Tight-Frame-Like Analysis-Sparse Recovery Using Nontight Sensing Matrices

IF 2.1 3区 数学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Kartheek Kumar Reddy Nareddy, Abijith Jagannath Kamath, Chandra Sekhar Seelamantula
{"title":"Tight-Frame-Like Analysis-Sparse Recovery Using Nontight Sensing Matrices","authors":"Kartheek Kumar Reddy Nareddy, Abijith Jagannath Kamath, Chandra Sekhar Seelamantula","doi":"10.1137/23m1625846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 17, Issue 3, Page 1587-1618, September 2024. <br/> Abstract.The choice of the sensing matrix is crucial in compressed sensing. Random Gaussian sensing matrices satisfy the restricted isometry property, which is crucial for solving the sparse recovery problem using convex optimization techniques. However, tight-frame sensing matrices result in minimum mean-squared-error recovery given oracle knowledge of the support of the sparse vector. If the sensing matrix is not tight, could one achieve the recovery performance assured by a tight frame by suitably designing the recovery strategy? This is the key question addressed in this paper. We consider the analysis-sparse [math]-minimization problem with a generalized [math]-norm-based data-fidelity and show that it effectively corresponds to using a tight-frame sensing matrix. The new formulation offers improved performance bounds when the number of nonzeros is large. One could develop a tight-frame variant of a known sparse recovery algorithm using the proposed formalism. We solve the analysis-sparse recovery problem in an unconstrained setting using proximal methods. Within the tight-frame sensing framework, we rescale the gradients of the data-fidelity loss in the iterative updates to further improve the accuracy of analysis-sparse recovery. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithms offer superior analysis-sparse recovery performance. Proceeding further, we also develop deep-unfolded variants, with a convolutional neural network as the sparsifying operator. On the application front, we consider compressed sensing image recovery. Experimental results on Set11, BSD68, Urban100, and DIV2K datasets show that the proposed techniques outperform the state-of-the-art techniques, with performance measured in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index metric.","PeriodicalId":49528,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m1625846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 17, Issue 3, Page 1587-1618, September 2024.
Abstract.The choice of the sensing matrix is crucial in compressed sensing. Random Gaussian sensing matrices satisfy the restricted isometry property, which is crucial for solving the sparse recovery problem using convex optimization techniques. However, tight-frame sensing matrices result in minimum mean-squared-error recovery given oracle knowledge of the support of the sparse vector. If the sensing matrix is not tight, could one achieve the recovery performance assured by a tight frame by suitably designing the recovery strategy? This is the key question addressed in this paper. We consider the analysis-sparse [math]-minimization problem with a generalized [math]-norm-based data-fidelity and show that it effectively corresponds to using a tight-frame sensing matrix. The new formulation offers improved performance bounds when the number of nonzeros is large. One could develop a tight-frame variant of a known sparse recovery algorithm using the proposed formalism. We solve the analysis-sparse recovery problem in an unconstrained setting using proximal methods. Within the tight-frame sensing framework, we rescale the gradients of the data-fidelity loss in the iterative updates to further improve the accuracy of analysis-sparse recovery. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithms offer superior analysis-sparse recovery performance. Proceeding further, we also develop deep-unfolded variants, with a convolutional neural network as the sparsifying operator. On the application front, we consider compressed sensing image recovery. Experimental results on Set11, BSD68, Urban100, and DIV2K datasets show that the proposed techniques outperform the state-of-the-art techniques, with performance measured in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index metric.
紧框架分析--使用非紧传感矩阵进行解析恢复
SIAM 影像科学期刊》,第 17 卷第 3 期,第 1587-1618 页,2024 年 9 月。 摘要:在压缩传感中,传感矩阵的选择至关重要。随机高斯传感矩阵满足受限等距特性,这对于利用凸优化技术解决稀疏恢复问题至关重要。然而,如果有关于稀疏矢量支持的甲骨文知识,紧帧传感矩阵会导致最小均方误差恢复。如果传感矩阵不紧密,能否通过适当设计恢复策略达到紧密框架所保证的恢复性能?这是本文要解决的关键问题。我们考虑了基于数据保真度的广义[数学]规范的分析-稀疏[数学]-最小化问题,并证明它有效地对应于使用紧帧传感矩阵。当非零点的数量较多时,新的表述方式能提供更好的性能边界。利用所提出的形式主义,我们可以开发一种已知稀疏恢复算法的紧帧变体。我们使用近似方法解决了无约束环境下的分析-稀疏恢复问题。在紧帧传感框架内,我们在迭代更新中对数据保真度损失的梯度进行了调整,以进一步提高分析稀疏恢复的准确性。实验结果表明,所提出的算法具有卓越的分析-稀疏恢复性能。在此基础上,我们还开发了以卷积神经网络作为稀疏化算子的深度非折叠变体。在应用方面,我们考虑了压缩传感图像复原。在 Set11、BSD68、Urban100 和 DIV2K 数据集上的实验结果表明,所提出的技术在峰值信噪比和结构相似性指标方面的表现优于最先进的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences
SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE-COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences (SIIMS) covers all areas of imaging sciences, broadly interpreted. It includes image formation, image processing, image analysis, image interpretation and understanding, imaging-related machine learning, and inverse problems in imaging; leading to applications to diverse areas in science, medicine, engineering, and other fields. The journal’s scope is meant to be broad enough to include areas now organized under the terms image processing, image analysis, computer graphics, computer vision, visual machine learning, and visualization. Formal approaches, at the level of mathematics and/or computations, as well as state-of-the-art practical results, are expected from manuscripts published in SIIMS. SIIMS is mathematically and computationally based, and offers a unique forum to highlight the commonality of methodology, models, and algorithms among diverse application areas of imaging sciences. SIIMS provides a broad authoritative source for fundamental results in imaging sciences, with a unique combination of mathematics and applications. SIIMS covers a broad range of areas, including but not limited to image formation, image processing, image analysis, computer graphics, computer vision, visualization, image understanding, pattern analysis, machine intelligence, remote sensing, geoscience, signal processing, medical and biomedical imaging, and seismic imaging. The fundamental mathematical theories addressing imaging problems covered by SIIMS include, but are not limited to, harmonic analysis, partial differential equations, differential geometry, numerical analysis, information theory, learning, optimization, statistics, and probability. Research papers that innovate both in the fundamentals and in the applications are especially welcome. SIIMS focuses on conceptually new ideas, methods, and fundamentals as applied to all aspects of imaging sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信