Crumbling Cookie Categories: Deconstructing Common Cookie Categories to Create Categories that People Understand

Soha Jiwani, Rachna Sasheendran, Adhishree Abhyankar, E. Bouma-Sims, Lorrie Cranor
{"title":"Crumbling Cookie Categories: Deconstructing Common Cookie Categories to Create Categories that People Understand","authors":"Soha Jiwani, Rachna Sasheendran, Adhishree Abhyankar, E. Bouma-Sims, Lorrie Cranor","doi":"10.56553/popets-2024-0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Users of online services often encounter cookie banners that ask them to consent to different categories of cookies. Frequently, these categories are labelled using the four categories defined by the 2012 Cookie Guide from the UK's International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). However, prior research suggests that users have difficulty understanding what these category labels actually mean. We conducted a four-part study to identify labels that more intuitively convey the four cookie categories. First, we crowd sourced new category labels. We then evaluated users' comprehension and sentiment towards the labels in a series of surveys focused on definitions and hypothetical scenarios. Finally, we selected a new slate of category labels based on the results of the prior surveys, and conducted a between-subjects, online behavioral experiment to compare the new slate with the original labels. We ultimately recommend that the industry adopt the category label ``anonymous analytics cookies'' in lieu of the term ``performance cookies'' and ``extra functionality cookies'' instead of ``functional cookies.'' Adopting our recommended terms would both improve the usability of current cookie consent interfaces and any future privacy consent mechanisms that use the same categorization. We also recommend revisiting the categories themselves as the distinctions between these categories do not seem to be well understood and may not reflect useful distinctions for privacy decision making.","PeriodicalId":519525,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56553/popets-2024-0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Users of online services often encounter cookie banners that ask them to consent to different categories of cookies. Frequently, these categories are labelled using the four categories defined by the 2012 Cookie Guide from the UK's International Chamber of Commerce (ICC). However, prior research suggests that users have difficulty understanding what these category labels actually mean. We conducted a four-part study to identify labels that more intuitively convey the four cookie categories. First, we crowd sourced new category labels. We then evaluated users' comprehension and sentiment towards the labels in a series of surveys focused on definitions and hypothetical scenarios. Finally, we selected a new slate of category labels based on the results of the prior surveys, and conducted a between-subjects, online behavioral experiment to compare the new slate with the original labels. We ultimately recommend that the industry adopt the category label ``anonymous analytics cookies'' in lieu of the term ``performance cookies'' and ``extra functionality cookies'' instead of ``functional cookies.'' Adopting our recommended terms would both improve the usability of current cookie consent interfaces and any future privacy consent mechanisms that use the same categorization. We also recommend revisiting the categories themselves as the distinctions between these categories do not seem to be well understood and may not reflect useful distinctions for privacy decision making.
破碎的饼干分类:解构常见饼干类别,创建人们能够理解的类别
在线服务用户经常会遇到 cookie 横幅,要求他们同意接受不同类别的 cookie。这些类别通常使用英国国际商会(ICC)2012 年《Cookie 指南》中定义的四个类别进行标注。然而,先前的研究表明,用户很难理解这些类别标签的实际含义。我们进行了一项由四个部分组成的研究,以确定能更直观地表达四种 cookie 类别的标签。首先,我们从人群中寻找新的类别标签。然后,我们通过一系列以定义和假设情景为重点的调查,评估了用户对这些标签的理解和情感。最后,我们根据之前的调查结果选择了一系列新的类别标签,并进行了一次主体间在线行为实验,将新标签与原有标签进行比较。我们最终建议业界采用 "匿名分析 Cookie "类别标签来取代 "性能 Cookie",并采用 "额外功能 Cookie "来取代 "功能 Cookie"。采用我们建议的术语既能提高当前 Cookie 同意界面的可用性,也能提高未来使用相同分类的隐私同意机制的可用性。我们还建议重新审视这些类别本身,因为这些类别之间的区别似乎没有得到很好的理解,而且可能没有反映出对隐私决策有用的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信