Improving Sentiment Analysis using Negation Scope Detection and Negation Handling

Kartika Makkar, Pardeep Kumar, Monika Poriye, Shalini Aggarwal
{"title":"Improving Sentiment Analysis using Negation Scope Detection and Negation Handling","authors":"Kartika Makkar, Pardeep Kumar, Monika Poriye, Shalini Aggarwal","doi":"10.12785/ijcds/160119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Negation is one of the challenges in sentiment analysis. Negation has an immense influence on how accurately text data can be classified. To find accurate sentiments of users this research identifies that the impact of negations in a sentence needs to be properly handled. Traditional approaches are unable to properly determine the scope of negations. In the proposed approach Machine learning (ML) is used to find the scope of negations. Moreover, the removal of negative stopwords during pre-processing leads to the flipped polarity of sentences. To resolve these challenges this research proposes a method for negation scope detection and handling in sentiment analysis. First, negation cue (negative words) and non cue words are determined, these negation cue and non cue words in addition to lexical and syntactic features determine the negation scope (part of sentence a ff ected by cue) using the Machine Learning (ML) approach i.e. Conditional Random Fields (CRF). Subsequently, in negation handling the sentiment intensity of each token in a sentence is established, and a ff ected tokens are processed to determine the final polarity. It is revealed that sentiment analysis with negation handling and calculated polarity gives 3.61%, 2.64%, 2.7%, and 1.42% increase in accuracy for Logistic regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree (DT), and Naive Bayes (NB) consecutively for Amazon food products dataset. Consecutively, 9.4%, 3%, and 2% improvement for Logistic Regression (LR)","PeriodicalId":37180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems","volume":"11 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12785/ijcds/160119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: Negation is one of the challenges in sentiment analysis. Negation has an immense influence on how accurately text data can be classified. To find accurate sentiments of users this research identifies that the impact of negations in a sentence needs to be properly handled. Traditional approaches are unable to properly determine the scope of negations. In the proposed approach Machine learning (ML) is used to find the scope of negations. Moreover, the removal of negative stopwords during pre-processing leads to the flipped polarity of sentences. To resolve these challenges this research proposes a method for negation scope detection and handling in sentiment analysis. First, negation cue (negative words) and non cue words are determined, these negation cue and non cue words in addition to lexical and syntactic features determine the negation scope (part of sentence a ff ected by cue) using the Machine Learning (ML) approach i.e. Conditional Random Fields (CRF). Subsequently, in negation handling the sentiment intensity of each token in a sentence is established, and a ff ected tokens are processed to determine the final polarity. It is revealed that sentiment analysis with negation handling and calculated polarity gives 3.61%, 2.64%, 2.7%, and 1.42% increase in accuracy for Logistic regression, Support Vector Machine, Decision Tree (DT), and Naive Bayes (NB) consecutively for Amazon food products dataset. Consecutively, 9.4%, 3%, and 2% improvement for Logistic Regression (LR)
利用否定范围检测和否定处理改进情感分析
:否定是情感分析的挑战之一。否定句对文本数据的准确分类有很大影响。为了找到准确的用户情感,这项研究指出,需要正确处理句子中否定词的影响。传统方法无法正确确定否定句的范围。在所提出的方法中,机器学习(ML)被用来查找否定词的范围。此外,在预处理过程中删除否定词会导致句子极性颠倒。为了解决这些难题,本研究提出了一种在情感分析中检测和处理否定范围的方法。首先,确定否定提示词(否定词)和非提示词,这些否定提示词和非提示词除了词法和句法特征外,还使用机器学习(ML)方法,即条件随机场(CRF)确定否定范围(提示词影响的句子部分)。随后,在否定处理过程中,确定句子中每个标记的情感强度,并对被标记进行处理,以确定最终极性。结果表明,在亚马逊食品数据集上,通过否定处理和计算极性进行情感分析,Logistic 回归、支持向量机、决策树(DT)和 Naive Bayes(NB)的准确率分别提高了 3.61%、2.64%、2.7% 和 1.42%。逻辑回归(LR)连续提高了 9.4%、3% 和 2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems
International Journal of Computing and Digital Systems Business, Management and Accounting-Management of Technology and Innovation
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信