Pascal Schenk, Nikita Sutter, Erasmo Molina, Karl Wieser, Christian Gerber, Elias Bachmann
{"title":"High delta angle after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty increases stresses of the acromion: biomechanical study of different implant positions.","authors":"Pascal Schenk, Nikita Sutter, Erasmo Molina, Karl Wieser, Christian Gerber, Elias Bachmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acromial fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are a common complication. Nevertheless, only a few studies have identified risk factors for acromial fractures after RTSA. High delta angle (combination of inferiorization and medialization of the center of rotation [COR]) after RTSA was identified as a risk factor in recent studies. The aim of this study was the biomechanical exploration of different delta angles and implant configurations with regard to the acromial stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a rigid body model of the upper extremity muscle, forces of the deltoid muscle were calculated before and after implanting RTSA in different arm and implant positions. The deltoid muscle was divided into an anterior, middle, and posterior part. Implant positions of the glenoid components were changed in the medialization, lateralization, and inferiorization of the COR as well as lateralization of the humeral component. Further, in a finite element model of the upper extremity, the stresses of the acromion in the same implant design configurations were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in acromial stress between different delta angle model configurations were observed. Lateralization (5 and 10 mm) of the glenosphere reduced the maximal acromial stress by 21% (1.5 MPa) and 31% (1.3 MPa), respectively. Inferiorization (5 and 10 mm) of the glenosphere increased the maximal acromial stress by 5% (2.0 MPa) and 15% (2.2 MPa), respectively. Changes in positioning the humeral component was found to have the highest impact in this model configuration. A 10-mm-lateralized humeral component reduced acromial stress by 37% (1.2 MPa), whereas in the 6-mm-medialized configuration, an increase in acromial stress by 83% (3.48 MPa) was observed. There was a high correlation between the delta angle and acromial stress (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.967).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implant design configuration has an impact on the acromial stress. High delta angles correlate with an increase in acromial stress. Both lateralization of the COR and the humerus decreased the acromial stress in our study. The lateralization of the humerus has the highest impact in influencing acromial stress. Because of contrary results in the current literature, further studies with focus on the acromial stress influenced by different anatomic variants of the shoulder and the acromion are needed before a clinical recommendation can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acromial fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are a common complication. Nevertheless, only a few studies have identified risk factors for acromial fractures after RTSA. High delta angle (combination of inferiorization and medialization of the center of rotation [COR]) after RTSA was identified as a risk factor in recent studies. The aim of this study was the biomechanical exploration of different delta angles and implant configurations with regard to the acromial stress.
Methods: In a rigid body model of the upper extremity muscle, forces of the deltoid muscle were calculated before and after implanting RTSA in different arm and implant positions. The deltoid muscle was divided into an anterior, middle, and posterior part. Implant positions of the glenoid components were changed in the medialization, lateralization, and inferiorization of the COR as well as lateralization of the humeral component. Further, in a finite element model of the upper extremity, the stresses of the acromion in the same implant design configurations were measured.
Results: Differences in acromial stress between different delta angle model configurations were observed. Lateralization (5 and 10 mm) of the glenosphere reduced the maximal acromial stress by 21% (1.5 MPa) and 31% (1.3 MPa), respectively. Inferiorization (5 and 10 mm) of the glenosphere increased the maximal acromial stress by 5% (2.0 MPa) and 15% (2.2 MPa), respectively. Changes in positioning the humeral component was found to have the highest impact in this model configuration. A 10-mm-lateralized humeral component reduced acromial stress by 37% (1.2 MPa), whereas in the 6-mm-medialized configuration, an increase in acromial stress by 83% (3.48 MPa) was observed. There was a high correlation between the delta angle and acromial stress (R2 = 0.967).
Conclusion: Implant design configuration has an impact on the acromial stress. High delta angles correlate with an increase in acromial stress. Both lateralization of the COR and the humerus decreased the acromial stress in our study. The lateralization of the humerus has the highest impact in influencing acromial stress. Because of contrary results in the current literature, further studies with focus on the acromial stress influenced by different anatomic variants of the shoulder and the acromion are needed before a clinical recommendation can be made.
期刊介绍:
The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.