically investigate and find an optimal approach to targeted PBx. Pixel-wise AI algorithms for tumor detection and GG were developed using a high-quality, manually annotated data set (slides n = 442) after fast-track annotation transfer into segmentation style. To this end, a virtual biopsy algorithm was developed that can perform random biopsies from tumor regions in whole-mount whole-slide images with predefined parameters. A cohort of 115 radical prostatectomy (RP) patient cases with clinically significant, magnetic resonance imaging-visible tumors (n = 121) was used for systematic studies of the optimal biopsy approach. Three expert genitourinary (GU) pathologists (Y.T., A.P., A.Q.) participated in the validation. The tumor detection algorithm (aware version sensitivity/specificity 0.99/0.90, balanced version 0.97/0.97) and GG algorithm (quadratic kappa range vs pathologists 0.77-0.78) perform on par with expert GU pathologists. In total, 65,340 virtual biopsies were performed to study different biopsy approaches with the following results: (1) 4 biopsy cores is the optimal number for a targeted PBx, (2) cumulative GG strategy is superior to using maximal Gleason score for single cores, (3) controlling for minimal intercore distance does not improve the predictive accuracy for the RP Gleason score, (4) using tertiary Gleason pattern principle (for AI tool) in cumulative GG strategy might allow better predictions of final RP Gleason score. The AI algorithm (based on cumulative GG strategy) predicted the RP Gleason score of the tumor better than 2 of the 3 expert GU pathologists. In this study, using an original approach of virtual prostate biopsy on the real cohort of patient cases, we find the optimal approach to the biopsy procedure and the subsequent GG of a targeted PBx. We publicly release 2 large data sets with associated expert pathologists’ GG and our virtual biopsy algorithm.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18706,"journal":{"name":"Modern Pathology","volume":"37 10","pages":"Article 100564"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893395224001443/pdfft?md5=0f4b4a77b04b588b9e6833ca66915ca0&pid=1-s2.0-S0893395224001443-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0893395224001443","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An optimal approach to magnetic resonance imaging fusion targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) remains unclear (number of cores, intercore distance, Gleason grading [GG] principle). The aim of this study was to develop a precise pixel-wise segmentation diagnostic artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for tumor detection and GG as well as an algorithm for virtual prostate biopsy that are used together to systematically investigate and find an optimal approach to targeted PBx. Pixel-wise AI algorithms for tumor detection and GG were developed using a high-quality, manually annotated data set (slides n = 442) after fast-track annotation transfer into segmentation style. To this end, a virtual biopsy algorithm was developed that can perform random biopsies from tumor regions in whole-mount whole-slide images with predefined parameters. A cohort of 115 radical prostatectomy (RP) patient cases with clinically significant, magnetic resonance imaging-visible tumors (n = 121) was used for systematic studies of the optimal biopsy approach. Three expert genitourinary (GU) pathologists (Y.T., A.P., A.Q.) participated in the validation. The tumor detection algorithm (aware version sensitivity/specificity 0.99/0.90, balanced version 0.97/0.97) and GG algorithm (quadratic kappa range vs pathologists 0.77-0.78) perform on par with expert GU pathologists. In total, 65,340 virtual biopsies were performed to study different biopsy approaches with the following results: (1) 4 biopsy cores is the optimal number for a targeted PBx, (2) cumulative GG strategy is superior to using maximal Gleason score for single cores, (3) controlling for minimal intercore distance does not improve the predictive accuracy for the RP Gleason score, (4) using tertiary Gleason pattern principle (for AI tool) in cumulative GG strategy might allow better predictions of final RP Gleason score. The AI algorithm (based on cumulative GG strategy) predicted the RP Gleason score of the tumor better than 2 of the 3 expert GU pathologists. In this study, using an original approach of virtual prostate biopsy on the real cohort of patient cases, we find the optimal approach to the biopsy procedure and the subsequent GG of a targeted PBx. We publicly release 2 large data sets with associated expert pathologists’ GG and our virtual biopsy algorithm.

增强前列腺癌诊断:人工智能驱动的虚拟活检以优化 MRI 靶向活检方法和格里森分级策略。
磁共振成像融合靶向前列腺活检(PBx)的最佳方法(核数、核间距离、格里森分级(GG)原则)仍不明确。本研究旨在开发一种用于肿瘤检测和 GG 的精确像素分割诊断人工智能算法,以及一种用于虚拟前列腺活检的算法,并将其结合使用,以系统地研究和找到靶向前列腺活检的最佳方法。用于肿瘤检测和GG的像素化人工智能算法是利用高质量人工标注数据集(幻灯片n=442),经过快速标注转为分割风格后开发的。为此,我们开发了一种虚拟活检算法,该算法可在整张切片图像中根据预定义参数对肿瘤区域进行随机活检。在对最佳活检方法进行系统研究时,使用了一组 115 例前列腺癌根治术(RP)患者病例(n=121),这些病例均有临床意义,且 MRI 可见肿瘤。三位泌尿生殖(GU)病理专家参与了验证。肿瘤检测算法(感知版灵敏度/特异性为0.99/0.90,平衡版为0.97/0.97)和GG算法(与病理学家的二次卡帕范围为0.77-0.78)与泌尿科病理专家的表现相当。为研究不同的活检方法,共进行了 65,340 例虚拟活检,结果如下:1)4 个活检核是靶向 PBx 的最佳数量;2)累积 GG 策略优于使用单核最大格雷欣评分;3)控制最小核间距离并不能提高 RP 格雷欣评分的预测准确性;4)在累积 GG 策略中使用三级格雷欣模式原则(用于人工智能工具)可能会更好地预测最终的 RP 格雷欣评分。基于累积 GG 策略的人工智能算法对肿瘤 RP 格莱森评分的预测结果优于 3 位 GU 病理专家中的 2 位。在这项研究中,我们在真实病例群中使用了一种独创的虚拟前列腺活检方法,找到了活检过程的最佳方法以及随后对靶向前列腺增生症进行的格里森分级。我们公开发布了两个大型数据集,其中包括相关病理专家的 GG 和我们的虚拟活检算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Modern Pathology
Modern Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
14.30
自引率
2.70%
发文量
174
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Modern Pathology, an international journal under the ownership of The United States & Canadian Academy of Pathology (USCAP), serves as an authoritative platform for publishing top-tier clinical and translational research studies in pathology. Original manuscripts are the primary focus of Modern Pathology, complemented by impactful editorials, reviews, and practice guidelines covering all facets of precision diagnostics in human pathology. The journal's scope includes advancements in molecular diagnostics and genomic classifications of diseases, breakthroughs in immune-oncology, computational science, applied bioinformatics, and digital pathology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信