Analisis Komparatif Kualitas Pelayanan pada Nasabah Pengguna Aplikasi Pegadaian Syariah Digital dan Manual: Studi Kasus Pegadaian Syariah Cabang Kusumanegara

Weni Widyawati, Fahmi Mar’i Mahatir, Priyono puji Prasetyo, Salamatun Asakdiyah
{"title":"Analisis Komparatif Kualitas Pelayanan pada Nasabah Pengguna Aplikasi Pegadaian Syariah Digital dan Manual: Studi Kasus Pegadaian Syariah Cabang Kusumanegara","authors":"Weni Widyawati, Fahmi Mar’i Mahatir, Priyono puji Prasetyo, Salamatun Asakdiyah","doi":"10.47467/alkharaj.v6i7.3116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The background of the problem of this research is a comparison of the quality of service received by customers using the Pegadaian Syariah Digital application and manually at Pegadaian Syariah Kusumanegara Branch Yogyakarta. Customers predominantly use the manual system rather than using the Pegadaian Syariah Digital application, because the system often errors and transaction failures occur. The Pegadaian Syariah Digital application is expected to help customers make smartphone transactions without having to make transactions manually. With this Digital Sharia Pegadaian application, it can meet the needs of customers when transacting without directly attending the Sharia Pegadaian and this application has various features that will be selected when transacting. The formulation of the problem of this study is whether there are differences in service quality for customers using digital and manual sharia pawnshop applications. This research is quantitative research, this type of research is also comparative analysis research, the data source used is primary data. The data collection technique used is a questionnaire with a total sample size of 100 samples which are divided into 50 samples for digital sharia pawnshops and 50 samples for manual ones. The analysis techniques used are validity test, reliability test, mann whitney test, and homogeneity test. The results obtained in this study indicate that there is no significant difference between digital and manual pawnshops.","PeriodicalId":517158,"journal":{"name":"Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","volume":"82 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Kharaj: Jurnal Ekonomi, Keuangan & Bisnis Syariah","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47467/alkharaj.v6i7.3116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The background of the problem of this research is a comparison of the quality of service received by customers using the Pegadaian Syariah Digital application and manually at Pegadaian Syariah Kusumanegara Branch Yogyakarta. Customers predominantly use the manual system rather than using the Pegadaian Syariah Digital application, because the system often errors and transaction failures occur. The Pegadaian Syariah Digital application is expected to help customers make smartphone transactions without having to make transactions manually. With this Digital Sharia Pegadaian application, it can meet the needs of customers when transacting without directly attending the Sharia Pegadaian and this application has various features that will be selected when transacting. The formulation of the problem of this study is whether there are differences in service quality for customers using digital and manual sharia pawnshop applications. This research is quantitative research, this type of research is also comparative analysis research, the data source used is primary data. The data collection technique used is a questionnaire with a total sample size of 100 samples which are divided into 50 samples for digital sharia pawnshops and 50 samples for manual ones. The analysis techniques used are validity test, reliability test, mann whitney test, and homogeneity test. The results obtained in this study indicate that there is no significant difference between digital and manual pawnshops.
使用数字和手动 Pegadaian Syariah 应用程序的客户服务质量比较分析:Pegadaian Syariah Kusumanegara 分行案例研究
本研究问题的背景是比较日惹 Pegadaian Syariah Kusumanegara 分行的客户使用 Pegadaian Syariah 数码应用程序和手工操作所获得的服务质量。客户主要使用人工系统,而不是使用 Pegadaian Syariah Digital 应用程序,因为系统经常出错和交易失败。Pegadaian Syariah 数码应用程序有望帮助客户使用智能手机进行交易,而无需手动进行交易。有了这个数字伊斯兰教法 Pegadaian 应用程序,就可以满足客户在交易时的需求,而无需直接去伊斯兰教法 Pegadaian,而且这个应用程序有各种功能,客户在交易时可以选择这些功能。本研究问题的提出是,使用数字和手动伊斯兰当铺应用程序的客户在服务质量方面是否存在差异。本研究属于定量研究,这类研究也属于比较分析研究,使用的数据来源是原始数据。使用的数据收集技术是调查问卷,样本量为 100 个,其中 50 个样本用于数字伊斯兰教典当行,50 个样本用于手工伊斯兰教典当行。使用的分析技术包括有效性测试、可靠性测试、曼-惠特尼测试和同质性测试。研究结果表明,数字典当行和手工典当行之间没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信