Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America by Leslie A. Schwalm (review)

Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1353/soh.2024.a932578
Rana A. Hogarth
{"title":"Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America by Leslie A. Schwalm (review)","authors":"Rana A. Hogarth","doi":"10.1353/soh.2024.a932578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <span>Reviewed by:</span> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em> by Leslie A. Schwalm <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Rana A. Hogarth </li> </ul> <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em>. By Leslie A. Schwalm. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2023. Pp. xvi, 215. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 978-1-4696-7269-4; cloth, $99.00, ISBN 978-1-4696-7268-7.) <p>Leslie A. Schwalm has put her impressive skills to work in her latest book, <em>Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America</em>. In this powerful study, Schwalm investigates the Union army’s project of systematically collecting data on the bodies of Black and white troops under the guise of advancing what contemporaries “often described as the ‘science of man”’ (p. 48). Not only did northern medical men preserve the belief that Blackness and Black bodies were inferior even as the system of racial slavery was coming to an end, but they also contributed to the longevity of race science as a legitimate sub-discipline practiced by highly trained experts. Schwalm’s book complements existing histories of the American Civil War that focus on the war’s relationship to science, public health, and medical knowledge production. Schwalm focuses on Union medical men and their statistics-driven quest to locate and prove the existence of embodied racial difference. In this regard, Schwalm joins the likes of Margaret Humphreys, Jim Downs, and Gretchen Long—scholars whose work foregrounds the racial dimensions of health and disease during the Civil War and documents the ever-present racism that African Americans faced during their wartime freedom struggles.</p> <p>The bulk of the book is about white Union medical personnel’s view of Black people rather than Black people’s interactions with white northerners who purported to have their interests at heart. That said, Schwalm dedicates sections of her book to the unique struggles Black people faced as they <strong>[End Page 623]</strong> mobilized for war. Indeed, the first two chapters offer background on how Black people had to navigate wartime either as soldiers, denied fair treatment and dignity, or as physicians, rebuffed when they sought to work in Black regiments. Schwalm also recounts how Black women were deliberately shut out of most wartime relief activities of the United States Sanitary Commission (USSC). It is a familiar story of racial discrimination, and Schwalm’s rendering seeks to amplify African American women’s responses to this exclusion through the creation of their own relief associations.</p> <p>The third and fourth chapters are arguably the strongest. Schwalm zeroes in on the undercurrents of anti-Black sentiment that steered the Union’s efforts at measuring racial features during the war. She taps into a wide range of sources, including records from the USSC and the correspondence of white Union medical personnel, to show the extent to which Black men’s bodies were compared against the white—the assumed normative body. With measurements and questionnaires, Union medical officials bequeathed future generations of race scientists with a specialized vocabulary for mapping race traits. Benjamin A. Gould, astronomer and leader in the USSC’s statistical bureau; Ira Russell, Union surgeon and abolitionist; and Benjamin R. Woodward, surgeon in the Twenty-second Illinois Infantry, are just some of the figures who aimed to make the alleged distinctiveness of Black troops’ bodies legible through quantification and study.</p> <p>Finally, Union personnel also legitimated claims of Black inferiority through their work with cadavers and anatomical specimens. Schwalm explores how Union medical men took advantage of the extraordinary and tragic opportunities the Civil War presented for dissection and surgery. They frequently engaged in the material and figurative preservation of racial biological determinism by anatomizing Black troops’ remains, often with little respect for them. While this story of commodifying Black people’s bodies in the name of medicine may be familiar to specialists working in the history of race and medicine, it remains an instructive story that needs to be shared among scholars with broad interests in the Civil War, race, and the history of African American experiences in wartime.</p> Rana A. Hogarth University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ... </p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/soh.2024.a932578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

Reviewed by:

  • Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America by Leslie A. Schwalm
  • Rana A. Hogarth
Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America. By Leslie A. Schwalm. (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2023. Pp. xvi, 215. Paper, $24.95, ISBN 978-1-4696-7269-4; cloth, $99.00, ISBN 978-1-4696-7268-7.)

Leslie A. Schwalm has put her impressive skills to work in her latest book, Medicine, Science, and Making Race in Civil War America. In this powerful study, Schwalm investigates the Union army’s project of systematically collecting data on the bodies of Black and white troops under the guise of advancing what contemporaries “often described as the ‘science of man”’ (p. 48). Not only did northern medical men preserve the belief that Blackness and Black bodies were inferior even as the system of racial slavery was coming to an end, but they also contributed to the longevity of race science as a legitimate sub-discipline practiced by highly trained experts. Schwalm’s book complements existing histories of the American Civil War that focus on the war’s relationship to science, public health, and medical knowledge production. Schwalm focuses on Union medical men and their statistics-driven quest to locate and prove the existence of embodied racial difference. In this regard, Schwalm joins the likes of Margaret Humphreys, Jim Downs, and Gretchen Long—scholars whose work foregrounds the racial dimensions of health and disease during the Civil War and documents the ever-present racism that African Americans faced during their wartime freedom struggles.

The bulk of the book is about white Union medical personnel’s view of Black people rather than Black people’s interactions with white northerners who purported to have their interests at heart. That said, Schwalm dedicates sections of her book to the unique struggles Black people faced as they [End Page 623] mobilized for war. Indeed, the first two chapters offer background on how Black people had to navigate wartime either as soldiers, denied fair treatment and dignity, or as physicians, rebuffed when they sought to work in Black regiments. Schwalm also recounts how Black women were deliberately shut out of most wartime relief activities of the United States Sanitary Commission (USSC). It is a familiar story of racial discrimination, and Schwalm’s rendering seeks to amplify African American women’s responses to this exclusion through the creation of their own relief associations.

The third and fourth chapters are arguably the strongest. Schwalm zeroes in on the undercurrents of anti-Black sentiment that steered the Union’s efforts at measuring racial features during the war. She taps into a wide range of sources, including records from the USSC and the correspondence of white Union medical personnel, to show the extent to which Black men’s bodies were compared against the white—the assumed normative body. With measurements and questionnaires, Union medical officials bequeathed future generations of race scientists with a specialized vocabulary for mapping race traits. Benjamin A. Gould, astronomer and leader in the USSC’s statistical bureau; Ira Russell, Union surgeon and abolitionist; and Benjamin R. Woodward, surgeon in the Twenty-second Illinois Infantry, are just some of the figures who aimed to make the alleged distinctiveness of Black troops’ bodies legible through quantification and study.

Finally, Union personnel also legitimated claims of Black inferiority through their work with cadavers and anatomical specimens. Schwalm explores how Union medical men took advantage of the extraordinary and tragic opportunities the Civil War presented for dissection and surgery. They frequently engaged in the material and figurative preservation of racial biological determinism by anatomizing Black troops’ remains, often with little respect for them. While this story of commodifying Black people’s bodies in the name of medicine may be familiar to specialists working in the history of race and medicine, it remains an instructive story that needs to be shared among scholars with broad interests in the Civil War, race, and the history of African American experiences in wartime.

Rana A. Hogarth University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ...

分享
查看原文
内战时期美国的医学、科学和种族形成》,作者 Leslie A. Schwalm(评论)
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要:评论者 内战美国的医学、科学和种族形成》,作者 Leslie A. Schwalm Rana A. Hogarth 《内战美国的医学、科学和种族形成》。作者:Leslie A. Schwalm。(Chapel Hill:北卡罗来纳大学出版社,2023 年。Pp.纸质版,24.95 美元,ISBN 978-1-4696-7269-4;布质版,99.00 美元,ISBN 978-1-4696-7268-7)。Leslie A. Schwalm 在她的新书《内战美国的医学、科学和种族形成》中运用了她令人印象深刻的技巧。在这本强有力的研究报告中,施瓦姆调查了联邦军队系统收集黑人和白人军队尸体数据的项目,其幌子是推进同时代人 "经常描述为'人类科学'"(第 48 页)。即使在种族奴隶制即将结束的时候,北方的医学家们不仅保留了黑人和黑人身体低劣的信念,而且还促使种族科学作为一门由训练有素的专家从事的合法分支学科长期存在。施瓦姆的这本书是对现有的美国内战史的补充,这些内战史侧重于战争与科学、公共卫生和医学知识生产的关系。施瓦姆关注的重点是联邦医护人员以及他们以统计数据为驱动力来寻找和证明种族差异的存在。在这方面,施瓦姆加入了玛格丽特-汉弗莱斯、吉姆-唐斯和格雷琴-朗等学者的行列,这些学者的研究突出了内战期间健康和疾病的种族层面,并记录了非裔美国人在战时争取自由的斗争中所面临的无处不在的种族主义。这本书的大部分内容都是关于白人联邦医务人员对黑人的看法,而不是黑人与声称以黑人利益为重的北方白人之间的互动。尽管如此,施瓦尔姆还是在书中用了一些章节来描述黑人在动员参战时所面临的独特斗争。事实上,前两章介绍了黑人在战时的背景,他们或是作为士兵,被剥夺了公平待遇和尊严,或是作为医生,当他们试图在黑人军团中工作时遭到拒绝。施瓦尔姆还讲述了黑人妇女如何被故意排除在美国卫生委员会(USSC)的大多数战时救济活动之外。这是一个人们耳熟能详的种族歧视故事,施瓦尔姆在书中试图通过建立自己的救济协会来扩大非裔美国妇女对这种排斥的反应。第三章和第四章可以说是最有力的章节。施瓦姆将目光投向了反黑人情绪的暗流,这些情绪引导着联邦在战争期间衡量种族特征的努力。她利用广泛的资料来源,包括美国南方科学委员会的记录和白人联邦医务人员的通信,展示了黑人男子的身体在多大程度上与白人--假定的标准身体--进行了比较。通过测量和问卷调查,联邦医疗官员为后代的种族科学家们留下了绘制种族特征图的专业词汇。本杰明-A-古尔德(Benjamin A. Gould)是天文学家,也是美国国会统计局的领导人;艾拉-拉塞尔(Ira Russell)是联邦外科医生,也是废奴主义者;本杰明-R-伍德沃德(Benjamin R. Woodward)是伊利诺伊州第二十二步兵团的外科医生,他们只是其中的一些人,他们的目标是通过量化和研究,使黑人部队身体的所谓独特性变得清晰可见。最后,联邦人员还通过处理尸体和解剖标本使黑人劣等的说法合法化。施瓦尔姆探讨了联邦医护人员如何利用南北战争提供的非凡而悲惨的机会进行解剖和手术。他们通过解剖黑人士兵的遗体,经常在物质上和形象上保留了种族生物决定论,而且往往对他们缺乏尊重。虽然这个以医学的名义将黑人的身体商品化的故事可能为研究种族和医学史的专家所熟悉,但它仍然是一个具有启发性的故事,需要对内战、种族和非裔美国人战时经历史有广泛兴趣的学者们分享。Rana A. Hogarth 伊利诺伊大学厄巴纳-香槟分校 Copyright © 2024 The Southern Historical Association ...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信