Leveraging pharmacokinetic parameters as covariate in Bayesian logistic regression model to optimize dose selection in early phase oncology trial.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Xin Wei, Xiaosong Li, Ziyan Guo
{"title":"Leveraging pharmacokinetic parameters as covariate in Bayesian logistic regression model to optimize dose selection in early phase oncology trial.","authors":"Xin Wei, Xiaosong Li, Ziyan Guo","doi":"10.1080/10543406.2024.2379357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dose selection and optimization in early phase of oncology drug development serves as the foundation for the success of late phases drug development. Bivariate Bayesian logistic regression model (BLRM) is a widely utilized model-based algorithm that has been shown to improve the accuracy for identifying recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on dose-limiting-toxicity (DLT) over traditional method such as 3 + 3. However, it remains a challenge to optimize dose selection that strikes a proper balance between safety and efficacy in escalation and expansion phase of phase I trials. In this paper, we first use a phase I clinical trial to demonstrate how the variability of drug exposure related to pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters among trial participants may add to the difficulties of identifying optimal dose. We use simulation to show that concurrently or retrospectively fitting BLRM model for dose/toxicity data from escalation phase with dose-independent PK parameters as covariate lead to improved accuracy of identifying dose level at which DLT rate is within a prespecified toxicity interval. Furthermore, we proposed both model- and rule-based methods to modify dose at patient level in expansion cohorts based on their PK/exposure parameters. Simulation studies show this approach leads to higher likelihood for a dose level with a manageable toxicity and desirable efficacy margin to be advanced to late phase pipeline after being screened at expansion phase of phase I trial.</p>","PeriodicalId":54870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10543406.2024.2379357","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dose selection and optimization in early phase of oncology drug development serves as the foundation for the success of late phases drug development. Bivariate Bayesian logistic regression model (BLRM) is a widely utilized model-based algorithm that has been shown to improve the accuracy for identifying recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) based on dose-limiting-toxicity (DLT) over traditional method such as 3 + 3. However, it remains a challenge to optimize dose selection that strikes a proper balance between safety and efficacy in escalation and expansion phase of phase I trials. In this paper, we first use a phase I clinical trial to demonstrate how the variability of drug exposure related to pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters among trial participants may add to the difficulties of identifying optimal dose. We use simulation to show that concurrently or retrospectively fitting BLRM model for dose/toxicity data from escalation phase with dose-independent PK parameters as covariate lead to improved accuracy of identifying dose level at which DLT rate is within a prespecified toxicity interval. Furthermore, we proposed both model- and rule-based methods to modify dose at patient level in expansion cohorts based on their PK/exposure parameters. Simulation studies show this approach leads to higher likelihood for a dose level with a manageable toxicity and desirable efficacy margin to be advanced to late phase pipeline after being screened at expansion phase of phase I trial.

利用贝叶斯逻辑回归模型中的药代动力学参数作为协变量,优化早期肿瘤试验的剂量选择。
肿瘤药物开发早期的剂量选择和优化是后期药物开发成功的基础。双变量贝叶斯逻辑回归模型(BLRM)是一种广泛使用的基于模型的算法,与 3 + 3 等传统方法相比,它已被证明能提高根据剂量限制毒性(DLT)确定第二阶段推荐剂量(RP2D)的准确性。然而,在 I 期试验的升级和扩展阶段,如何优化剂量选择,在安全性和有效性之间取得适当平衡,仍然是一项挑战。在本文中,我们首先利用一项 I 期临床试验来说明试验参与者之间与药代动力学(PK)参数相关的药物暴露的变异性是如何增加确定最佳剂量的难度的。我们通过模拟实验表明,同时或回顾性地对升级阶段的剂量/毒性数据拟合 BLRM 模型,并将与剂量无关的 PK 参数作为协变量,可提高确定 DLT 发生率在预设毒性区间内的剂量水平的准确性。此外,我们还提出了基于模型和规则的方法,以根据患者的 PK/暴露参数修改扩增队列中患者的剂量。模拟研究表明,这种方法能使毒性可控且疗效理想的剂量水平更有可能在 I 期试验的扩增阶段通过筛选后进入后期阶段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 医学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
18.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, a rapid publication journal, discusses quality applications of statistics in biopharmaceutical research and development. Now publishing six times per year, it includes expositions of statistical methodology with immediate applicability to biopharmaceutical research in the form of full-length and short manuscripts, review articles, selected/invited conference papers, short articles, and letters to the editor. Addressing timely and provocative topics important to the biostatistical profession, the journal covers: Drug, device, and biological research and development; Drug screening and drug design; Assessment of pharmacological activity; Pharmaceutical formulation and scale-up; Preclinical safety assessment; Bioavailability, bioequivalence, and pharmacokinetics; Phase, I, II, and III clinical development including complex innovative designs; Premarket approval assessment of clinical safety; Postmarketing surveillance; Big data and artificial intelligence and applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信