Applying the blended KTA-Sprint framework to a usability assessment of a digital health module for informal caregivers co-managing heart failure

IF 1.6
Human factors in healthcare Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.hfh.2024.100081
Ting Xiong , Camila Benmessaoud , Kaylen J. Pfisterer , Noor El-Dassouki , Raima Lohani , Karen Young , Quynh Pham
{"title":"Applying the blended KTA-Sprint framework to a usability assessment of a digital health module for informal caregivers co-managing heart failure","authors":"Ting Xiong ,&nbsp;Camila Benmessaoud ,&nbsp;Kaylen J. Pfisterer ,&nbsp;Noor El-Dassouki ,&nbsp;Raima Lohani ,&nbsp;Karen Young ,&nbsp;Quynh Pham","doi":"10.1016/j.hfh.2024.100081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aims</h3><p>The main purpose of this study was to design and evaluate core features of a patient-informal caregiver shared digital health module, Caretown, to support chronic disease management. The secondary purpose was to explore the efficacy of ongoing implementation of an innovative KTA-Sprint framework through usability testing of the Caretown module.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Guided by the KTA-Sprint framework, seven core features of the Caretown module were designed through a multi-method approach: symptom live reports, care cards, trends, medication wallet, medical events timeline, messenger, and caregiver resources.</p></div><div><h3>Results and discussion</h3><p>We tested the prototype of the module with seven informal caregivers. Findings from quantitative usability metrics and qualitative interviews were translated into required refinements (e.g., how to improve intuitiveness of icons, interpretation of presented data, and system navigation) and mapped onto a subset of Ravden checklist domains. Qualitative usability feedback highlighted opportunities to further improve: visual clarity, consistency, compatibility with user expectations, how to provide informative feedback with clear structure, functionality, flexibility and control. Throughout the design process, we identified considerations for supporting future implementation outcomes including equity, acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and fidelity. Moreover, the KTA-Sprint framework effectively guided the design and evaluation process for the Caretown module.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This development and usability testing of the Caretown module illustrates the implementation of the rapid and iterative KTA-Sprint framework. Scenario-based testing and multi-method analyses of user feedback allowed for triangulation of feedback. Results informed key considerations for product deployment and future implementation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93564,"journal":{"name":"Human factors in healthcare","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100081"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772501424000186/pdfft?md5=5765da7b4a1b16df398476fea26f0c73&pid=1-s2.0-S2772501424000186-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human factors in healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772501424000186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims

The main purpose of this study was to design and evaluate core features of a patient-informal caregiver shared digital health module, Caretown, to support chronic disease management. The secondary purpose was to explore the efficacy of ongoing implementation of an innovative KTA-Sprint framework through usability testing of the Caretown module.

Methods

Guided by the KTA-Sprint framework, seven core features of the Caretown module were designed through a multi-method approach: symptom live reports, care cards, trends, medication wallet, medical events timeline, messenger, and caregiver resources.

Results and discussion

We tested the prototype of the module with seven informal caregivers. Findings from quantitative usability metrics and qualitative interviews were translated into required refinements (e.g., how to improve intuitiveness of icons, interpretation of presented data, and system navigation) and mapped onto a subset of Ravden checklist domains. Qualitative usability feedback highlighted opportunities to further improve: visual clarity, consistency, compatibility with user expectations, how to provide informative feedback with clear structure, functionality, flexibility and control. Throughout the design process, we identified considerations for supporting future implementation outcomes including equity, acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, and fidelity. Moreover, the KTA-Sprint framework effectively guided the design and evaluation process for the Caretown module.

Conclusions

This development and usability testing of the Caretown module illustrates the implementation of the rapid and iterative KTA-Sprint framework. Scenario-based testing and multi-method analyses of user feedback allowed for triangulation of feedback. Results informed key considerations for product deployment and future implementation.

将 KTA-Sprint 混合框架应用于针对共同管理心力衰竭的非正式护理人员的数字健康模块可用性评估
目的本研究的主要目的是设计和评估患者与护理人员共享的数字健康模块 Caretown 的核心功能,以支持慢性病管理。方法在 KTA-Sprint 框架的指导下,通过多种方法设计了 Caretown 模块的七个核心功能:症状实时报告、护理卡、趋势、药物钱包、医疗事件时间轴、信使和护理人员资源。结果与讨论我们与七位非正式护理人员一起测试了模块原型。从定量可用性指标和定性访谈中得出的结果被转化为所需的改进(例如,如何提高图标的直观性、对所显示数据的解释以及系统导航),并被映射到拉弗登检查表的子集域中。定性可用性反馈强调了进一步改进的机会:视觉清晰度、一致性、与用户期望的兼容性、如何以清晰的结构提供信息反馈、功能、灵活性和控制。在整个设计过程中,我们确定了支持未来实施结果的考虑因素,包括公平性、可接受性、采用性、适当性和忠实性。此外,KTA-Sprint 框架还有效地指导了 Caretown 模块的设计和评估过程。基于场景的测试和对用户反馈的多种方法分析使得对反馈进行三角测量成为可能。测试结果为产品部署和未来实施提供了重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human factors in healthcare
Human factors in healthcare Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
145 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书