Popular Maximum-Utility Matchings with Matroid Constraints

Gergely Csáji, Tamás Király, Kenjiro Takazawa, Yu Yokoi
{"title":"Popular Maximum-Utility Matchings with Matroid Constraints","authors":"Gergely Csáji, Tamás Király, Kenjiro Takazawa, Yu Yokoi","doi":"arxiv-2407.09798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We investigate weighted settings of popular matching problems with matroid\nconstraints. The concept of popularity was originally defined for matchings in\nbipartite graphs, where vertices have preferences over the incident edges.\nThere are two standard models depending on whether vertices on one or both\nsides have preferences. A matching $M$ is popular if it does not lose a\nhead-to-head election against any other matching. In our generalized models,\none or both sides have matroid constraints, and a weight function is defined on\nthe ground set. Our objective is to find a popular optimal matching, i.e., a\nmaximum-weight matching that is popular among all maximum-weight matchings\nsatisfying the matroid constraints. For both one- and two-sided preferences\nmodels, we provide efficient algorithms to find such solutions, combining\nalgorithms for unweighted models with fundamental techniques from combinatorial\noptimization. The algorithm for the one-sided preferences model is further\nextended to a model where the weight function is generalized to an\nM$^\\natural$-concave utility function. Finally, we complement these\ntractability results by providing hardness results for the problems of finding\na popular near-optimal matching. These hardness results hold even without\nmatroid constraints and with very restricted weight functions.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.09798","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate weighted settings of popular matching problems with matroid constraints. The concept of popularity was originally defined for matchings in bipartite graphs, where vertices have preferences over the incident edges. There are two standard models depending on whether vertices on one or both sides have preferences. A matching $M$ is popular if it does not lose a head-to-head election against any other matching. In our generalized models, one or both sides have matroid constraints, and a weight function is defined on the ground set. Our objective is to find a popular optimal matching, i.e., a maximum-weight matching that is popular among all maximum-weight matchings satisfying the matroid constraints. For both one- and two-sided preferences models, we provide efficient algorithms to find such solutions, combining algorithms for unweighted models with fundamental techniques from combinatorial optimization. The algorithm for the one-sided preferences model is further extended to a model where the weight function is generalized to an M$^\natural$-concave utility function. Finally, we complement these tractability results by providing hardness results for the problems of finding a popular near-optimal matching. These hardness results hold even without matroid constraints and with very restricted weight functions.
带 Matroid 约束的流行最大效用匹配
我们研究了具有矩阵约束的流行匹配问题的加权设置。流行度的概念最初是为两方图中的匹配定义的,其中顶点对入射边有偏好。如果一个匹配 $M$ 在与其他匹配的竞争中没有失利,那么它就是受欢迎的。在我们的广义模型中,一方或双方都有矩阵约束,并且在地面集上定义了权重函数。我们的目标是找到一个受欢迎的最优匹配,即在所有满足矩阵约束条件的最大权重匹配中受欢迎的最大权重匹配。对于单边和双边偏好模型,我们都提供了高效的算法来找到这样的解,并将非加权模型的算法与组合优化的基本技术相结合。单边偏好模型的算法进一步扩展到了权重函数泛化为 M$^\natural$-concave 效用函数的模型。最后,我们对可计算性结果进行了补充,提供了寻找流行的近优匹配问题的硬度结果。即使没有机器人约束和非常有限的权重函数,这些硬度结果也是成立的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信