Analysis of Factors Determining Spleen Preservation during Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy - A Cohort Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Maciej Borys, Michał Wysocki, Krystyna Gałązka, Andrzej Budzyński
{"title":"Analysis of Factors Determining Spleen Preservation during Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy - A Cohort Study.","authors":"Maciej Borys, Michał Wysocki, Krystyna Gałązka, Andrzej Budzyński","doi":"10.1097/SLE.0000000000001309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spleen preservation during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) should be pursued if safe and oncologically justified. The aim of the presented study was to compare surgical outcomes and identify risk factors for unplanned splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and evaluate short and long-terms outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The following study is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, with the intention of preserving the spleen, for benign tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas between August 2012 and December 2022. Follow-up for patients' survival was completed in January 2023. In all, 106 patients were in total included in this study. Median age was 58 (41 to 67) years. The study population included 29 males (27.4%) and 77 females (72.6%).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Spleen preservation was possible in 67 (63.2%) patients. The tumor size was larger in the splenectomy group (respectively, 30 (16.5 to 49) vs. 15 (11 to 25); P <0.001). Overall, serious postoperative morbidity was 13.4% in the LSPDP group and 20.5% in the second group ( P =0.494). There were no perioperative deaths. The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate was 18% in the splenectomy group and 14.9% in the LSPDP group, while B and C fistulas were diagnosed in 15.4% and 10.5% of patients, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model, tumor size >3 cm was found to independently increase odds for unplanned splenectomy (OR 8.41, 95%CI 2.89-24.46; standardized for BMI).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Unplanned splenectomy during the attempt of LSPDP does not increase the risk for postoperative morbidity and postoperative pancreatic fistula. The independent risk factor for unplanned splenectomy during LSPDP is tumor size above 3 cm.</p>","PeriodicalId":22092,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","volume":" ","pages":"497-503"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SLE.0000000000001309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Spleen preservation during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LSPDP) should be pursued if safe and oncologically justified. The aim of the presented study was to compare surgical outcomes and identify risk factors for unplanned splenectomy during laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and evaluate short and long-terms outcomes.

Methods: The following study is a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy, with the intention of preserving the spleen, for benign tumors of the body and tail of the pancreas between August 2012 and December 2022. Follow-up for patients' survival was completed in January 2023. In all, 106 patients were in total included in this study. Median age was 58 (41 to 67) years. The study population included 29 males (27.4%) and 77 females (72.6%).

Results: Spleen preservation was possible in 67 (63.2%) patients. The tumor size was larger in the splenectomy group (respectively, 30 (16.5 to 49) vs. 15 (11 to 25); P <0.001). Overall, serious postoperative morbidity was 13.4% in the LSPDP group and 20.5% in the second group ( P =0.494). There were no perioperative deaths. The postoperative pancreatic fistula rate was 18% in the splenectomy group and 14.9% in the LSPDP group, while B and C fistulas were diagnosed in 15.4% and 10.5% of patients, respectively. In the multivariate logistic regression model, tumor size >3 cm was found to independently increase odds for unplanned splenectomy (OR 8.41, 95%CI 2.89-24.46; standardized for BMI).

Conclusion: Unplanned splenectomy during the attempt of LSPDP does not increase the risk for postoperative morbidity and postoperative pancreatic fistula. The independent risk factor for unplanned splenectomy during LSPDP is tumor size above 3 cm.

腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术中保留脾脏的决定因素分析 - 一项队列研究。
背景:在腹腔镜远端胰腺切除术(LSPDP)中,如果安全且肿瘤学上合理,则应保留脾脏。本研究旨在比较腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术的手术效果,确定非计划性脾切除的风险因素,并评估短期和长期效果:以下研究是一项回顾性队列研究,对象是2012年8月至2022年12月期间因胰腺体部和尾部良性肿瘤接受腹腔镜胰腺远端切除术的连续患者,目的是保留脾脏。对患者生存情况的随访于2023年1月结束。本研究共纳入 106 名患者。中位年龄为 58(41 至 67)岁。研究对象包括 29 名男性(27.4%)和 77 名女性(72.6%):结果:67 例(63.2%)患者可以保留脾脏。结果:67 例(63.2%)患者可以保留脾脏,脾脏切除组的肿瘤大小更大(分别为 30(16.5 至 49) vs. 15(11 至 25);P3 厘米被发现会独立增加意外脾脏切除的几率(OR 8.41,95%CI 2.89-24.46;根据体重指数标准化):结论:尝试 LSPDP 过程中的意外脾切除不会增加术后发病率和术后胰瘘的风险。LSPDP期间计划外脾切除术的独立风险因素是肿瘤大小超过3厘米。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
103
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Laparoscopy Endoscopy & Percutaneous Techniques is a primary source for peer-reviewed, original articles on the newest techniques and applications in operative laparoscopy and endoscopy. Its Editorial Board includes many of the surgeons who pioneered the use of these revolutionary techniques. The journal provides complete, timely, accurate, practical coverage of laparoscopic and endoscopic techniques and procedures; current clinical and basic science research; preoperative and postoperative patient management; complications in laparoscopic and endoscopic surgery; and new developments in instrumentation and technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信