Barriers to maintaining dignity for patients with schizophrenia: A qualitative study.

IF 2.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Nursing Ethics Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1177/09697330241262320
Elham Amiri, Rahim Baghaei, Hossein Ebrahimi, Hossein Habibzadeh
{"title":"Barriers to maintaining dignity for patients with schizophrenia: A qualitative study.","authors":"Elham Amiri, Rahim Baghaei, Hossein Ebrahimi, Hossein Habibzadeh","doi":"10.1177/09697330241262320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Since dignity is one of the fundamental rights of each patient, maintaining patients' dignity is essential. Unfortunately, in many cases, particularly among patients with schizophrenia (SCZ), dignity is not fully respected. Nonetheless, there is limited knowledge regarding this matter in Middle Eastern Nations.</p><p><strong>Research objective: </strong>This study aimed to identify the barriers to maintaining dignity for patients with schizophrenia from the perspective of patients with schizophrenia, their family caregivers, and healthcare personnel.</p><p><strong>Research design: </strong>This qualitative study was conducted with patients (<i>n</i> = 16), family caregivers (<i>n</i> = 4), and healthcare personnel (<i>n</i> = 6) who were selected using a purposeful sampling method. The data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth face-to-face interviews until the data reached saturation. Data were analyzed using the Graneheim and Lundman method.</p><p><strong>Ethical considerations: </strong>The Research Ethics Committee of Urmia University of Medical Sciences (IR.UMSU.REC.1401.099).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Analysis of the interviews revealed two main themes and five subthemes as the barriers to maintaining dignity for patients with schizophrenia. The main themes included \"Black shadow of stigma\" (three subthemes: \"Facing the fear and discrimination of others,\" \"Misconceptions in society,\" and \"Social rejection\") and \"Facing violations\" (two subthemes: \"Basic human rights violation\" and \"Negative emotional responses\").</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients' dignity with schizophrenia was at a low level due to the negative attitude of society toward these patients. In this respect, the basic human rights violations, social rejection, and misconceptions were abundant in society and care centers. An in-depth comprehension of the threatening factors affecting dignity can assist policymakers in safeguarding their dignity through effective programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49729,"journal":{"name":"Nursing Ethics","volume":" ","pages":"560-574"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09697330241262320","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Since dignity is one of the fundamental rights of each patient, maintaining patients' dignity is essential. Unfortunately, in many cases, particularly among patients with schizophrenia (SCZ), dignity is not fully respected. Nonetheless, there is limited knowledge regarding this matter in Middle Eastern Nations.

Research objective: This study aimed to identify the barriers to maintaining dignity for patients with schizophrenia from the perspective of patients with schizophrenia, their family caregivers, and healthcare personnel.

Research design: This qualitative study was conducted with patients (n = 16), family caregivers (n = 4), and healthcare personnel (n = 6) who were selected using a purposeful sampling method. The data were collected through semi-structured, in-depth face-to-face interviews until the data reached saturation. Data were analyzed using the Graneheim and Lundman method.

Ethical considerations: The Research Ethics Committee of Urmia University of Medical Sciences (IR.UMSU.REC.1401.099).

Findings: Analysis of the interviews revealed two main themes and five subthemes as the barriers to maintaining dignity for patients with schizophrenia. The main themes included "Black shadow of stigma" (three subthemes: "Facing the fear and discrimination of others," "Misconceptions in society," and "Social rejection") and "Facing violations" (two subthemes: "Basic human rights violation" and "Negative emotional responses").

Conclusion: Patients' dignity with schizophrenia was at a low level due to the negative attitude of society toward these patients. In this respect, the basic human rights violations, social rejection, and misconceptions were abundant in society and care centers. An in-depth comprehension of the threatening factors affecting dignity can assist policymakers in safeguarding their dignity through effective programs.

精神分裂症患者维护尊严的障碍:定性研究。
背景:尊严是每个病人的基本权利之一,因此维护病人的尊严至关重要。遗憾的是,在许多情况下,尤其是在精神分裂症(SCZ)患者中,尊严并没有得到充分尊重。然而,中东国家对这一问题的了解却十分有限:本研究旨在从精神分裂症患者、其家庭护理人员和医护人员的角度出发,找出维护精神分裂症患者尊严的障碍:这项定性研究采用有目的的抽样方法,对患者(16 人)、家庭护理人员(4 人)和医护人员(6 人)进行了调查。通过半结构化、面对面的深入访谈收集数据,直至数据达到饱和。数据分析采用 Graneheim 和 Lundman 方法:伦理考虑:乌尔米耶医科大学研究伦理委员会(IR.UMSU.REC.1401.099):对访谈内容的分析表明,精神分裂症患者在维护尊严方面遇到的障碍主要有两个主题和五个次主题。主主题包括 "污名化的黑色阴影"(三个次主题:"面对精神分裂症患者的恐惧和歧视"、"面对精神分裂症患者的心理障碍 "和 "面对精神分裂症患者的心理障碍"):"面对他人的恐惧和歧视"、"社会的误解 "和 "社会的排斥")和 "面对侵犯"(两个次主题:"结论:结论:由于社会对精神分裂症患者的消极态度,这些患者的尊严处于较低水平。结论:由于社会对精神分裂症患者的消极态度,他们的尊严处于较低水平,社会和护理中心对他们的基本人权的侵犯、社会排斥和误解比比皆是。深入了解影响尊严的威胁因素,有助于政策制定者通过有效的方案维护他们的尊严。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nursing Ethics
Nursing Ethics 医学-护理
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.90%
发文量
117
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing Ethics takes a practical approach to this complex subject and relates each topic to the working environment. The articles on ethical and legal issues are written in a comprehensible style and official documents are analysed in a user-friendly way. The international Editorial Board ensures the selection of a wide range of high quality articles of global significance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信