The influence of temperature (up to 120 °C) on the thermal conductivity of variably porous andesite

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Michael J. Heap , Gunel Alizada , David E. Jessop , Ben M. Kennedy , Fabian B. Wadsworth
{"title":"The influence of temperature (up to 120 °C) on the thermal conductivity of variably porous andesite","authors":"Michael J. Heap ,&nbsp;Gunel Alizada ,&nbsp;David E. Jessop ,&nbsp;Ben M. Kennedy ,&nbsp;Fabian B. Wadsworth","doi":"10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2024.108140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The thermal conductivity of volcanic rock is an essential input parameter in a wide range of models designed to better understand volcanic and geothermal processes. However, although volcanoes and geothermal reservoirs are often characterised by temperatures above ambient, laboratory thermal conductivity measurements are often performed at ambient temperature. In addition, there are currently few data on the temperature dependence of thermal conductivity for andesite, a common volcanic rock. Here, we provide elevated-temperature (up to 120 °C) laboratory measurements of thermal conductivity for variably porous (∼0.05 to ∼0.6) and variably glassy andesites from Mt. Ruapheu (New Zealand) using the transient hot-strip method. Our data show that (1) the thermal conductivity of these andesites has little to no temperature dependence and, therefore, (2) there is also no influence of porosity on the temperature dependence of thermal conductivity. We compare our new data with compiled published data to show that the thermal conductivity of volcanic rocks may decrease, remain constant, or increase as a function of temperature. We show that the thermal conductivity of amorphous glass and crystalline material increase and decrease, respectively, as temperature increases. We therefore interpret the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of volcanic rock to be dependent on glass content. The thermal conductivity of the studied andesites, the microstructure of which can be characterised by phenocrysts within a variably glassy groundmass, has little to no temperature dependence because the decrease in the thermal conductivity of the crystalline materials, due to decreases in lattice thermal conductivity, is offset by the increase in the thermal conductivity of the amorphous glass. A simple modelling approach, using the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of glass and crystalline material, provides a crystal content of 0.26 for a thermal conductivity independent of temperature, a common crystal content for andesite dome rock. Our findings imply that calculations of heat transfer through partially glassy volcanic rocks need not consider a temperature-dependent thermal conductivity, but that decreases and increases in thermal conductivity with temperature should be expected for fully crystallised or devitrified volcanic rocks and completely glassy volcanic rocks, respectively. We highlight that more experimental studies are now required to assess the evolution of thermal conductivity as a function of temperature in a wide range of volcanic rocks with different crystallinities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","volume":"452 ","pages":"Article 108140"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037702732400132X/pdfft?md5=d825ba056e0393553bbd5bd1de09cf36&pid=1-s2.0-S037702732400132X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S037702732400132X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The thermal conductivity of volcanic rock is an essential input parameter in a wide range of models designed to better understand volcanic and geothermal processes. However, although volcanoes and geothermal reservoirs are often characterised by temperatures above ambient, laboratory thermal conductivity measurements are often performed at ambient temperature. In addition, there are currently few data on the temperature dependence of thermal conductivity for andesite, a common volcanic rock. Here, we provide elevated-temperature (up to 120 °C) laboratory measurements of thermal conductivity for variably porous (∼0.05 to ∼0.6) and variably glassy andesites from Mt. Ruapheu (New Zealand) using the transient hot-strip method. Our data show that (1) the thermal conductivity of these andesites has little to no temperature dependence and, therefore, (2) there is also no influence of porosity on the temperature dependence of thermal conductivity. We compare our new data with compiled published data to show that the thermal conductivity of volcanic rocks may decrease, remain constant, or increase as a function of temperature. We show that the thermal conductivity of amorphous glass and crystalline material increase and decrease, respectively, as temperature increases. We therefore interpret the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of volcanic rock to be dependent on glass content. The thermal conductivity of the studied andesites, the microstructure of which can be characterised by phenocrysts within a variably glassy groundmass, has little to no temperature dependence because the decrease in the thermal conductivity of the crystalline materials, due to decreases in lattice thermal conductivity, is offset by the increase in the thermal conductivity of the amorphous glass. A simple modelling approach, using the temperature dependence of the thermal conductivity of glass and crystalline material, provides a crystal content of 0.26 for a thermal conductivity independent of temperature, a common crystal content for andesite dome rock. Our findings imply that calculations of heat transfer through partially glassy volcanic rocks need not consider a temperature-dependent thermal conductivity, but that decreases and increases in thermal conductivity with temperature should be expected for fully crystallised or devitrified volcanic rocks and completely glassy volcanic rocks, respectively. We highlight that more experimental studies are now required to assess the evolution of thermal conductivity as a function of temperature in a wide range of volcanic rocks with different crystallinities.

温度(最高 120 ℃)对多孔安山岩导热性的影响
火山岩的热导率是一系列旨在更好地了解火山和地热过程的模型的重要输入参数。然而,虽然火山和地热储层的温度通常高于环境温度,但实验室热导率测量通常是在环境温度下进行的。此外,关于安山岩这种常见火山岩的导热系数随温度变化的数据目前也很少。在此,我们采用瞬态热剥离法,对来自新西兰鲁阿普休山(Mt. Ruapheu)的多孔(0.05 ∼ 0.6)和玻璃状安山岩的导热率进行了高温(高达 120 °C)实验室测量。我们的数据表明:(1) 这些安山岩的热导率几乎与温度无关,因此,(2) 孔隙度对热导率的温度依赖性也没有影响。我们将新数据与已公布的汇编数据进行比较,结果表明火山岩的导热率随温度变化可能降低、保持不变或升高。我们的研究表明,随着温度的升高,无定形玻璃和结晶材料的导热率会分别增加和降低。因此,我们认为火山岩导热系数的温度依赖性取决于玻璃含量。所研究的安山岩的微观结构可以用玻璃状基质中的表晶来描述,其热导率几乎与温度无关,因为晶格热导率的降低导致晶体材料热导率的降低,而无定形玻璃热导率的增加抵消了晶格热导率的降低。利用玻璃和晶体材料导热系数的温度依赖性进行简单建模,可得出导热系数与温度无关的晶体含量为 0.26,这是安山岩圆顶岩常见的晶体含量。我们的研究结果表明,计算通过部分玻璃质火山岩的热传导时,无需考虑与温度相关的导热系数,但对于完全结晶或蜕变的火山岩和完全玻璃质火山岩,则应分别考虑导热系数随温度的降低和升高。我们强调,现在需要进行更多的实验研究,以评估各种不同结晶度的火山岩的导热率随温度变化的情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
13.80%
发文量
183
审稿时长
19.7 weeks
期刊介绍: An international research journal with focus on volcanic and geothermal processes and their impact on the environment and society. Submission of papers covering the following aspects of volcanology and geothermal research are encouraged: (1) Geological aspects of volcanic systems: volcano stratigraphy, structure and tectonic influence; eruptive history; evolution of volcanic landforms; eruption style and progress; dispersal patterns of lava and ash; analysis of real-time eruption observations. (2) Geochemical and petrological aspects of volcanic rocks: magma genesis and evolution; crystallization; volatile compositions, solubility, and degassing; volcanic petrography and textural analysis. (3) Hydrology, geochemistry and measurement of volcanic and hydrothermal fluids: volcanic gas emissions; fumaroles and springs; crater lakes; hydrothermal mineralization. (4) Geophysical aspects of volcanic systems: physical properties of volcanic rocks and magmas; heat flow studies; volcano seismology, geodesy and remote sensing. (5) Computational modeling and experimental simulation of magmatic and hydrothermal processes: eruption dynamics; magma transport and storage; plume dynamics and ash dispersal; lava flow dynamics; hydrothermal fluid flow; thermodynamics of aqueous fluids and melts. (6) Volcano hazard and risk research: hazard zonation methodology, development of forecasting tools; assessment techniques for vulnerability and impact.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信