Developments and research directions for collision avoidance in mixed navigation environment for MASS: A systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis.

AIN Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.59660/48711
Mahmoud Basal, Alaa Ammar
{"title":"Developments and research directions for collision avoidance in mixed navigation environment for MASS: A systematic literature review with bibliometric analysis.","authors":"Mahmoud Basal, Alaa Ammar","doi":"10.59660/48711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT: The integration of advanced technologies, data-driven processes, and automation under the Industry 4.0 revolution is fostering increased connectivity among ships and maritime infrastructures, particularly with the emergence of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) and the imperative for safe navigation. Despite existing studies delving into collision regulations (COLREG), autonomous navigation, and risk assessment for MASS navigation, a comprehensive systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of academic research studies addressing collision avoidance in the context of MASS within mixed navigational environments has, to our knowledge, not been undertaken. This review aims to provide a concise overview of academic research advancements concerning the challenges associated with MASS and the safety of navigation in mixed navigational environments. To achieve this objective, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of pertinent studies, utilizing metrics and analysis tools to discern academic research topics, primary challenges, and directions in this domain. Our approach adhered to the principles outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) for systematic literature reviews, incorporating tailored keywords in a Scopus search. The results revealed that China, Norway, Poland, and South Korea are the leading countries in MASS collision avoidance, based on the weighted number of authors. Additionally, Ocean Engineering and the Journal of IFAC-Papers Online emerged as the principal journals for publications on this topic. Through the analyzed literature, specific challenges were identified, paving the way for suggested avenues for future research.","PeriodicalId":513697,"journal":{"name":"AIN Journal","volume":"8 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AIN Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59660/48711","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The integration of advanced technologies, data-driven processes, and automation under the Industry 4.0 revolution is fostering increased connectivity among ships and maritime infrastructures, particularly with the emergence of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) and the imperative for safe navigation. Despite existing studies delving into collision regulations (COLREG), autonomous navigation, and risk assessment for MASS navigation, a comprehensive systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis of academic research studies addressing collision avoidance in the context of MASS within mixed navigational environments has, to our knowledge, not been undertaken. This review aims to provide a concise overview of academic research advancements concerning the challenges associated with MASS and the safety of navigation in mixed navigational environments. To achieve this objective, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of pertinent studies, utilizing metrics and analysis tools to discern academic research topics, primary challenges, and directions in this domain. Our approach adhered to the principles outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) for systematic literature reviews, incorporating tailored keywords in a Scopus search. The results revealed that China, Norway, Poland, and South Korea are the leading countries in MASS collision avoidance, based on the weighted number of authors. Additionally, Ocean Engineering and the Journal of IFAC-Papers Online emerged as the principal journals for publications on this topic. Through the analyzed literature, specific challenges were identified, paving the way for suggested avenues for future research.
MASS 混合导航环境中避免碰撞的发展和研究方向:系统文献综述与文献计量分析。
摘要:在工业 4.0 革命中,先进技术、数据驱动流程和自动化的整合促进了船舶和海事基础设施之间的连接,特别是随着海上自主水面舰艇(MASS)的出现,安全航行势在必行。尽管现有研究深入探讨了碰撞法规(COLREG)、自主航行和 MASS 航行风险评估,但据我们所知,针对混合航行环境下 MASS 避免碰撞的学术研究还没有进行过全面系统的文献综述和文献计量分析。本综述旨在简明扼要地概述与混合导航环境中 MASS 相关的挑战和导航安全有关的学术研究进展。为了实现这一目标,我们对相关研究进行了文献计量分析,利用度量和分析工具来确定该领域的学术研究主题、主要挑战和方向。我们的方法遵循了《系统综述和元分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)中概述的系统文献综述原则,并在 Scopus 搜索中纳入了量身定制的关键词。结果显示,根据加权作者数量,中国、挪威、波兰和韩国在避免大规模杀伤性武器碰撞方面处于领先地位。此外,《海洋工程》和《IFAC-论文在线期刊》也成为该主题出版物的主要期刊。通过分析文献,确定了具体的挑战,为未来研究的建议途径铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信