Fanny Brawne and Criticism

IF 0.3 2区 文学 0 LITERATURE
Romanticism Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3366/rom.2024.0639
Anahid J. Nersessian
{"title":"Fanny Brawne and Criticism","authors":"Anahid J. Nersessian","doi":"10.3366/rom.2024.0639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the letters and the character of Frances ‘Fanny’ Brawne together as a model for criticism at the present time, as well as a meaningful indication of how criticism was practiced by laypeople in the Romantic period. Focusing on Keats’s great love affair rather than on Keats himself, or on Keats to the exclusion of his interlocuters, I describe the erotic conflict between Brawne and the poet as a form of agonistic engagement between writer and critic–the one tragic in impulse, the other more comic. Toward the end of the essay, I ask how conflict of this kind may be understood, in Stanley Cavell’s terms, not as the ugly underside of love but as one of its most significant expressions, a way of keeping up (in Cavell’s words) ‘the conversation love demands’. Throughout, the essay queries the relation between criticism and love, and how that relation might contest contemporary thinking around affect and pleasure.","PeriodicalId":42939,"journal":{"name":"Romanticism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romanticism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3366/rom.2024.0639","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers the letters and the character of Frances ‘Fanny’ Brawne together as a model for criticism at the present time, as well as a meaningful indication of how criticism was practiced by laypeople in the Romantic period. Focusing on Keats’s great love affair rather than on Keats himself, or on Keats to the exclusion of his interlocuters, I describe the erotic conflict between Brawne and the poet as a form of agonistic engagement between writer and critic–the one tragic in impulse, the other more comic. Toward the end of the essay, I ask how conflict of this kind may be understood, in Stanley Cavell’s terms, not as the ugly underside of love but as one of its most significant expressions, a way of keeping up (in Cavell’s words) ‘the conversation love demands’. Throughout, the essay queries the relation between criticism and love, and how that relation might contest contemporary thinking around affect and pleasure.
范妮-布朗恩与评论
本文将弗朗西丝-"范妮"-布朗恩的书信和人物形象结合在一起,作为当下批评的典范,同时也是浪漫主义时期非专业人士如何进行批评的有意义的说明。我将重点放在济慈的伟大恋情上,而不是济慈本人,也不是济慈而不是他的对话者身上,我将布朗恩与诗人之间的情欲冲突描述为作家与批评家之间的一种冲突形式--一个是悲剧性的冲动,另一个则更具喜剧性。在文章的结尾,我提出这样一个问题:用斯坦利-卡维尔(Stanley Cavell)的话来说,这种冲突如何才能不被理解为爱情丑陋的一面,而被理解为爱情最重要的表现形式之一,是保持(用卡维尔的话说)"爱情所要求的对话 "的一种方式。文章自始至终都在质疑批评与爱之间的关系,以及这种关系如何与当代关于情感和愉悦的思考相抗衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Romanticism
Romanticism LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The most distinguished scholarly journal of its kind edited and published in Britain, Romanticism offers a forum for the flourishing diversity of Romantic studies today. Focusing on the period 1750-1850, it publishes critical, historical, textual and bibliographical essays prepared to the highest scholarly standards, reflecting the full range of current methodological and theoretical debate. With an extensive reviews section, Romanticism constitutes a vital international arena for scholarly debate in this liveliest field of literary studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信