Safety and Tolerability of Initiating Sacubitril-Valsartan With Spironolactone During Hospitalization for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of pharmacy practice Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-18 DOI:10.1177/08971900241262382
Alexander R Levine, Katarzyna Sasiela, Mark Baker
{"title":"Safety and Tolerability of Initiating Sacubitril-Valsartan With Spironolactone During Hospitalization for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure.","authors":"Alexander R Levine, Katarzyna Sasiela, Mark Baker","doi":"10.1177/08971900241262382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Initiation of sacubitril-valsartan and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) may be an ideal time to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy. However, there is limited research assessing the safety of combining these agents in the hospital. <b>Methods:</b> This was a multi-center, retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study performed at 7 acute-care hospitals within a large health care system. All adult patients admitted with ADHF between January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 who received sacubitril-valsartan with MRA (MRA group) or without MRA (non-MRA group) and had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% were included in the study. <b>Results:</b> 220 patients were screened during the study time frame with 179 meeting inclusion criteria. Following propensity-score matching, 50 patients in the MRA group were matched to 50 patients in the non-MRA group. The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 24% in the non-MRA group compared to 20% in the MRA group (<i>P</i> = .629). There was a significantly greater incidence of hyperkalemia in the MRA group (0% vs 10%; <i>P</i> = .022). None of the patients in the non-MRA group were readmitted within 30 days due to an ADR compared to 6% in the MRA group (<i>P</i> = .079). <b>Conclusion:</b> The addition of spironolactone to sacubitril-valsartan in the hospital setting following stabilization of ADHF did not lead to a significantly greater incidence of overall ADRs, but patients were more likely to develop hyperkalemia and there was a numerically higher incidence of 30-day readmissions due to ADRs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16818,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pharmacy practice","volume":" ","pages":"43-51"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pharmacy practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08971900241262382","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Initiation of sacubitril-valsartan and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) during hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) may be an ideal time to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy. However, there is limited research assessing the safety of combining these agents in the hospital. Methods: This was a multi-center, retrospective, propensity-score matched cohort study performed at 7 acute-care hospitals within a large health care system. All adult patients admitted with ADHF between January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 who received sacubitril-valsartan with MRA (MRA group) or without MRA (non-MRA group) and had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% were included in the study. Results: 220 patients were screened during the study time frame with 179 meeting inclusion criteria. Following propensity-score matching, 50 patients in the MRA group were matched to 50 patients in the non-MRA group. The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 24% in the non-MRA group compared to 20% in the MRA group (P = .629). There was a significantly greater incidence of hyperkalemia in the MRA group (0% vs 10%; P = .022). None of the patients in the non-MRA group were readmitted within 30 days due to an ADR compared to 6% in the MRA group (P = .079). Conclusion: The addition of spironolactone to sacubitril-valsartan in the hospital setting following stabilization of ADHF did not lead to a significantly greater incidence of overall ADRs, but patients were more likely to develop hyperkalemia and there was a numerically higher incidence of 30-day readmissions due to ADRs.

急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者住院期间开始使用萨库比特利-缬沙坦和螺内酯的安全性和耐受性
背景:在急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)住院期间开始使用沙库比妥-缬沙坦和矿皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRA)可能是优化指南指导下的药物治疗的理想时机。然而,目前对住院期间联合使用这些药物的安全性评估研究还很有限。研究方法这是一项多中心、回顾性、倾向分数匹配队列研究,在一家大型医疗保健系统内的 7 家急诊医院进行。研究纳入了2019年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间因ADHF入院的所有成人患者,这些患者接受了沙库比妥-缬沙坦联合MRA治疗(MRA组)或未接受MRA治疗(非MRA组),且左室射血分数(LVEF)小于40%。结果:研究期间共筛选出 220 名患者,其中 179 名符合纳入标准。经过倾向分数匹配,MRA 组的 50 名患者与非 MRA 组的 50 名患者进行了匹配。非 MRA 组的药物不良反应 (ADR) 总发生率为 24%,而 MRA 组为 20%(P = .629)。MRA 组的高钾血症发生率明显更高(0% 对 10%;P = .022)。非 MRA 组中没有患者在 30 天内因 ADR 而再次入院,而 MRA 组中有 6% 的患者因 ADR 而再次入院(P = .079)。结论在稳定 ADHF 后的住院环境中,在沙库比妥-缬沙坦基础上加用螺内酯并不会导致总体 ADR 发生率显著升高,但患者更容易出现高钾血症,而且因 ADR 导致的 30 天内再入院的发生率也更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of pharmacy practice
Journal of pharmacy practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pharmacy Practice offers the practicing pharmacist topical, important, and useful information to support pharmacy practice and pharmaceutical care and expand the pharmacist"s professional horizons. The journal is presented in a single-topic, scholarly review format. Guest editors are selected for expertise in the subject area, who then recruit contributors from that practice or topic area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信