Association of social vulnerability and rehospitalization in pediatric motor vehicle trauma patients

Meagan Rosenberg , Alexander Knee , Aixa Perez Coulte , Michael V. Tirabassi
{"title":"Association of social vulnerability and rehospitalization in pediatric motor vehicle trauma patients","authors":"Meagan Rosenberg ,&nbsp;Alexander Knee ,&nbsp;Aixa Perez Coulte ,&nbsp;Michael V. Tirabassi","doi":"10.1016/j.yjpso.2024.100161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>We investigated social vulnerability index (SVI) as a tool to identify children at risk for readmission following motor vehicle collisions (MVC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><p>An exploratory retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric trauma activations (age 0–15) for MVCs 1/1/2012 to 6/30/2022 at a level 1 trauma center. Eligibility included residence within our center's catchment area. Excluded were mortalities during the index admission. Patient address was geocoded and linked with state-level census tract SVI. Per the CDC, SVI ≥90th percentile defined high vulnerability. We evaluated SVI theme: socioeconomic status (SES), household composition and disability (HCD), minority status and language (MSL), housing and transportation (HT). Outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits and re-hospitalization within 90 days of discharge. Kaplan-Meier plots, relative risk (aRR), and 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) adjusted for injury severity score (ISS) were estimated using log-binomial regression.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Of 429 eligible subjects, 122 (28 %) resided in high SVI communities. High SVI patients had slightly higher mean ISS (8.6 vs 7.5). There was a similar risk of ED re-presentation across SVI groups (aRR=1.18; 95 %CI 0.61–2.29). However, although estimates were unstable, there was a possibility of increased risk of re-hospitalization among the high SVI group (aRR=2.34; 95 %CI 0.68–8.04). By theme, HT had the strongest association (aRR=1.71) for ED representation, whereas SES and HCD had the strongest associations for rehospitalization (aRR=2.03, 2.66, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>We observed possible associations between high SVI and higher rates of re-hospitalization. Future research with a larger sample may clarify associations.</p></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><p>Level IV; Prognosis Study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100821,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000467/pdfft?md5=6b69c0987cfa5a18a3f8c0cc58296bd2&pid=1-s2.0-S2949711624000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Surgery Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949711624000467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

We investigated social vulnerability index (SVI) as a tool to identify children at risk for readmission following motor vehicle collisions (MVC).

Materials and Methods

An exploratory retrospective cohort study was conducted of pediatric trauma activations (age 0–15) for MVCs 1/1/2012 to 6/30/2022 at a level 1 trauma center. Eligibility included residence within our center's catchment area. Excluded were mortalities during the index admission. Patient address was geocoded and linked with state-level census tract SVI. Per the CDC, SVI ≥90th percentile defined high vulnerability. We evaluated SVI theme: socioeconomic status (SES), household composition and disability (HCD), minority status and language (MSL), housing and transportation (HT). Outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits and re-hospitalization within 90 days of discharge. Kaplan-Meier plots, relative risk (aRR), and 95 % confidence intervals (95 %CI) adjusted for injury severity score (ISS) were estimated using log-binomial regression.

Results

Of 429 eligible subjects, 122 (28 %) resided in high SVI communities. High SVI patients had slightly higher mean ISS (8.6 vs 7.5). There was a similar risk of ED re-presentation across SVI groups (aRR=1.18; 95 %CI 0.61–2.29). However, although estimates were unstable, there was a possibility of increased risk of re-hospitalization among the high SVI group (aRR=2.34; 95 %CI 0.68–8.04). By theme, HT had the strongest association (aRR=1.71) for ED representation, whereas SES and HCD had the strongest associations for rehospitalization (aRR=2.03, 2.66, respectively).

Conclusion

We observed possible associations between high SVI and higher rates of re-hospitalization. Future research with a larger sample may clarify associations.

Level of Evidence

Level IV; Prognosis Study.

小儿机动车辆外伤患者的社会脆弱性与再住院的关系
导言我们研究了社会脆弱性指数(SVI),将其作为识别机动车碰撞(MVC)后有再入院风险的儿童的工具。材料与方法我们对 1 级创伤中心 2012 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日因机动车碰撞而启动的儿科创伤(0-15 岁)进行了一项探索性回顾性队列研究。研究对象包括居住在本中心服务区内的人员。不包括在索引入院期间死亡的患者。患者地址已进行地理编码,并与州一级人口普查区 SVI 相连。根据美国疾病预防控制中心(CDC)的规定,SVI≥90百分位数即为高脆弱性。我们评估了 SVI 的主题:社会经济地位 (SES)、家庭组成和残疾 (HCD)、少数民族地位和语言 (MSL)、住房和交通 (HT)。结果包括急诊室就诊和出院后 90 天内再次住院。采用对数二项式回归法估算了卡普兰-梅耶图、相对风险 (aRR) 和根据损伤严重程度评分 (ISS) 调整的 95 % 置信区间 (95 %CI)。高 SVI 患者的平均 ISS 略高(8.6 对 7.5)。不同 SVI 组别再次出现 ED 的风险相似(aRR=1.18;95 %CI 0.61-2.29)。不过,虽然估计值不稳定,但高 SVI 组的再住院风险可能会增加(aRR=2.34;95 %CI 0.68-8.04)。结论 我们观察到高 SVI 与较高的再住院率之间可能存在关联。证据级别IV级;预后研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信