High delta angle after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty increases stresses of the acromion: biomechanical study of different implant positions.

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Pascal Schenk, Nikita Sutter, Erasmo Molina, Karl Wieser, Christian Gerber, Elias Bachmann
{"title":"High delta angle after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty increases stresses of the acromion: biomechanical study of different implant positions.","authors":"Pascal Schenk, Nikita Sutter, Erasmo Molina, Karl Wieser, Christian Gerber, Elias Bachmann","doi":"10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acromial fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are a common complication. Nevertheless, only a few studies have identified risk factors for acromial fractures after RTSA. High delta angle (combination of inferiorization and medialization of the center of rotation [COR]) after RTSA was identified as a risk factor in recent studies. The aim of this study was the biomechanical exploration of different delta angles and implant configurations with regard to the acromial stress.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a rigid body model of the upper extremity muscle, forces of the deltoid muscle were calculated before and after implanting RTSA in different arm and implant positions. The deltoid muscle was divided into an anterior, middle, and posterior part. Implant positions of the glenoid components were changed in the medialization, lateralization, and inferiorization of the COR as well as lateralization of the humeral component. Further, in a finite element model of the upper extremity, the stresses of the acromion in the same implant design configurations were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Differences in acromial stress between different delta angle model configurations were observed. Lateralization (5 and 10 mm) of the glenosphere reduced the maximal acromial stress by 21% (1.5 MPa) and 31% (1.3 MPa), respectively. Inferiorization (5 and 10 mm) of the glenosphere increased the maximal acromial stress by 5% (2.0 MPa) and 15% (2.2 MPa), respectively. Changes in positioning the humeral component was found to have the highest impact in this model configuration. A 10-mm-lateralized humeral component reduced acromial stress by 37% (1.2 MPa), whereas in the 6-mm-medialized configuration, an increase in acromial stress by 83% (3.48 MPa) was observed. There was a high correlation between the delta angle and acromial stress (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.967).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implant design configuration has an impact on the acromial stress. High delta angles correlate with an increase in acromial stress. Both lateralization of the COR and the humerus decreased the acromial stress in our study. The lateralization of the humerus has the highest impact in influencing acromial stress. Because of contrary results in the current literature, further studies with focus on the acromial stress influenced by different anatomic variants of the shoulder and the acromion are needed before a clinical recommendation can be made.</p>","PeriodicalId":50051,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jse.2024.05.034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Acromial fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) are a common complication. Nevertheless, only a few studies have identified risk factors for acromial fractures after RTSA. High delta angle (combination of inferiorization and medialization of the center of rotation [COR]) after RTSA was identified as a risk factor in recent studies. The aim of this study was the biomechanical exploration of different delta angles and implant configurations with regard to the acromial stress.

Methods: In a rigid body model of the upper extremity muscle, forces of the deltoid muscle were calculated before and after implanting RTSA in different arm and implant positions. The deltoid muscle was divided into an anterior, middle, and posterior part. Implant positions of the glenoid components were changed in the medialization, lateralization, and inferiorization of the COR as well as lateralization of the humeral component. Further, in a finite element model of the upper extremity, the stresses of the acromion in the same implant design configurations were measured.

Results: Differences in acromial stress between different delta angle model configurations were observed. Lateralization (5 and 10 mm) of the glenosphere reduced the maximal acromial stress by 21% (1.5 MPa) and 31% (1.3 MPa), respectively. Inferiorization (5 and 10 mm) of the glenosphere increased the maximal acromial stress by 5% (2.0 MPa) and 15% (2.2 MPa), respectively. Changes in positioning the humeral component was found to have the highest impact in this model configuration. A 10-mm-lateralized humeral component reduced acromial stress by 37% (1.2 MPa), whereas in the 6-mm-medialized configuration, an increase in acromial stress by 83% (3.48 MPa) was observed. There was a high correlation between the delta angle and acromial stress (R2 = 0.967).

Conclusion: Implant design configuration has an impact on the acromial stress. High delta angles correlate with an increase in acromial stress. Both lateralization of the COR and the humerus decreased the acromial stress in our study. The lateralization of the humerus has the highest impact in influencing acromial stress. Because of contrary results in the current literature, further studies with focus on the acromial stress influenced by different anatomic variants of the shoulder and the acromion are needed before a clinical recommendation can be made.

反向全肩关节置换术后的高 Delta 角增加了肩峰的应力:不同植入位置的生物力学研究。
背景:反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)后肩峰骨折是一种常见的并发症。然而,只有少数研究确定了RTSA术后肩峰骨折的风险因素。最近的研究发现,RTSA术后的高三角角(旋转中心下移和内移的组合)是一个风险因素。本研究旨在从生物力学角度探讨不同三角角和植入物配置对肩峰应力的影响:在上肢肌肉刚体模型中,计算了在不同手臂和植入位置植入 RTSA 前后三角肌的力量。三角肌分为前部、中部和后部。盂部件的植入位置在旋转中心(COR)内侧化、外侧化和下侧化以及肱骨部件外侧化时发生了变化。此外,还在上肢有限元模型中测量了相同植入设计配置下的肩峰应力:结果:观察到不同三角角模型配置的肩峰应力存在差异。盂部侧向化(5 毫米、10 毫米)分别将最大肩峰应力降低了 21% (1.5 兆帕) 和 31% (1.3 兆帕)。盂骨下移(5 毫米、10 毫米)则分别增加了 5%(2.0 兆帕)和 15%(2.2 兆帕)的最大肩峰应力。在该模型配置中,肱骨组件定位的变化影响最大。10毫米外侧化的肱骨组件使肩峰应力降低了37%(1.2兆帕),而在6毫米内侧化配置中,观察到肩峰应力增加了83%(3.48兆帕)。三角角与肩峰应力之间存在高度相关性(R 平方 = 0.967):结论:假体设计结构对肩峰应力有影响。结论:假体设计结构对肩峰应力有影响,高三角角与肩峰应力增加相关。在我们的研究中,COR和肱骨的侧移都会降低肩峰应力。肱骨外侧化对肩峰应力的影响最大。由于现有文献的研究结果与之相反,因此需要进一步研究肩部和肩峰的不同解剖变异对肩峰应力的影响,然后才能提出临床建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
23.30%
发文量
604
审稿时长
11.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The official publication for eight leading specialty organizations, this authoritative journal is the only publication to focus exclusively on medical, surgical, and physical techniques for treating injury/disease of the upper extremity, including the shoulder girdle, arm, and elbow. Clinically oriented and peer-reviewed, the Journal provides an international forum for the exchange of information on new techniques, instruments, and materials. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery features vivid photos, professional illustrations, and explicit diagrams that demonstrate surgical approaches and depict implant devices. Topics covered include fractures, dislocations, diseases and injuries of the rotator cuff, imaging techniques, arthritis, arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信