Experimental soil matrix, vortex and oil skimming technology as a tertiary treatment of wastewater effluent

C. Tugade, C. Pescos, C.A.L. Caliwag, C.D.V. Centeno, J.D.C. Tan, Q.M.D Malveda, R.C. Olivares, R.M. Chavez, L. Carrillo
{"title":"Experimental soil matrix, vortex and oil skimming technology as a tertiary treatment of wastewater effluent","authors":"C. Tugade, C. Pescos, C.A.L. Caliwag, C.D.V. Centeno, J.D.C. Tan, Q.M.D Malveda, R.C. Olivares, R.M. Chavez, L. Carrillo","doi":"10.1088/1755-1315/1372/1/012043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Water is a necessary resource that must be carefully managed. Hazardous chemicals are produced with increased industrial activities and contamination has been detrimental to both people and the environment. An experimental investigation was performed to evaluate the efficiency of vortex technology, soil matrices, and oil skimmer separately for combination as a tertiary wastewater treatment in the design of a phytoremediation system. The objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of each component in removing oil and grease, reducing the concentration of ammonia, nitrate, and phosphate; quality control measures for dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids, and chemical oxygen demand. One-way ANOVA, kinetics analysis, and adoption isotherm analysis were applied to determine the significance of the parameters. Analysis of results for the oil skimmer exhibited an efficiency of 96% in removing oil and grease after 5 hours of treatment. The vortex technology results were fluctuating with percentage removal of nitrates at 11% while ammonia with an initial concentration of 5.24 mg/L was reduced to 4.12 mg/L. Phosphate decreased after treatment from an initial of 0.87 mg/L to 0.809 mg/L. The analysis of pollutant concentration in the soil matrix after a 5-day period indicated a greater efficiency compared to the vortex technology in the removal of ammonia and phosphate. The ammonia concentration decreased from 18.7 mg/L and 21.4 mg/L to <0.1 mg/L. Similarly, phosphate concentration decreased from 15.5 mg/L to 1.13 mg/L and from 32.5 mg/L to 0.948 mg/L. The research finding underscores the efficiency of the soil matrix in removing ammonia and phosphate but recommends the need for additional intervention to lower nitrate. Overall, the three technologies showed potential and greater efficiencies in mitigating wastewater streams resulting in a notable reduction in oil and pollutant concentrations.","PeriodicalId":506254,"journal":{"name":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","volume":"11 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1372/1/012043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Water is a necessary resource that must be carefully managed. Hazardous chemicals are produced with increased industrial activities and contamination has been detrimental to both people and the environment. An experimental investigation was performed to evaluate the efficiency of vortex technology, soil matrices, and oil skimmer separately for combination as a tertiary wastewater treatment in the design of a phytoremediation system. The objective of the study is to evaluate the performance of each component in removing oil and grease, reducing the concentration of ammonia, nitrate, and phosphate; quality control measures for dissolved oxygen, total dissolved solids, and chemical oxygen demand. One-way ANOVA, kinetics analysis, and adoption isotherm analysis were applied to determine the significance of the parameters. Analysis of results for the oil skimmer exhibited an efficiency of 96% in removing oil and grease after 5 hours of treatment. The vortex technology results were fluctuating with percentage removal of nitrates at 11% while ammonia with an initial concentration of 5.24 mg/L was reduced to 4.12 mg/L. Phosphate decreased after treatment from an initial of 0.87 mg/L to 0.809 mg/L. The analysis of pollutant concentration in the soil matrix after a 5-day period indicated a greater efficiency compared to the vortex technology in the removal of ammonia and phosphate. The ammonia concentration decreased from 18.7 mg/L and 21.4 mg/L to <0.1 mg/L. Similarly, phosphate concentration decreased from 15.5 mg/L to 1.13 mg/L and from 32.5 mg/L to 0.948 mg/L. The research finding underscores the efficiency of the soil matrix in removing ammonia and phosphate but recommends the need for additional intervention to lower nitrate. Overall, the three technologies showed potential and greater efficiencies in mitigating wastewater streams resulting in a notable reduction in oil and pollutant concentrations.
试验性土壤基质、涡流和撇油技术作为废水三级处理技术
水是一种必须谨慎管理的必要资源。随着工业活动的增加,产生了有害的化学物质,污染对人类和环境都造成了危害。我们进行了一项实验调查,以评估涡流技术、土壤基质和撇油器在植物修复系统设计中分别用作三级废水处理的组合效率。研究的目的是评估各组成部分在去除油脂、降低氨氮、硝酸盐和磷酸盐浓度方面的性能,以及溶解氧、溶解固体总量和化学需氧量的质量控制措施。采用单因素方差分析、动力学分析和采用等温线分析来确定参数的重要性。对撇油机的结果分析表明,经过 5 小时的处理,其去除油脂的效率为 96%。涡流技术的结果是波动的,硝酸盐的去除率为 11%,而氨氮从初始浓度 5.24 毫克/升降至 4.12 毫克/升。磷酸盐在处理后从最初的 0.87 毫克/升降至 0.809 毫克/升。5 天后对土壤基质中污染物浓度的分析表明,与涡流技术相比,涡流技术去除氨氮和磷酸盐的效率更高。氨浓度分别从 18.7 毫克/升和 21.4 毫克/升降至小于 0.1 毫克/升。同样,磷酸盐浓度从 15.5 毫克/升降至 1.13 毫克/升,从 32.5 毫克/升降至 0.948 毫克/升。这项研究成果强调了土壤基质在去除氨氮和磷酸盐方面的效率,但建议需要采取更多干预措施来降低硝酸盐。总体而言,这三种技术在缓解废水流方面显示出了潜力和更高的效率,从而显著降低了油类和污染物的浓度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信