“Surely There Is God in This Place”: Ugaritic ỉṯt and Hebrew [inline-graphic 01i] Reconsidered in Light of Kirta’s Vow ( KTU 1.14 IV 38)

Yitzhaq Feder, Tania Notarius
{"title":"“Surely There Is God in This Place”: Ugaritic ỉṯt and Hebrew [inline-graphic 01i] Reconsidered in Light of Kirta’s Vow ( KTU 1.14 IV 38)","authors":"Yitzhaq Feder, Tania Notarius","doi":"10.1353/cbq.2024.a931731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: In this article we examine the meaning of the Ugaritic term ỉṯt and its implications for Ugaritic and biblical lexicography in light of ancient Near Eastern vowing practices. We reevaluate the association of ỉṯt with vows and its influential translation as “gift,” which has served as the basis for viewing it as etymologically related to the biblical offering term ʾ iššeh. Our analysis reveals that all of the nonfragmentary attestations of ỉṯt can be convincingly understood as conjugated forms of the verb of existence ỉṯ . This understanding sets the stage for a new interpretation of its appearance in Kirta’s vow ( KTU 3 1.14 IV 38) as a reference to the divine presence at the moment of vow making, a reading that is corroborated by a wide body of ancient Near Eastern votive inscriptions and literary texts in which statements of divine presence are explicit. Based on this analysis, it becomes clear that the Ugaritic data are not relevant to understanding the biblical term [inline-graphic 02i] (ʾ iššeh ), which can only be elucidated based on its contextual evidence. In the final part of the article, we address challenges to the traditional interpretation of [inline-graphic 03i] as a “fire-offering” and show how this has led to a widespread misunderstanding of this term.","PeriodicalId":424111,"journal":{"name":"The Catholic Biblical Quarterly","volume":"23 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Catholic Biblical Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/cbq.2024.a931731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: In this article we examine the meaning of the Ugaritic term ỉṯt and its implications for Ugaritic and biblical lexicography in light of ancient Near Eastern vowing practices. We reevaluate the association of ỉṯt with vows and its influential translation as “gift,” which has served as the basis for viewing it as etymologically related to the biblical offering term ʾ iššeh. Our analysis reveals that all of the nonfragmentary attestations of ỉṯt can be convincingly understood as conjugated forms of the verb of existence ỉṯ . This understanding sets the stage for a new interpretation of its appearance in Kirta’s vow ( KTU 3 1.14 IV 38) as a reference to the divine presence at the moment of vow making, a reading that is corroborated by a wide body of ancient Near Eastern votive inscriptions and literary texts in which statements of divine presence are explicit. Based on this analysis, it becomes clear that the Ugaritic data are not relevant to understanding the biblical term [inline-graphic 02i] (ʾ iššeh ), which can only be elucidated based on its contextual evidence. In the final part of the article, we address challenges to the traditional interpretation of [inline-graphic 03i] as a “fire-offering” and show how this has led to a widespread misunderstanding of this term.
"这个地方肯定有神":从基尔塔的誓言(KTU 1.14 IV 38)重新审视乌加利文ỉṯt 和希伯来文 [inline-graphic 01i]
摘要:在本文中,我们根据古代近东地区的誓约习俗,研究了乌加利语中ỉṯt 一词的含义及其对乌加利语和圣经词汇学的影响。我们重新评估了ỉṯt 与誓言的关联及其作为 "礼物 "的有影响力的译法,这种译法是将其视为与圣经中的献祭词 ʾ iššeh 在词源学上相关的依据。我们的分析表明,ỉṯt 的所有非片段证明都可以令人信服地理解为存在动词 ỉṯ 的连接形式。这种理解为我们对基尔塔誓言(KTU 3 1.14 IV 38)中出现的ỉṯt 的新解释奠定了基础,即它指的是发誓时的神性存在,这种解读得到了大量古代近东祭祀碑文和文学文本的证实,在这些文本中,神性存在的表述是明确的。根据上述分析,乌加里特人的资料显然与理解圣经中的术语 [inline-graphic 02i](ʾ iššeh )无关,只有根据其上下文证据才能对其进行阐释。在文章的最后一部分,我们探讨了传统上将[inline-graphic 03i]解释为 "火祭 "的观点所面临的挑战,并说明了这种解释是如何导致对该术语的广泛误解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信