The survival and complication profiles of the Compress® Endoprosthesis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract

Background/purpose

This study aimed to summarize the survival and complication profiles of the compress® endoprosthesis (CPS) through a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

Online databases (PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) were searched from inception to November 2023. Trials were included that involved the use of CPS for endoprosthetic replacement in patients with massive segmental bone defects. Patients’ clinical characteristics and demographic data were extracted using a standardized form. The methodological quality of included 13 non-comparative studies was assessed on basis of the Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS). All the available Kaplan-Meier curves in the included studies were digitized and combined using Engauge-Digitizer software and the R Project for Statistical Computing.

Results

The meta-analysis of thirteen included studies indicated: the all-cause failure rates of CPS were 26.3 % after surgery, in which the occurrence rates of aseptic loosening were 5.8 %. And the incidences of other complications were as follows: soft tissue failure (1.8 %), structure failure (8.2 %), infection (9.5 %), tumor progression (1.1 %). The 1-, 4-, and 8-year overall survival rates for all-cause failure with 95 % CI were 89 % (86 %-92 %), 75 % (71 %-79 %) and 65 % (60 %-70 %), respectively. The estimated mean survival time of all-cause failure was 145 months (95 % CI, 127–148 months), and the estimated median survival time of all-cause failure was 187 months (95 % CI, 135–198 months). The 1-, 4-, and 8-year overall survival rates of aseptic loosening with 95 % CI were 96 % (94 %-98 %), 91 % (87 %-95 %) and 88 % (83 %-93 %), respectively. The estimated mean survival time of aseptic loosening was 148 months (95 % CI, 137–153 months).

Conclusion

CPS’s innovative spring system promotes bone ingrowth by providing immediate and high-compression fixation, thereby reducing the risk of aseptic loosening caused by stress shielding and particle-induced osteolysis. CPS requires less residual bone mass for reconstructing massive segmental bone defects and facilitates easier revision due to its non-cemented fixation. In addition, the survival rate, estimated mean survival time, and complication rates of CPS are not inferior to those of common endoprosthesis.