The effect of therapeutic dose of gamma radiation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated tooth obturated using different types of sealers (An in-vitro study)

Mohamed Omaia, E. Abaza, Manal Abdelbaky
{"title":"The effect of therapeutic dose of gamma radiation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated tooth obturated using different types of sealers (An in-vitro study)","authors":"Mohamed Omaia, E. Abaza, Manal Abdelbaky","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.253377.2868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Radiation therapy is a crucial component of cancer treatment, but it can have adverse effects on oral tissues, including teeth. The impact of radiation on the fracture resistance (FR) of endodontically treated teeth has piqued the interest of dental researchers. Bioceramic sealers like CeraSeal have shown promising dentin bonding and sealing abilities, but there is limited data on their FR compared to traditional resin-based sealers like ADSEAL. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of therapeutic radiation doses on the FR of root canal-treated teeth filled with gutta-percha and two sealers. Materials and Methods: Ninety extracted mandibular premolars were divided into experimental and control groups. Each group was further subdivided into subgroups with and without irradiation (n=15) and obturated with either ADSEAL or CeraSeal. The FR of each group was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests for matched groups and One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05). Results: Before irradiation, both sealers significantly increased the FR compared to the control group. CeraSeal exhibited the highest FR, followed by ADSEAL. After irradiation, all groups showed a significant reduction in FR, with CeraSeal demonstrating the least reduction. Conclusions: Regardless of the sealer used, irradiation decreases the FR in root canal-treated teeth. CeraSeal outperformed ADSEAL in maintaining tooth strength after irradiation.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.253377.2868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Radiation therapy is a crucial component of cancer treatment, but it can have adverse effects on oral tissues, including teeth. The impact of radiation on the fracture resistance (FR) of endodontically treated teeth has piqued the interest of dental researchers. Bioceramic sealers like CeraSeal have shown promising dentin bonding and sealing abilities, but there is limited data on their FR compared to traditional resin-based sealers like ADSEAL. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of therapeutic radiation doses on the FR of root canal-treated teeth filled with gutta-percha and two sealers. Materials and Methods: Ninety extracted mandibular premolars were divided into experimental and control groups. Each group was further subdivided into subgroups with and without irradiation (n=15) and obturated with either ADSEAL or CeraSeal. The FR of each group was tested using a Universal Testing Machine. Statistical analyses included independent t-tests for matched groups and One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey’s Post Hoc test for multiple comparisons (p < 0.05). Results: Before irradiation, both sealers significantly increased the FR compared to the control group. CeraSeal exhibited the highest FR, followed by ADSEAL. After irradiation, all groups showed a significant reduction in FR, with CeraSeal demonstrating the least reduction. Conclusions: Regardless of the sealer used, irradiation decreases the FR in root canal-treated teeth. CeraSeal outperformed ADSEAL in maintaining tooth strength after irradiation.
伽马射线治疗剂量对使用不同类型封闭剂封闭的牙髓治疗牙的抗折断性的影响(体外研究)
背景:放射治疗是癌症治疗的重要组成部分,但它会对包括牙齿在内的口腔组织产生不良影响。辐射对根管治疗牙齿抗折性(FR)的影响引起了牙科研究人员的兴趣。CeraSeal 等生物陶瓷封闭剂已显示出良好的牙本质粘结和封闭能力,但与 ADSEAL 等传统树脂封闭剂相比,有关其抗折性的数据十分有限。因此,本研究的目的是调查治疗辐射剂量对用古塔漆和两种封闭剂填充的根管治疗牙的 FR 的影响。材料和方法:将拔出的 90 颗下颌前磨牙分为实验组和对照组。每组又分为接受辐照和未接受辐照两组(n=15),并使用 ADSEAL 或 CeraSeal 进行封堵。使用万能试验机对各组的 FR 进行测试。统计分析包括配对组的独立 t 检验和单向方差分析,多重比较采用 Tukey's 后检验(P < 0.05)。结果与对照组相比,两种封闭剂在辐照前都能显著提高 FR 值。CeraSeal 的 FR 值最高,其次是 ADSEAL。辐照后,所有组的 FR 都明显下降,CeraSeal 的下降幅度最小。结论:无论使用哪种封闭剂,辐照都会降低根管治疗牙齿的FR。CeraSeal 在辐照后保持牙齿强度方面优于 ADSEAL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信