Vascular responsiveness to low-dose dexamethasone in extremely premature infants: negative influence of fetal growth restriction.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Arvind Sehgal, Marcel F Nold, Calum T Roberts, Samuel Menahem
{"title":"Vascular responsiveness to low-dose dexamethasone in extremely premature infants: negative influence of fetal growth restriction.","authors":"Arvind Sehgal, Marcel F Nold, Calum T Roberts, Samuel Menahem","doi":"10.1152/ajpheart.00375.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dexamethasone is frequently prescribed for preterm infants to wean from respiratory support and/or to facilitate extubation. This pre-/postintervention prospective study ascertained the impact on clinical (respiratory support) and echocardiographic parameters after dexamethasone therapy in preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR) infants compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants. Echocardiography was performed within 24 h before the start and after completion of 10-day therapy. Parameters assessed included those reflecting pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular output. Seventeen FGR infants (birth gestation and birth weight, 25.2 ± 1.1 wk and 497 ± 92 g, respectively) were compared with 22 AGA infants (gestation and birth weight, 24.5 ± 0.8 and 663 ± 100 g, respectively). Baseline respiratory severity score (mean airway pressure × fractional inspired oxygen) was comparable between the groups, (median [interquartile range] FGR, 10 [6, 13] vs. AGA, 8 ± 2.8, <i>P</i> = 0.08). Pre-dexamethasone parameters of pulmonary vascular resistance (FGR, 0.19 ± 0.03 vs. AGA, 0.2 ± 0.03, <i>P</i> = 0.16) and right ventricular output (FGR, 171 ± 20 vs. 174 ± 17 mL/kg/min, <i>P</i> = 0.6) were statistically comparable. At post-dexamethasone assessments, the decrease in the respiratory severity score was significantly greater in AGA infants (median [interquartile range] FGR, 10 [6, 13] to 9 [2.6, 13.5], <i>P</i> = 0.009 vs. AGA, 8 ± 2.8 to 3 ± 1, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). Improvement in measures of pulmonary vascular resistance (ratio of time to peak velocity to right ventricular ejection time) was greater in AGA infants (FGR, 0.19 ± 0.03 to 0.2 ± 0.03, <i>P</i> = 0.13 vs. AGA 0.2 ± 0.03 to 0.25 ± 0.03, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). The improvement in right ventricular output was significantly greater in AGA infants (171 ± 20 to 190 ± 21, <i>P</i> = 0.014 vs. 174 ± 17 to 203 ± 22, <i>P</i> < 0.0001). This highlights differential cardiorespiratory responsiveness to dexamethasone in extremely preterm FGR infants, which may reflect the in utero maladaptive state.<b>NEW & NOTEWORTHY</b> Dexamethasone (DEX) is frequently used in preterm infants dependent on ventilator support. Differences in vascular structure and function that may have developed prenatally arising from the chronic intrauterine hypoxemia in FGR infants may adversely affect responsiveness. The clinical efficacy of DEX was significantly less in FGR (birth weight < 10th centile) infants, compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants. Echocardiography showed significantly less improvement in pulmonary vascular resistance in FGR, compared with AGA infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7692,"journal":{"name":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","volume":" ","pages":"H666-H671"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00375.2024","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dexamethasone is frequently prescribed for preterm infants to wean from respiratory support and/or to facilitate extubation. This pre-/postintervention prospective study ascertained the impact on clinical (respiratory support) and echocardiographic parameters after dexamethasone therapy in preterm fetal growth restriction (FGR) infants compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants. Echocardiography was performed within 24 h before the start and after completion of 10-day therapy. Parameters assessed included those reflecting pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular output. Seventeen FGR infants (birth gestation and birth weight, 25.2 ± 1.1 wk and 497 ± 92 g, respectively) were compared with 22 AGA infants (gestation and birth weight, 24.5 ± 0.8 and 663 ± 100 g, respectively). Baseline respiratory severity score (mean airway pressure × fractional inspired oxygen) was comparable between the groups, (median [interquartile range] FGR, 10 [6, 13] vs. AGA, 8 ± 2.8, P = 0.08). Pre-dexamethasone parameters of pulmonary vascular resistance (FGR, 0.19 ± 0.03 vs. AGA, 0.2 ± 0.03, P = 0.16) and right ventricular output (FGR, 171 ± 20 vs. 174 ± 17 mL/kg/min, P = 0.6) were statistically comparable. At post-dexamethasone assessments, the decrease in the respiratory severity score was significantly greater in AGA infants (median [interquartile range] FGR, 10 [6, 13] to 9 [2.6, 13.5], P = 0.009 vs. AGA, 8 ± 2.8 to 3 ± 1, P < 0.0001). Improvement in measures of pulmonary vascular resistance (ratio of time to peak velocity to right ventricular ejection time) was greater in AGA infants (FGR, 0.19 ± 0.03 to 0.2 ± 0.03, P = 0.13 vs. AGA 0.2 ± 0.03 to 0.25 ± 0.03, P < 0.0001). The improvement in right ventricular output was significantly greater in AGA infants (171 ± 20 to 190 ± 21, P = 0.014 vs. 174 ± 17 to 203 ± 22, P < 0.0001). This highlights differential cardiorespiratory responsiveness to dexamethasone in extremely preterm FGR infants, which may reflect the in utero maladaptive state.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Dexamethasone (DEX) is frequently used in preterm infants dependent on ventilator support. Differences in vascular structure and function that may have developed prenatally arising from the chronic intrauterine hypoxemia in FGR infants may adversely affect responsiveness. The clinical efficacy of DEX was significantly less in FGR (birth weight < 10th centile) infants, compared with appropriate for gestational age (AGA) infants. Echocardiography showed significantly less improvement in pulmonary vascular resistance in FGR, compared with AGA infants.

极早产儿血管对低剂量地塞米松的反应性:胎儿生长受限的负面影响。
地塞米松经常被用于早产儿断绝呼吸支持和/或促进拔管。这项干预前-干预后前瞻性研究确定了地塞米松治疗后对 FGR 早产儿与 AGA 早产儿的临床(呼吸支持)和超声心动图参数的影响。超声心动图检查在 10 天治疗开始前和结束后 24 小时内进行。评估的参数包括反映肺血管阻力和右心室输出量的参数。17 名 FGR 婴儿(妊娠期和出生体重分别为 25.2±1.1 周和 497±92g)与 22 名 AGA 婴儿(妊娠期和出生体重分别为 24.5±0.8 周和 663±100g)进行了比较。两组婴儿的基线呼吸严重程度评分(平均气道压力 x 吸入氧分压)相当(中位数[四分位间范围]FGR:10 [6, 13] vs AGA:8±2.8,P=0.08)。地塞米松前的肺血管阻力参数(FGR:0.19±0.03 vs AGA 0.2±0.03,P=0.16)和右心室输出量参数(FGR:171±20 vs 174±17ml/kg/min,P=0.6)在统计学上具有可比性。在地塞米松后的评估中,AGA 婴儿呼吸严重程度评分的下降幅度明显更大,(中位数[四分位数间距] FGR:10 [6, 13] 到 9 [2.6, 13.5],P=0.009 vs AGA:8±2.8 到 3±1,PP=0.13 vs AGA 0.2±0.03 到 0.25±0.03,PP=0.014 vs 174±17 到 203±22,Pin-uteroadaptive state。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology publishes original investigations, reviews and perspectives on the physiology of the heart, vasculature, and lymphatics. These articles include experimental and theoretical studies of cardiovascular function at all levels of organization ranging from the intact and integrative animal and organ function to the cellular, subcellular, and molecular levels. The journal embraces new descriptions of these functions and their control systems, as well as their basis in biochemistry, biophysics, genetics, and cell biology. Preference is given to research that provides significant new mechanistic physiological insights that determine the performance of the normal and abnormal heart and circulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信