Comparison of Strain Development of Implant Supported Three Units Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated from Zirconia and PEEK “In-vitro study”

Mostafa Hassan, Tarek Salah, Gihan Younis, T. Samhan
{"title":"Comparison of Strain Development of Implant Supported Three Units Fixed Partial Dentures Fabricated from Zirconia and PEEK “In-vitro study”","authors":"Mostafa Hassan, Tarek Salah, Gihan Younis, T. Samhan","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.280626.2994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of the Problem: selection of prosthetic materials is a critical factor affecting the long-term success of implant supported restorations. PEEK poly-ether-ether ketone-is a quite new polymer used for dental applications. However, there are limited data available concerning Stress analysis and strain development of PEEK restorations as implant superstructure. Introduction; Materials and Methods: A total of 14 frameworks (n=7) were fabricated of Zirconia and PEEK by milling technique, divided into two equal groups to be randomly seated on its corresponding titanium abutment and then subjected to 5000 thermo-cycles. Strain gauge method was selected in this study to assess strain development where strain gauges were adhesively bonded mesial and distal to each implant-abutment unit and data were recorded using a strain meter device. Results: As regards the overall strain (mean of the four channels): there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: PEEK frameworks revealed slightly higher strain compared to zirconia with o significant difference in the over-all strain channels.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":"138 23","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.280626.2994","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: selection of prosthetic materials is a critical factor affecting the long-term success of implant supported restorations. PEEK poly-ether-ether ketone-is a quite new polymer used for dental applications. However, there are limited data available concerning Stress analysis and strain development of PEEK restorations as implant superstructure. Introduction; Materials and Methods: A total of 14 frameworks (n=7) were fabricated of Zirconia and PEEK by milling technique, divided into two equal groups to be randomly seated on its corresponding titanium abutment and then subjected to 5000 thermo-cycles. Strain gauge method was selected in this study to assess strain development where strain gauges were adhesively bonded mesial and distal to each implant-abutment unit and data were recorded using a strain meter device. Results: As regards the overall strain (mean of the four channels): there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups. Conclusion: PEEK frameworks revealed slightly higher strain compared to zirconia with o significant difference in the over-all strain channels.
氧化锆和聚醚醚酮制作的种植体支持三单元固定局部义齿应变发展的比较 "体外研究
问题陈述:修复材料的选择是影响种植体支持修复体长期成功的关键因素。PEEK 聚醚醚酮是一种用于牙科应用的新型聚合物。然而,有关 PEEK 修复体作为种植体上部结构的应力分析和应变发展的数据非常有限。引言;材料与方法:通过铣削技术制作了 14 个氧化锆和 PEEK 骨架(n=7),将其分为两组,随机安装在相应的钛基台上,然后进行 5000 次热循环。本研究采用应变计法评估应变发展情况,将应变计粘贴在每个种植体-基台单元的中远端,并使用应变计装置记录数据。结果总体应变(四个通道的平均值):两组之间没有统计学意义上的显著差异。结论:与氧化锆相比,PEEK 框架显示的应变略高,但在总体应变通道上没有明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信