Exploring Awareness and Perception of Do Not Resuscitate Orders in A Saudi Arabian General Population

Omar Sami Basubrain
{"title":"Exploring Awareness and Perception of Do Not Resuscitate Orders in A Saudi Arabian General Population","authors":"Omar Sami Basubrain","doi":"10.55489/njcm.150720244057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders are crucial, yet often misunderstood, medical directives. This study investigated public understanding and attitudes towards DNRs in Saudi Arabia. This study investigated public understanding and attitudes towards Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders in Saudi Arabia.\nMethods: A cross-sectional web survey was conducted among 416 Saudi residents aged 18 and above. The survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and emotional responses related to DNR orders.\nResults: Over half (65.7%) lacked sufficient understanding of DNRs, highlighting a knowledge gap. While 56.8% grasped the meaning, less than half saw DNRs as beneficial for reducing pain or easing burdens on loved ones, indicating mixed attitudes. Decision-making preferences varied, with 49.1% advocating for medical professionals' involvement and 31% favouring family decisions. Personal experiences influenced understanding, with those having a family member's DNR order exhibiting higher comprehension.\nConclusion: Significant knowledge gaps and mixed attitudes towards DNRs exist. Public education programs, improved patient communication, and culturally sensitive approaches are recommended to bridge this gap and empower individuals to make informed decisions.","PeriodicalId":489477,"journal":{"name":"National journal of community medicine","volume":"16 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"National journal of community medicine","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55489/njcm.150720244057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders are crucial, yet often misunderstood, medical directives. This study investigated public understanding and attitudes towards DNRs in Saudi Arabia. This study investigated public understanding and attitudes towards Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders in Saudi Arabia. Methods: A cross-sectional web survey was conducted among 416 Saudi residents aged 18 and above. The survey assessed knowledge, attitudes, and emotional responses related to DNR orders. Results: Over half (65.7%) lacked sufficient understanding of DNRs, highlighting a knowledge gap. While 56.8% grasped the meaning, less than half saw DNRs as beneficial for reducing pain or easing burdens on loved ones, indicating mixed attitudes. Decision-making preferences varied, with 49.1% advocating for medical professionals' involvement and 31% favouring family decisions. Personal experiences influenced understanding, with those having a family member's DNR order exhibiting higher comprehension. Conclusion: Significant knowledge gaps and mixed attitudes towards DNRs exist. Public education programs, improved patient communication, and culturally sensitive approaches are recommended to bridge this gap and empower individuals to make informed decisions.
探索沙特阿拉伯普通人群对 "不要抢救 "指令的认识和理解
背景:禁止抢救(DNR)指令是至关重要的医疗指令,但却经常被误解。本研究调查了沙特阿拉伯公众对禁止复苏令的理解和态度。本研究调查了沙特阿拉伯公众对禁止复苏(DNR)指令的理解和态度:对 416 名 18 岁及以上的沙特居民进行了横断面网络调查。调查评估了与 "不做人工呼吸 "命令相关的知识、态度和情绪反应:结果:超过半数(65.7%)的人对 DNR 缺乏足够的了解,凸显出知识差距。56.8%的人理解了DNR的含义,但只有不到一半的人认为DNR有利于减轻疼痛或减轻亲人的负担,这表明了不同的态度。做出决定的偏好各不相同,49.1% 的人主张由医疗专业人员参与,31% 的人赞成由家人做出决定。个人经历影响了对DNR的理解,那些曾有家庭成员下达DNR命令的人对DNR的理解程度较高:结论:人们对DNR的认识存在很大差距,态度也不尽相同。建议通过公共教育计划、改善患者沟通和文化敏感性方法来弥补这一差距,并使个人有能力做出知情决定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信