ARE ALARM BELLS RINGING IN ACADEMIA? CHATGPT AS A SAMPLE OF USING CHATBOTS IN EDUCATION

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Gürhan Durak, Serkan Cankaya
{"title":"ARE ALARM BELLS RINGING IN ACADEMIA? CHATGPT AS A SAMPLE OF USING CHATBOTS IN EDUCATION","authors":"Gürhan Durak, Serkan Cankaya","doi":"10.17718/tojde.1353737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main aim of this mixed methods study is to determine the evaluations made by academics on an academic text generated with ChatGPT and get their general views on ChatGPT. The convergent parallel design is utilized where the qualitative and quantitative methods are combined to produce triangulated results. Data were collected via an online form from 45 academics. Academics were asked to read and rate the sample text generated by ChatGPT. The titles “Writing rules,” “Language and expression,” and “Subject integrity” of the text generated by ChatGPT received the highest ratings from the academics. The qualitative findings obtained were interpreted within the framework of the “Diffusion of Innovations” and “Uses and Gratifications” theories, and the related themes were formed. As a result, the participants were asked about their feelings about using ChatGPT, and the themes of astonishment, pessimism, anxiety, and hopefulness emerged. Participants were asked their opinions about the benefits and negative aspects of using ChatGPT. Themes emerged under the benefits, and negative aspects titles were evaluated. Finally, the other themes that emerged under the satisfaction with ChatGPT and making ChatGPT widespread titles were assessed.","PeriodicalId":46002,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17718/tojde.1353737","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main aim of this mixed methods study is to determine the evaluations made by academics on an academic text generated with ChatGPT and get their general views on ChatGPT. The convergent parallel design is utilized where the qualitative and quantitative methods are combined to produce triangulated results. Data were collected via an online form from 45 academics. Academics were asked to read and rate the sample text generated by ChatGPT. The titles “Writing rules,” “Language and expression,” and “Subject integrity” of the text generated by ChatGPT received the highest ratings from the academics. The qualitative findings obtained were interpreted within the framework of the “Diffusion of Innovations” and “Uses and Gratifications” theories, and the related themes were formed. As a result, the participants were asked about their feelings about using ChatGPT, and the themes of astonishment, pessimism, anxiety, and hopefulness emerged. Participants were asked their opinions about the benefits and negative aspects of using ChatGPT. Themes emerged under the benefits, and negative aspects titles were evaluated. Finally, the other themes that emerged under the satisfaction with ChatGPT and making ChatGPT widespread titles were assessed.
学术界的警钟是否已经敲响?作为在教育领域使用聊天机器人的一个示例,chatgpt
这项混合方法研究的主要目的是确定学者们对使用 ChatGPT 生成的学术文本的评价,并了解他们对 ChatGPT 的总体看法。研究采用收敛平行设计,将定性和定量方法结合起来,得出三角测量结果。我们通过在线表格收集了 45 位学者的数据。学者们被要求阅读 ChatGPT 生成的样本文本并进行评分。由 ChatGPT 生成的文本的标题 "写作规则"、"语言与表达 "和 "主题完整性 "获得了学者们的最高评分。我们在 "创新扩散 "和 "使用与收益 "理论的框架下对定性研究结果进行了解释,并形成了相关主题。结果,参与者被问及使用 ChatGPT 的感受,并出现了惊讶、悲观、焦虑和希望等主题。参与者被问及对使用 ChatGPT 的好处和负面影响的看法。在益处和消极方面的标题下出现了一些主题,并对这些主题进行了评估。最后,评估了在 "对 ChatGPT 的满意度 "和 "普及 ChatGPT "标题下出现的其他主题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education
Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE) is a peer-reviewed quarterly e-journal. International in scope, this scholarly e-journal publishes refereed articles focusing on the issues and challenges of providing theory, research and information services to global learners in any kind of distance education or open learning applications. TOJDE will particularly strive to meet the continuing education needs of practitioners and educators by providing a forum for the discussion of extended learning strategies, policies and practices, and trends in information technology as they impact the delivery of student support services for distance learners and faculties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信