The Effect of Accuracy of All on 4 Mandibular Implant Hybrid Prosthesis Fabricated by Two Different Impression Techniques (Digital versus Conventional) on Bone Loss.

Amr Salah el-din Gomaa, Amr abd el bary emara, Elsayed H. Ali, Omayma Mohamad
{"title":"The Effect of Accuracy of All on 4 Mandibular Implant Hybrid Prosthesis Fabricated by Two Different Impression Techniques (Digital versus Conventional) on Bone Loss.","authors":"Amr Salah el-din Gomaa, Amr abd el bary emara, Elsayed H. Ali, Omayma Mohamad","doi":"10.21608/edj.2024.273507.2962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Comparing the accuracy of all on four implants supported hybrid prosthesis which gained from two different impression techniques (digital versus conventional) in order to show its effect on marginal bone loss. Materials and Methods: 16 completely edentulous patients with age range above 60 years were participated in this study received new upper and lower dentures. Placement of four implants in the inter-foraminal area of the mandible were done according to the concept of “All on four implants” followed by immediate loading with the lower denture. Three months later, the patients were divided in a random manner into two equal groups: Group I: performed a digital intraoral scanning for lower arch, Group II: performed an open tray abutment level impression technique for lower arch then a hyprid prosthesis were fabricated and measure the level of bone loss in 0,3,6,12 months radiographicaly. Results: The results of this study showed statistically insignificant less bone height changes in Group I in comparison to Group II according to the radiographic outcomes. Conclusion: All on 4 mandibular implant hybrid prosthesis fabricated from digital impression prove to be more precise and more reliable than that fabricated from conventional impression and regarding bone height changes the group of digital impression showed less marginal bone loss that enhance prognosis of dental prosthesis and implant survival rate.","PeriodicalId":11504,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian dental journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/edj.2024.273507.2962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Comparing the accuracy of all on four implants supported hybrid prosthesis which gained from two different impression techniques (digital versus conventional) in order to show its effect on marginal bone loss. Materials and Methods: 16 completely edentulous patients with age range above 60 years were participated in this study received new upper and lower dentures. Placement of four implants in the inter-foraminal area of the mandible were done according to the concept of “All on four implants” followed by immediate loading with the lower denture. Three months later, the patients were divided in a random manner into two equal groups: Group I: performed a digital intraoral scanning for lower arch, Group II: performed an open tray abutment level impression technique for lower arch then a hyprid prosthesis were fabricated and measure the level of bone loss in 0,3,6,12 months radiographicaly. Results: The results of this study showed statistically insignificant less bone height changes in Group I in comparison to Group II according to the radiographic outcomes. Conclusion: All on 4 mandibular implant hybrid prosthesis fabricated from digital impression prove to be more precise and more reliable than that fabricated from conventional impression and regarding bone height changes the group of digital impression showed less marginal bone loss that enhance prognosis of dental prosthesis and implant survival rate.
采用两种不同印模技术(数字与传统)制作的 4 个下颌种植体混合假体的精度对骨质流失的影响。
目的:比较通过两种不同印模技术(数字印模技术和传统印模技术)获得的四种种植体支持混合义齿的准确性,以显示其对边缘骨质流失的影响。材料与方法:16 名年龄在 60 岁以上的全口无牙患者参与了这项研究,他们都接受了新的上下义齿。根据 "四颗种植体全部植入 "的概念,在下颌颊间区植入四颗种植体,然后立即戴上下义齿。三个月后,患者被随机分为两组:第一组:对下牙弓进行数字化口内扫描;第二组:对下牙弓进行开放式托盘基台水平印模技术,然后制作透明义齿,并在 0、3、6、12 个月后通过影像学测量骨质流失水平。结果:研究结果表明,从放射学结果来看,第一组与第二组相比,骨高度的变化在统计学上并不明显。结论根据数字印模制作的下颌种植混合修复体比根据传统印模制作的修复体更精确、更可靠,在骨高度变化方面,数字印模组显示出较少的边缘骨损失,从而提高了修复体的预后和种植体的存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信