Inoculation of pleural fluid in blood culture bottles could be a routine practice in pleural infection

Ahmed M. Amer, Maha A. Gad, Azza A. El Akhal
{"title":"Inoculation of pleural fluid in blood culture bottles could be a routine practice in pleural infection","authors":"Ahmed M. Amer, Maha A. Gad, Azza A. El Akhal","doi":"10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_16_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n Worldwide, pleural infections are becoming more common. Overuse of empirical antibiotics has been linked to longer hospital stays and higher death rates, causing the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. So, proper care requires the identification of the pathogenic bacteria using pleural fluid culture. In addition to normal culture, pleural fluid inoculation in blood culture bottles enhances the proportion of patients with detectable infections in less time.\n \n \n \n To assess whether inoculating pleural fluid into a blood culture bottle will increase the yield of isolated pathogens compared to routine culture techniques in evaluating pleural infection. Also, to compare the time of pathogen detection when comparing the detection by blood culture bottle versus the routine microbiological culture technique. Recognize the distribution of isolated bacteria from our center and their susceptibility profile to different antibiotics and predict the most effective empirical antibiotics.\n \n \n \n Cross-sectional analytical prospective study conducted at the Department of Pulmonology and Clinical Pathology in Cairo University Hospitals. It included 70 patients with infected pleural effusion. Under ultrasound supervision, pleural fluid was extracted and transported to the laboratory for routine microbiological culture. At the same time, an automated blood culture bottle was inoculated with 5–10 ml to be incubated. All the detected pathogens were identified and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility according to CLSI.\n \n \n \n The mean age of our patients was 47.1 ± 15.6 years. Empyema was documented in 16 (22.9%) of our patients, whereas 54 (77.1%) had exudative pleural effusion. Positive aerobic infection in blood culture bottle was seen in 37 patients, compared to 21 patients in direct pleural culture. A statistically significant difference was found between the culture positive rate in aerobic blood culture bottles and direct pleural culture (P=0.001).\n \n \n \n Blood culture bottle inoculation of infected pleural fluid increases the sensitivity of microbial yield in a shorter time than standard culture.\n","PeriodicalId":519530,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","volume":"209 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Chest Diseases and Tuberculosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ecdt.ecdt_16_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide, pleural infections are becoming more common. Overuse of empirical antibiotics has been linked to longer hospital stays and higher death rates, causing the emergence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens. So, proper care requires the identification of the pathogenic bacteria using pleural fluid culture. In addition to normal culture, pleural fluid inoculation in blood culture bottles enhances the proportion of patients with detectable infections in less time. To assess whether inoculating pleural fluid into a blood culture bottle will increase the yield of isolated pathogens compared to routine culture techniques in evaluating pleural infection. Also, to compare the time of pathogen detection when comparing the detection by blood culture bottle versus the routine microbiological culture technique. Recognize the distribution of isolated bacteria from our center and their susceptibility profile to different antibiotics and predict the most effective empirical antibiotics. Cross-sectional analytical prospective study conducted at the Department of Pulmonology and Clinical Pathology in Cairo University Hospitals. It included 70 patients with infected pleural effusion. Under ultrasound supervision, pleural fluid was extracted and transported to the laboratory for routine microbiological culture. At the same time, an automated blood culture bottle was inoculated with 5–10 ml to be incubated. All the detected pathogens were identified and tested for antimicrobial susceptibility according to CLSI. The mean age of our patients was 47.1 ± 15.6 years. Empyema was documented in 16 (22.9%) of our patients, whereas 54 (77.1%) had exudative pleural effusion. Positive aerobic infection in blood culture bottle was seen in 37 patients, compared to 21 patients in direct pleural culture. A statistically significant difference was found between the culture positive rate in aerobic blood culture bottles and direct pleural culture (P=0.001). Blood culture bottle inoculation of infected pleural fluid increases the sensitivity of microbial yield in a shorter time than standard culture.
在血液培养瓶中接种胸腔积液可作为胸膜感染的常规做法
在全球范围内,胸膜感染越来越常见。经验性抗生素的过度使用与住院时间延长和死亡率升高有关,并导致耐抗生素病原体的出现。因此,正确的护理需要通过胸腔积液培养来确定致病菌。除普通培养外,将胸腔积液接种到血培养瓶中可在更短时间内提高可检测到感染的患者比例。 在评估胸膜感染时,与常规培养技术相比,评估将胸腔液接种到血液培养瓶中是否会提高分离病原体的产量。此外,比较血液培养瓶检测与常规微生物培养技术检测病原体的时间。了解本中心分离细菌的分布及其对不同抗生素的敏感性,并预测最有效的经验性抗生素。 横断面分析前瞻性研究在开罗大学医院肺病学和临床病理学系进行。其中包括 70 名感染性胸腔积液患者。在超声监护下,胸腔积液被抽取并运送到实验室进行常规微生物培养。同时,在自动血液培养瓶中接种 5-10 毫升进行培养。所有检测到的病原体均按照 CLSI 标准进行了鉴定和抗菌药物敏感性测试。 患者的平均年龄为(47.1 ± 15.6)岁。16名患者(22.9%)出现气胸,54名患者(77.1%)出现渗出性胸腔积液。37名患者的血培养瓶中出现需氧菌感染阳性,而直接胸膜培养阳性的患者有21名。需氧血培养瓶培养阳性率与直接胸膜培养阳性率之间的差异有统计学意义(P=0.001)。 与标准培养相比,血培养瓶接种感染胸腔积液可在更短时间内提高微生物产量的敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信