{"title":"Institutional environments and conflict between foreign investors and local communities in large-scale agricultural land acquisitions","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ibusrev.2024.102319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores when conflict between foreign investors and local communities is likely to arise in large-scale agricultural land acquisitions (agricultural LSLAs) in developing countries. As prior studies emphasize stakeholder management of investors, we know relatively little about how the institutional environments surrounding LSLAs shape patterns of conflict. Combining insights from studies on informal community institutions, social movement, and comparative development, I develop arguments on how conflict is associated with liberal economic institutions and how this association is moderated by democratic institutions and inequality of both host and home countries. An analysis of 436 LSLAs between 2000 and 2019 based on Heckman’s sample selection models strongly supports the arguments. This study extends our understanding of conflict by incorporating interactions among multiple dimensions of institutions. It also contributes to the comparative development research by shedding light on the uniqueness of rural communities in developing countries compared with other non-elite actors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51352,"journal":{"name":"International Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593124000660/pdfft?md5=b29f90df3bcfbe8a081e8fbf6b5be4a7&pid=1-s2.0-S0969593124000660-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969593124000660","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study explores when conflict between foreign investors and local communities is likely to arise in large-scale agricultural land acquisitions (agricultural LSLAs) in developing countries. As prior studies emphasize stakeholder management of investors, we know relatively little about how the institutional environments surrounding LSLAs shape patterns of conflict. Combining insights from studies on informal community institutions, social movement, and comparative development, I develop arguments on how conflict is associated with liberal economic institutions and how this association is moderated by democratic institutions and inequality of both host and home countries. An analysis of 436 LSLAs between 2000 and 2019 based on Heckman’s sample selection models strongly supports the arguments. This study extends our understanding of conflict by incorporating interactions among multiple dimensions of institutions. It also contributes to the comparative development research by shedding light on the uniqueness of rural communities in developing countries compared with other non-elite actors.
期刊介绍:
The International Business Review (IBR) stands as a premier international journal within the realm of international business and proudly serves as the official publication of the European International Business Academy (EIBA). This esteemed journal publishes original and insightful papers addressing the theory and practice of international business, encompassing a broad spectrum of topics such as firms' internationalization strategies, cross-border management of operations, and comparative studies of business environments across different countries. In essence, IBR is dedicated to disseminating research that informs the international operations of firms, whether they are SMEs or large MNEs, and guides the actions of policymakers in both home and host countries. The journal warmly welcomes conceptual papers, empirical studies, and review articles, fostering contributions from various disciplines including strategy, finance, management, marketing, economics, HRM, and organizational studies. IBR embraces methodological diversity, with equal openness to papers utilizing quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-method approaches.