Experimental investigation on seeping gas film effectiveness in supersonic flow downstream of a porous injector

IF 2.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
Q. Mi, W.P. Zheng, S.H. Yi, D.D. Gang, X.G. Lu
{"title":"Experimental investigation on seeping gas film effectiveness in supersonic flow downstream of a porous injector","authors":"Q. Mi,&nbsp;W.P. Zheng,&nbsp;S.H. Yi,&nbsp;D.D. Gang,&nbsp;X.G. Lu","doi":"10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2024.111267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Based on seepage flow through porous media, the seeping gas film cooling method is an effective means to protect large areas of optical windows and other hot components of hypersonic vehicles. Here, the pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) technique was applied and experiments were conducted on seeping gas film effectiveness downstream of a porous injector. A Mach 3 wind tunnel was used to explore the influence of different cooling gas blowing ratios, gas types, and incoming boundary-layer conditions on film effectiveness. Results show film effectiveness decreases monotonically along the downstream wall; however, with blowing ratio increases the film effectiveness increases linearly. Once the blowing ratio exceeds 0.4% film effectiveness ascends nonlinearly, indicating that the contribution to film effectiveness per unit mass flow-rate promotion gradually decreases. In contrast, the non-uniformity of the film coverage on the downstream wall in the spanwise direction becomes more significant at a higher blowing ratio. For the same blowing ratio, helium, with a low molecular weight has a higher film effectiveness compared to nitrogen and carbon dioxide. With blowing ratio less than 0.4 %, the film effectiveness downstream of the porous injector under laminar flow conditions is almost twice that of turbulent flow. However, with blowing ratio above 0.5 %, the growth rate of the film effectiveness decreases dramatically to 50 %. Preliminary analysis suggests that this is caused by the complete transition of the laminar boundary layer to turbulent flow after passing through the porous wall under high blowing ratios, where the mixing effect of turbulence is fully manifest.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12294,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science","volume":"159 ","pages":"Article 111267"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894177724001365","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on seepage flow through porous media, the seeping gas film cooling method is an effective means to protect large areas of optical windows and other hot components of hypersonic vehicles. Here, the pressure-sensitive paint (PSP) technique was applied and experiments were conducted on seeping gas film effectiveness downstream of a porous injector. A Mach 3 wind tunnel was used to explore the influence of different cooling gas blowing ratios, gas types, and incoming boundary-layer conditions on film effectiveness. Results show film effectiveness decreases monotonically along the downstream wall; however, with blowing ratio increases the film effectiveness increases linearly. Once the blowing ratio exceeds 0.4% film effectiveness ascends nonlinearly, indicating that the contribution to film effectiveness per unit mass flow-rate promotion gradually decreases. In contrast, the non-uniformity of the film coverage on the downstream wall in the spanwise direction becomes more significant at a higher blowing ratio. For the same blowing ratio, helium, with a low molecular weight has a higher film effectiveness compared to nitrogen and carbon dioxide. With blowing ratio less than 0.4 %, the film effectiveness downstream of the porous injector under laminar flow conditions is almost twice that of turbulent flow. However, with blowing ratio above 0.5 %, the growth rate of the film effectiveness decreases dramatically to 50 %. Preliminary analysis suggests that this is caused by the complete transition of the laminar boundary layer to turbulent flow after passing through the porous wall under high blowing ratios, where the mixing effect of turbulence is fully manifest.

多孔喷射器下游超音速气流中渗出气膜有效性的实验研究
基于多孔介质的渗流,渗流气膜冷却方法是保护高超音速飞行器大面积光学窗口和其他热部件的有效手段。本文应用压敏涂料(PSP)技术,对多孔喷射器下游的渗流气膜效果进行了实验。实验采用马赫数为 3 的风洞,探讨了不同冷却气体吹气比、气体类型和进入边界层条件对薄膜效果的影响。结果表明,薄膜效果沿下游壁单调递减;然而,随着吹气比的增加,薄膜效果呈线性增长。当吹气比超过 0.4% 时,薄膜效率呈非线性上升,这表明单位质量流量对薄膜效率的贡献逐渐降低。相反,当吹气比越大时,下游壁上薄膜在跨度方向上覆盖的不均匀性就越明显。在相同的吹气比下,与氮气和二氧化碳相比,低分子量的氦气具有更高的薄膜效率。当吹气比小于 0.4 % 时,层流条件下多孔喷射器下游的膜效率几乎是紊流条件下的两倍。然而,当吹气比高于 0.5 % 时,薄膜效率的增长率急剧下降至 50 %。初步分析表明,这是由于在高吹气比条件下,层流边界层穿过多孔壁后完全过渡到湍流,湍流的混合效应在此得到充分体现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 工程技术-工程:机械
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
159
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science provides a forum for research emphasizing experimental work that enhances fundamental understanding of heat transfer, thermodynamics, and fluid mechanics. In addition to the principal areas of research, the journal covers research results in related fields, including combined heat and mass transfer, flows with phase transition, micro- and nano-scale systems, multiphase flow, combustion, radiative transfer, porous media, cryogenics, turbulence, and novel experimental techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信