Hesiodic Justice and the Canonicity of the Catalogue of Women

IF 0.7 2区历史学 N/A CLASSICS

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1086/730586

Connor Purcell Wood

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evidence is sparse for the grounds on which ancient audiences and critics decided that certain poems were Homeric or Hesiodic. As the original Hesiodic canon was large and disparate, thematic preoccupations and narrative arc provide a better basis for canonization than purely “literary” style. Hesiodic poetry portrays a myth-history organized by Zeus’ sovereignty and justice in a markedly different way from Homeric poetry. Comparative evidence is adduced from the Catalogue of Women and the Shield of Heracles to explain why ancient readers nearly universally considered Hesiod to be their author.

查看原文本刊更多论文

赫西俄德正义与《妇女目录》的经典性

古代读者和评论家根据什么来判定某些诗歌是荷马史诗还是赫西俄德诗，这方面的证据很少。由于最初的赫西俄德诗集规模庞大，内容分散，因此，与纯粹的 "文学 "风格相比，主题先行和叙事弧线更能为诗集的确定提供依据。赫西俄德诗歌描绘的神话历史是由宙斯的主权和正义组织起来的，与荷马史诗明显不同。我们从《妇女目录》和《赫拉克勒斯之盾》中找到了比较证据，以解释为什么古代读者几乎普遍认为赫西俄德是他们的作者。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格