Physiological, Perceptual, and Biomechanical Responses to Load Carriage while Walking at Military-Relevant Speeds and Loads—Are There Differences between Males and Females?

D. Vickery-Howe, B. Dascombe, J. Drain, A. Clarke, B. Hoolihan, Greg L. Carstairs, Anjana J. Reddy, K. Middleton
{"title":"Physiological, Perceptual, and Biomechanical Responses to Load Carriage while Walking at Military-Relevant Speeds and Loads—Are There Differences between Males and Females?","authors":"D. Vickery-Howe, B. Dascombe, J. Drain, A. Clarke, B. Hoolihan, Greg L. Carstairs, Anjana J. Reddy, K. Middleton","doi":"10.3390/biomechanics4030027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to investigate the physiological, perceptual, and biomechanical differences between male and female soldiers across several military-relevant load and walking speed combinations. Eleven female and twelve male soldiers completed twelve 12 min walking trials at varying speeds (3.5 km·h−1, 5.5 km·h−1, 6.5 km·h−1) and with varying external loads (7.2 kg, 23.2 kg, 35.2 kg). Physiological (indirect calorimetry, heart rate), perceptual (perceived exertion), and biomechanical (spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic) outcomes were measured throughout each trial. Females had a lower aerobic capacity and lower body strength than males, which resulted in them working at a greater exercise intensity (%VO2peak and heart rate) but with a lower oxygen pulse. Females demonstrated higher breathing frequency and perceived exertion with specific loads. At selected loads and speeds, frontal and sagittal pelvis, hip, and knee motions and forces were greater for females. Females consistently displayed greater relative stride length and step width. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance of tailored interventions, periodisation, and nutritional strategies for female military personnel, given their higher relative work rate and increased injury risk during load carriage tasks. Understanding these differences is crucial for preparing female soldiers for the physical demands of military service.","PeriodicalId":513714,"journal":{"name":"Biomechanics","volume":"59 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics4030027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate the physiological, perceptual, and biomechanical differences between male and female soldiers across several military-relevant load and walking speed combinations. Eleven female and twelve male soldiers completed twelve 12 min walking trials at varying speeds (3.5 km·h−1, 5.5 km·h−1, 6.5 km·h−1) and with varying external loads (7.2 kg, 23.2 kg, 35.2 kg). Physiological (indirect calorimetry, heart rate), perceptual (perceived exertion), and biomechanical (spatiotemporal, kinematic, kinetic) outcomes were measured throughout each trial. Females had a lower aerobic capacity and lower body strength than males, which resulted in them working at a greater exercise intensity (%VO2peak and heart rate) but with a lower oxygen pulse. Females demonstrated higher breathing frequency and perceived exertion with specific loads. At selected loads and speeds, frontal and sagittal pelvis, hip, and knee motions and forces were greater for females. Females consistently displayed greater relative stride length and step width. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the importance of tailored interventions, periodisation, and nutritional strategies for female military personnel, given their higher relative work rate and increased injury risk during load carriage tasks. Understanding these differences is crucial for preparing female soldiers for the physical demands of military service.
以军事相关速度和负载行走时对负载承载的生理、感知和生物力学反应--男性和女性之间存在差异吗?
本研究旨在调查男女士兵在几种与军事相关的负荷和步行速度组合下的生理、知觉和生物力学差异。11 名女兵和 12 名男兵以不同的速度(3.5 km-h-1、5.5 km-h-1、6.5 km-h-1)和不同的外部负荷(7.2 kg、23.2 kg、35.2 kg)完成了 12 次 12 分钟的步行试验。在每次试验的整个过程中都对生理(间接热量计、心率)、知觉(感觉用力)和生物力学(时空、运动学、动力学)结果进行了测量。与男性相比,女性的有氧能力较低,身体力量较弱,这导致她们的运动强度(峰值氧饱和度百分比和心率)较大,但氧脉较低。在特定负荷下,女性表现出更高的呼吸频率和体力消耗感知。在选定的负荷和速度下,女性的骨盆、髋关节和膝关节的正面和矢状运动及力量更大。女性始终表现出更大的相对步长和步幅。总之,这项研究表明,鉴于女性军事人员的相对工作率更高,在负重运输任务中受伤的风险也更大,因此为她们量身定制干预措施、周期安排和营养策略非常重要。了解这些差异对于帮助女兵适应服役期间的体能要求至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信