{"title":"Tight-Frame-Like Analysis-Sparse Recovery Using Nontight Sensing Matrices","authors":"Kartheek Kumar Reddy Nareddy, Abijith Jagannath Kamath, Chandra Sekhar Seelamantula","doi":"10.1137/23m1625846","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 17, Issue 3, Page 1587-1618, September 2024. <br/> Abstract.The choice of the sensing matrix is crucial in compressed sensing. Random Gaussian sensing matrices satisfy the restricted isometry property, which is crucial for solving the sparse recovery problem using convex optimization techniques. However, tight-frame sensing matrices result in minimum mean-squared-error recovery given oracle knowledge of the support of the sparse vector. If the sensing matrix is not tight, could one achieve the recovery performance assured by a tight frame by suitably designing the recovery strategy? This is the key question addressed in this paper. We consider the analysis-sparse [math]-minimization problem with a generalized [math]-norm-based data-fidelity and show that it effectively corresponds to using a tight-frame sensing matrix. The new formulation offers improved performance bounds when the number of nonzeros is large. One could develop a tight-frame variant of a known sparse recovery algorithm using the proposed formalism. We solve the analysis-sparse recovery problem in an unconstrained setting using proximal methods. Within the tight-frame sensing framework, we rescale the gradients of the data-fidelity loss in the iterative updates to further improve the accuracy of analysis-sparse recovery. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithms offer superior analysis-sparse recovery performance. Proceeding further, we also develop deep-unfolded variants, with a convolutional neural network as the sparsifying operator. On the application front, we consider compressed sensing image recovery. Experimental results on Set11, BSD68, Urban100, and DIV2K datasets show that the proposed techniques outperform the state-of-the-art techniques, with performance measured in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index metric.","PeriodicalId":49528,"journal":{"name":"SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1137/23m1625846","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, Volume 17, Issue 3, Page 1587-1618, September 2024. Abstract.The choice of the sensing matrix is crucial in compressed sensing. Random Gaussian sensing matrices satisfy the restricted isometry property, which is crucial for solving the sparse recovery problem using convex optimization techniques. However, tight-frame sensing matrices result in minimum mean-squared-error recovery given oracle knowledge of the support of the sparse vector. If the sensing matrix is not tight, could one achieve the recovery performance assured by a tight frame by suitably designing the recovery strategy? This is the key question addressed in this paper. We consider the analysis-sparse [math]-minimization problem with a generalized [math]-norm-based data-fidelity and show that it effectively corresponds to using a tight-frame sensing matrix. The new formulation offers improved performance bounds when the number of nonzeros is large. One could develop a tight-frame variant of a known sparse recovery algorithm using the proposed formalism. We solve the analysis-sparse recovery problem in an unconstrained setting using proximal methods. Within the tight-frame sensing framework, we rescale the gradients of the data-fidelity loss in the iterative updates to further improve the accuracy of analysis-sparse recovery. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithms offer superior analysis-sparse recovery performance. Proceeding further, we also develop deep-unfolded variants, with a convolutional neural network as the sparsifying operator. On the application front, we consider compressed sensing image recovery. Experimental results on Set11, BSD68, Urban100, and DIV2K datasets show that the proposed techniques outperform the state-of-the-art techniques, with performance measured in terms of peak signal-to-noise ratio and structural similarity index metric.
期刊介绍:
SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences (SIIMS) covers all areas of imaging sciences, broadly interpreted. It includes image formation, image processing, image analysis, image interpretation and understanding, imaging-related machine learning, and inverse problems in imaging; leading to applications to diverse areas in science, medicine, engineering, and other fields. The journal’s scope is meant to be broad enough to include areas now organized under the terms image processing, image analysis, computer graphics, computer vision, visual machine learning, and visualization. Formal approaches, at the level of mathematics and/or computations, as well as state-of-the-art practical results, are expected from manuscripts published in SIIMS. SIIMS is mathematically and computationally based, and offers a unique forum to highlight the commonality of methodology, models, and algorithms among diverse application areas of imaging sciences. SIIMS provides a broad authoritative source for fundamental results in imaging sciences, with a unique combination of mathematics and applications.
SIIMS covers a broad range of areas, including but not limited to image formation, image processing, image analysis, computer graphics, computer vision, visualization, image understanding, pattern analysis, machine intelligence, remote sensing, geoscience, signal processing, medical and biomedical imaging, and seismic imaging. The fundamental mathematical theories addressing imaging problems covered by SIIMS include, but are not limited to, harmonic analysis, partial differential equations, differential geometry, numerical analysis, information theory, learning, optimization, statistics, and probability. Research papers that innovate both in the fundamentals and in the applications are especially welcome. SIIMS focuses on conceptually new ideas, methods, and fundamentals as applied to all aspects of imaging sciences.