Chasing cancer: does the social-to-medical spending ratio relate to cancer incidence and mortality in Canadian provinces? A retrospective cohort study

Cameron MacLellan, Paul Kershaw, Ronald D Kneebone, Lindsay McLaren, Tony Reiman, Robin Urquhart, Daniel J Dutton
{"title":"Chasing cancer: does the social-to-medical spending ratio relate to cancer incidence and mortality in Canadian provinces? A retrospective cohort study","authors":"Cameron MacLellan, Paul Kershaw, Ronald D Kneebone, Lindsay McLaren, Tony Reiman, Robin Urquhart, Daniel J Dutton","doi":"10.1136/bmjph-2023-000858","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancer is the leading cause of death in Canada, and cases are expected to rise by 83% between 2012 and 2042. Jurisdictions with higher ratios of social-to-medical spending exhibit better population health outcomes; however, the connection between the ratio and both cancer incidence and mortality is not well established. We aim to determine the association between the ratio and both age-standardised cancer incidence and mortality.Using linear regressions with provincial and yearly fixed effects, we measured associations between the ratio and incidence of the four most common cancers in Canada (ie, lung and bronchus, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer), and mortality from any cancer, from 1992 to 2017 (incidence) and 2000 to 2019 (mortality).A one-cent increase in social spending for each dollar spent on medical services was significantly associated with a decrease in colorectal (−0.2%), breast (−0.1%), and prostate cancer (−0.6%). The relationship is statistically insignificant and negligible for lung cancer incidence and cancer mortality.The ratio was significantly associated with a decrease in three out of four cancer incidence categories, but not mortality. This implies that, consistent with the social determinants of health, preventing cancer incidence might be a function of social spending, whereas medical spending is more relevant for individuals already diagnosed with cancer. This analysis points to the importance of a health-in-all-policies perspective, as social spending might be more important for population health than spending on the medical care system. We provide evidence that morbidity measures are responsive to the ratio, building on a literature focused on mortality.","PeriodicalId":117861,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Public Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjph-2023-000858","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer is the leading cause of death in Canada, and cases are expected to rise by 83% between 2012 and 2042. Jurisdictions with higher ratios of social-to-medical spending exhibit better population health outcomes; however, the connection between the ratio and both cancer incidence and mortality is not well established. We aim to determine the association between the ratio and both age-standardised cancer incidence and mortality.Using linear regressions with provincial and yearly fixed effects, we measured associations between the ratio and incidence of the four most common cancers in Canada (ie, lung and bronchus, colorectal, breast and prostate cancer), and mortality from any cancer, from 1992 to 2017 (incidence) and 2000 to 2019 (mortality).A one-cent increase in social spending for each dollar spent on medical services was significantly associated with a decrease in colorectal (−0.2%), breast (−0.1%), and prostate cancer (−0.6%). The relationship is statistically insignificant and negligible for lung cancer incidence and cancer mortality.The ratio was significantly associated with a decrease in three out of four cancer incidence categories, but not mortality. This implies that, consistent with the social determinants of health, preventing cancer incidence might be a function of social spending, whereas medical spending is more relevant for individuals already diagnosed with cancer. This analysis points to the importance of a health-in-all-policies perspective, as social spending might be more important for population health than spending on the medical care system. We provide evidence that morbidity measures are responsive to the ratio, building on a literature focused on mortality.
追逐癌症:加拿大各省的社会医疗支出比率与癌症发病率和死亡率有关吗?一项回顾性队列研究
癌症是加拿大人的首要死因,2012 年至 2042 年间,癌症病例预计将增加 83%。社会支出与医疗支出比率较高的辖区,其人口健康状况较好;然而,该比率与癌症发病率和死亡率之间的关系尚未得到很好的证实。我们使用带有省和年度固定效应的线性回归,测算了 1992 年至 2017 年(发病率)和 2000 年至 2019 年(死亡率)社会医疗支出与加拿大四种最常见癌症(即肺癌和支气管癌、结肠直肠癌、乳腺癌和前列腺癌)的发病率以及任何癌症的死亡率之间的关系。在医疗服务上每花费一美元,社会支出就会增加一美分,这与结直肠癌(-0.2%)、乳腺癌(-0.1%)和前列腺癌(-0.6%)的发病率下降有显著关系。该比率与四种癌症中三种癌症发病率的下降有明显关系,但与死亡率的下降无关。这意味着,与健康的社会决定因素相一致,预防癌症发病可能是社会支出的一项功能,而医疗支出与已确诊癌症的个人更为相关。这一分析表明了将健康纳入所有政策的观点的重要性,因为对于人口健康而言,社会支出可能比医疗系统支出更为重要。在以死亡率为重点的文献基础上,我们提供了发病率衡量标准对该比率具有反应性的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信