Proportional Dynamics in Linear Fisher Markets with Auto-bidding: Convergence, Incentives and Fairness

Juncheng Li, Pingzhong Tang
{"title":"Proportional Dynamics in Linear Fisher Markets with Auto-bidding: Convergence, Incentives and Fairness","authors":"Juncheng Li, Pingzhong Tang","doi":"arxiv-2407.11872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proportional dynamics, originated from peer-to-peer file sharing systems,\nmodels a decentralized price-learning process in Fisher markets. Previously,\nitems in the dynamics operate independently of one another, and each is assumed\nto belong to a different seller. In this paper, we show how it can be\ngeneralized to the setting where each seller brings multiple items and buyers\nallocate budgets at the granularity of sellers rather than individual items.\nThe generalized dynamics consistently converges to the competitive equilibrium,\nand interestingly relates to the auto-bidding paradigm currently popular in\nonline advertising auction markets. In contrast to peer-to-peer networks, the\nproportional rule is not imposed as a protocol in auto-bidding markets.\nRegarding this incentive concern, we show that buyers have a strong tendency to\nfollow the rule, but it is easy for sellers to profitably deviate (given\nbuyers' commitment to the rule). Based on this observation, we further study\nthe seller-side deviation game and show that it admits a unique pure Nash\nequilibrium. Though it is generally different from the competitive equilibrium,\nwe show that it attains a good fairness guarantee as long as the market is\ncompetitive enough and not severely monopolized.","PeriodicalId":501316,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Computer Science and Game Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.11872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Proportional dynamics, originated from peer-to-peer file sharing systems, models a decentralized price-learning process in Fisher markets. Previously, items in the dynamics operate independently of one another, and each is assumed to belong to a different seller. In this paper, we show how it can be generalized to the setting where each seller brings multiple items and buyers allocate budgets at the granularity of sellers rather than individual items. The generalized dynamics consistently converges to the competitive equilibrium, and interestingly relates to the auto-bidding paradigm currently popular in online advertising auction markets. In contrast to peer-to-peer networks, the proportional rule is not imposed as a protocol in auto-bidding markets. Regarding this incentive concern, we show that buyers have a strong tendency to follow the rule, but it is easy for sellers to profitably deviate (given buyers' commitment to the rule). Based on this observation, we further study the seller-side deviation game and show that it admits a unique pure Nash equilibrium. Though it is generally different from the competitive equilibrium, we show that it attains a good fairness guarantee as long as the market is competitive enough and not severely monopolized.
有自动竞价的线性费雪市场中的比例动态:收敛、激励和公平性
比例动态源于点对点文件共享系统,是费舍尔市场中分散价格学习过程的模型。在此之前,动力学中的项目彼此独立运行,每个项目都被假定属于不同的卖家。在本文中,我们展示了如何将其推广到每个卖家带来多个物品、买家按卖家而非单个物品的粒度分配预算的环境中。推广后的动态过程始终收敛于竞争均衡,并有趣地与目前流行于在线广告拍卖市场的自动竞价范式相关联。与点对点网络不同的是,在自动竞价市场中,比例规则并不作为一种协议强加于人。关于这种激励问题,我们的研究表明,买方有强烈的遵循规则的倾向,但卖方很容易偏离规则并从中获利(考虑到买方对规则的承诺)。基于这一观察结果,我们进一步研究了卖方偏离博弈,并证明它存在唯一的纯纳什均衡。虽然它与竞争性均衡一般不同,但我们证明,只要市场足够竞争且没有严重垄断,它就能获得良好的公平性保证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信