Atrial Anatomical Variations on Computed Tomography Angiography Associated with Atrial Fibrillation and Those Predicting Recurrence Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation

R. Abazid, Osama Smettie, J. Romsa, J. Warrington, C. Akincioglu, Nikolaos Tzemos, W. Vezina, H. Khan
{"title":"Atrial Anatomical Variations on Computed Tomography Angiography Associated with Atrial Fibrillation and Those Predicting Recurrence Following Pulmonary Vein Isolation","authors":"R. Abazid, Osama Smettie, J. Romsa, J. Warrington, C. Akincioglu, Nikolaos Tzemos, W. Vezina, H. Khan","doi":"10.1093/radadv/umae016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n We aim to investigate the atrial anatomical variations in patients with and without atrial fibrillation (AF) using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and identify features associated with AF recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation.\n \n \n \n We retrospectively reviewed 502 CCTAs of patients with AF performed prior to a pulmonary vein isolation procedure with 1058 CCTAs of patients without AF performed to rule out coronary artery disease between 2014 and 2017. Anatomical variations of both atria including left atrial diverticula (LAD), right atrial diverticula (RAD), Bachmann bundle shunt (BBS) and pulmonary vein anatomy were assessed.\n \n \n \n We found that patients with AF were older (67±14 vs. 63±13 years, P = 0.039), had a higher prevalence of diabetes (24.4%) vs (14.7%), P = 0.006, and cerebrovascular accidents (3.8%) vs. (0.9%), P = 0.044 when compared with patients without AF. Furthermore, on CCTAs patients with AF demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of BBS (11% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001), LAD (19% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001), and RAD (9.8% vs. 2.1%, P < 0.001) when compared to patients without AF. Logistic multivariable regression analyses of CCTA findings demonstrated increased Odd Ratios (OR) in those with AF of BBS (OR = 3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.32–5.35, P < 0.001), LAD (OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 2.12–4.07, P < 0.001), RAD (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.19–2.11, P = 0.03), LA diameter (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.65-3.39, P < 0.001). Importantly, multivariate Cox regression showed that the LA dimension is a predictor of AF recurrence (HR = 1.019, 95% CI = 1.001-1.051, P = 0.02).\n \n \n \n AF patients have a higher prevalence of BBS, LAD, and RAD in comparison to patients without AF. Mean LA diameter predicts AF recurrence after the pulmonary vein isolation procedure.\n","PeriodicalId":519940,"journal":{"name":"Radiology advances","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology advances","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/radadv/umae016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We aim to investigate the atrial anatomical variations in patients with and without atrial fibrillation (AF) using cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) and identify features associated with AF recurrence following pulmonary vein isolation. We retrospectively reviewed 502 CCTAs of patients with AF performed prior to a pulmonary vein isolation procedure with 1058 CCTAs of patients without AF performed to rule out coronary artery disease between 2014 and 2017. Anatomical variations of both atria including left atrial diverticula (LAD), right atrial diverticula (RAD), Bachmann bundle shunt (BBS) and pulmonary vein anatomy were assessed. We found that patients with AF were older (67±14 vs. 63±13 years, P = 0.039), had a higher prevalence of diabetes (24.4%) vs (14.7%), P = 0.006, and cerebrovascular accidents (3.8%) vs. (0.9%), P = 0.044 when compared with patients without AF. Furthermore, on CCTAs patients with AF demonstrated a significantly higher prevalence of BBS (11% vs. 4.1%, P < 0.001), LAD (19% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001), and RAD (9.8% vs. 2.1%, P < 0.001) when compared to patients without AF. Logistic multivariable regression analyses of CCTA findings demonstrated increased Odd Ratios (OR) in those with AF of BBS (OR = 3.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.32–5.35, P < 0.001), LAD (OR = 2.94, 95% CI = 2.12–4.07, P < 0.001), RAD (OR = 1.54, 95% CI = 1.19–2.11, P = 0.03), LA diameter (OR = 2.42, 95% CI = 1.65-3.39, P < 0.001). Importantly, multivariate Cox regression showed that the LA dimension is a predictor of AF recurrence (HR = 1.019, 95% CI = 1.001-1.051, P = 0.02). AF patients have a higher prevalence of BBS, LAD, and RAD in comparison to patients without AF. Mean LA diameter predicts AF recurrence after the pulmonary vein isolation procedure.
计算机断层扫描血管造影上与心房颤动有关的心房解剖变异以及预测肺静脉隔离术后复发的心房解剖变异
我们旨在利用心脏计算机断层扫描血管造影术(CCTA)研究心房颤动(房颤)患者和无房颤患者的心房解剖变异,并确定肺静脉隔离术后房颤复发的相关特征。 我们回顾性地查看了在肺静脉隔离术前对房颤患者进行的 502 例 CCTA 和 2014 年至 2017 年间为排除冠状动脉疾病而对无房颤患者进行的 1058 例 CCTA。我们评估了两个心房的解剖变异,包括左心房憩室(LAD)、右心房憩室(RAD)、巴赫曼束分流(BBS)和肺静脉解剖。 我们发现,与无房颤患者相比,房颤患者年龄更大(67±14 岁 vs. 63±13 岁,P = 0.039),糖尿病患病率更高(24.4% vs. 14.7%,P = 0.006),脑血管意外患病率更高(3.8% vs. 0.9%,P = 0.044)。此外,与无房颤患者相比,房颤患者的 CCTAs 显示 BBS(11% vs. 4.1%,P < 0.001)、LAD(19% vs. 7.7%,P < 0.001)和 RAD(9.8% vs. 2.1%,P < 0.001)患病率明显更高。对 CCTA 结果的逻辑多变量回归分析表明,BBS(OR = 3.51,95% 置信区间 (CI) = 2.32-5.35,P < 0.001)、LAD(OR = 2.94,95% CI = 2.12-4.07,P < 0.001)、RAD(OR = 1.54,95% CI = 1.19-2.11,P = 0.03)、LA 直径(OR = 2.42,95% CI = 1.65-3.39,P < 0.001)。重要的是,多变量 Cox 回归显示,LA 尺寸是房颤复发的预测因子(HR = 1.019,95% CI = 1.001-1.051,P = 0.02)。 与非房颤患者相比,房颤患者的 BBS、LAD 和 RAD 患病率更高。平均 LA 直径可预测肺静脉隔离术后房颤的复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信