Comparative evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration and minimal bactericidal concentration of various herbal irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis

Anjali Surana, Chauhan Priya, Akotiya Bhavya, G. S. Suparna, S. A. Rolly, Manasi Kewlani
{"title":"Comparative evaluation of minimal inhibitory concentration and minimal bactericidal concentration of various herbal irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis","authors":"Anjali Surana, Chauhan Priya, Akotiya Bhavya, G. S. Suparna, S. A. Rolly, Manasi Kewlani","doi":"10.4103/jcde.jcde_349_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n The purpose of this article is to evaluate the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of Herbal Irrigants.\n \n \n \n The aim of the study was to evaluate MIC and MBC of herbal extracts of Azadirachta indica, Curcuma longa, and Green Tea Against Enterococcus faecalis.\n \n \n \n The MIC and MBC of extracts of A\n . indica (neem), C. longa (turmeric), and Green Tea were evaluated to establish them as standard root canal irrigants against E. faecalis using agar well diffusion method.\n \n \n \n The collected data were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software.\n \n \n \n The present study found that green tea exhibited the most substantial antimicrobial activity among the tested herbal extracts, which was comparable to chlorhexidine. Although A. indica and C. longa required higher concentrations for effectiveness, their antimicrobial properties were also apparent.\n \n \n \n Within the constraints of this study, it can be concluded that green tea could be considered a promising alternative to chlorhexidine in treating endodontic infections due to its substantial antimicrobial activity against E. faecalis at lower concentrations.\n","PeriodicalId":516572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcde.jcde_349_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to evaluate the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of Herbal Irrigants. The aim of the study was to evaluate MIC and MBC of herbal extracts of Azadirachta indica, Curcuma longa, and Green Tea Against Enterococcus faecalis. The MIC and MBC of extracts of A . indica (neem), C. longa (turmeric), and Green Tea were evaluated to establish them as standard root canal irrigants against E. faecalis using agar well diffusion method. The collected data were statistically analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software. The present study found that green tea exhibited the most substantial antimicrobial activity among the tested herbal extracts, which was comparable to chlorhexidine. Although A. indica and C. longa required higher concentrations for effectiveness, their antimicrobial properties were also apparent. Within the constraints of this study, it can be concluded that green tea could be considered a promising alternative to chlorhexidine in treating endodontic infections due to its substantial antimicrobial activity against E. faecalis at lower concentrations.
各种草药冲洗剂对粪肠球菌最小抑菌浓度和最小杀菌浓度的比较评价
本文旨在评估草本刺激剂的最小抑菌浓度(MIC)和最小杀菌浓度(MBC)。 研究的目的是评估 Azadirachta indica、Curcuma longa 和绿茶草本提取物对粪肠球菌的 MIC 和 MBC。 研究采用琼脂井扩散法评估了楝树、姜黄和绿茶提取物的 MIC 和 MBC,以确定它们作为标准根管冲洗剂对粪肠球菌的作用。 收集到的数据使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行统计分析。 本研究发现,在测试的草药提取物中,绿茶的抗菌活性最强,与洗必泰相当。虽然 A. indica 和 C. longa 需要更高的浓度才能发挥功效,但它们的抗菌特性也很明显。 在本研究的限制条件下,可以得出这样的结论:绿茶在较低浓度下对粪大肠杆菌具有很强的抗菌活性,因此可以被认为是治疗牙髓感染的洗必泰的一种很有前途的替代品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信