SiC and Si detectors comparison for high carbon energy spectrometry

L. Torrisi, V. Havránek, A. Mackova, A. Torrisi, M. Cutroneo
{"title":"SiC and Si detectors comparison for high carbon energy spectrometry","authors":"L. Torrisi, V. Havránek, A. Mackova, A. Torrisi, M. Cutroneo","doi":"10.1088/1748-0221/19/07/P07005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An innovative SiC Schottky junction and a traditional p-n Si surface barrier detector have been compared to detect carbon ions with MeVs kinetic energy. To this, a comparison was performed during Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) using 2–10 MeV carbon ion beams. The energy resolution and detection efficiency for RBS analysis using the two detectors and their detection electronics are presented. The detector parameters dependencies on the surface passivating layers, ion energy and current dependence, ion penetration depth, detection efficiency, energy resolution, and others are discussed. The comparison of RBS analysis with SiC and Si is investigated highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of using SiC with respect to the traditional Si surface barrier detectors. The two detectors employed for proton, helium and carbon RBS spectrometry of different targets have been also compared on the base of the literature data.","PeriodicalId":507814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Instrumentation","volume":"37 29","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Instrumentation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/07/P07005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An innovative SiC Schottky junction and a traditional p-n Si surface barrier detector have been compared to detect carbon ions with MeVs kinetic energy. To this, a comparison was performed during Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS) using 2–10 MeV carbon ion beams. The energy resolution and detection efficiency for RBS analysis using the two detectors and their detection electronics are presented. The detector parameters dependencies on the surface passivating layers, ion energy and current dependence, ion penetration depth, detection efficiency, energy resolution, and others are discussed. The comparison of RBS analysis with SiC and Si is investigated highlighting the advantages and disadvantages of using SiC with respect to the traditional Si surface barrier detectors. The two detectors employed for proton, helium and carbon RBS spectrometry of different targets have been also compared on the base of the literature data.
碳化硅和硅探测器在高碳能光谱分析中的比较
对创新型碳化硅肖特基结和传统的 p-n 硅表面电阻探测器进行了比较,以探测动能为 MeVs 的碳离子。为此,在使用 2-10 MeV 碳离子束进行卢瑟福反向散射光谱分析(RBS)时进行了比较。报告介绍了使用两种探测器及其探测电子设备进行 RBS 分析的能量分辨率和探测效率。讨论了探测器参数对表面钝化层的依赖性、离子能量和电流依赖性、离子穿透深度、探测效率、能量分辨率等问题。研究了使用碳化硅和硅进行 RBS 分析的比较,突出了使用碳化硅与传统的硅表面势垒探测器相比的优缺点。根据文献数据,还比较了这两种探测器在质子、氦和碳不同目标的 RBS 光谱分析中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信