Abortion Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents at Four Midwestern Residency Programs Prior to Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health.
Abigail S Cutler, Elise S Cowley, Jessika A Ralph, Jessie Chen, Amy Godecker, Jordan Ward, Sarah Hutto, Laura Jacques
{"title":"Abortion Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents at Four Midwestern Residency Programs Prior to <i>Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health</i>.","authors":"Abigail S Cutler, Elise S Cowley, Jessika A Ralph, Jessie Chen, Amy Godecker, Jordan Ward, Sarah Hutto, Laura Jacques","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in <i>Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization</i> to overturn <i>Roe v Wade</i>. As a result, half of US states now face proposed or in-effect abortion bans, which affect the ability of obstetrics and gynecology (ObGyn) residency programs to provide abortion training. We sought to establish ObGyn residents' pre-<i>Dobbs</i> attitudes toward abortion, desire to learn about abortion, and intentions about providing abortion care in their future practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January through December 2021, we surveyed 70 ObGyn residents at 4 programs in Wisconsin and Minnesota to assess their attitudes toward abortion, desire to learn about abortion, and intentions about providing abortion care in their future practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) ObGyn residents completed the survey. Most reported highly favorable attitudes toward abortion, nearly all found the issue of abortion important, and the majority planned to incorporate abortion care into their future work. There were no differences in median attitude scores or behavioral intentions among institutions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Prior to the <i>Dobbs</i> decision, ObGyn residents in Minnesota and Wisconsin viewed abortion as important health care and intended to provide this care after graduation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: In June 2022, the United States Supreme Court announced its decision in Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization to overturn Roe v Wade. As a result, half of US states now face proposed or in-effect abortion bans, which affect the ability of obstetrics and gynecology (ObGyn) residency programs to provide abortion training. We sought to establish ObGyn residents' pre-Dobbs attitudes toward abortion, desire to learn about abortion, and intentions about providing abortion care in their future practice.
Methods: From January through December 2021, we surveyed 70 ObGyn residents at 4 programs in Wisconsin and Minnesota to assess their attitudes toward abortion, desire to learn about abortion, and intentions about providing abortion care in their future practice.
Results: Fifty-five out of 70 (79%) ObGyn residents completed the survey. Most reported highly favorable attitudes toward abortion, nearly all found the issue of abortion important, and the majority planned to incorporate abortion care into their future work. There were no differences in median attitude scores or behavioral intentions among institutions.
Conclusions: Prior to the Dobbs decision, ObGyn residents in Minnesota and Wisconsin viewed abortion as important health care and intended to provide this care after graduation.
在多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康案之前,美国中西部四个住院医师培训项目的妇产科住院医师对堕胎的态度和行为意向》(Abortion Attitudes and Behavior Intentions of Obstetrics and Gynecology Residents at Four Midwestern Residency Programs prior to Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health.
导言:2022 年 6 月,美国最高法院在 "多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案"(Dobbs v Jackson Women's Health Organization)中宣布推翻 "罗伊诉韦德案"(Roe v Wade)。因此,现在美国有一半的州面临着拟议中或生效的堕胎禁令,这影响了妇产科住院医师项目提供堕胎培训的能力。我们试图确定妇产科住院医师在多布斯事件前对人工流产的态度、学习人工流产知识的愿望以及在未来的实践中提供人工流产护理的意向:从 2021 年 1 月到 12 月,我们对威斯康星州和明尼苏达州 4 个项目的 70 名妇产科住院医师进行了调查,以评估他们对人工流产的态度、学习人工流产知识的愿望,以及在未来实践中提供人工流产护理的意向:70 名妇产科住院医师中有 55 名(79%)完成了调查。大多数人表示对人工流产持非常赞成的态度,几乎所有人都认为人工流产问题很重要,大多数人计划在今后的工作中提供人工流产护理。各机构在态度评分中位数或行为意向方面没有差异:结论:在多布斯案判决之前,明尼苏达州和威斯康星州的妇产科住院医师认为人工流产是重要的医疗保健,并打算在毕业后提供这种医疗服务。