Comparison between Palonosetron and Ondansetron in Prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Nausea Vomiting

Tanni TA
{"title":"Comparison between Palonosetron and Ondansetron in Prevention of Chemotherapy Induced Nausea Vomiting","authors":"Tanni TA","doi":"10.47648/jswmc2024v14-02-108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is the commonest and the most incapacitating experience of thepatient undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Poorly controlled CINV sometimes make patients to refuse further treatment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Palonosetron and Ondansetron in preventing CINV during cancer chemotherapy.\n\nMethods:This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College from January 2021 to December 2021. There were 190patients enrolled initially; 14 patients from both groups withdraw themselves. Finally, 91 patients of Palonosetron and 85 patients of Ondansetron treated were recruited. The Palonosetron group were treated with Palonosetron at 0.25 mg and the Ondansetron group were treated with Ondansetron 8.0 mg intravenously, 30min before chemotherapy. After that Palonosetron 0.5 mg single time and Ondansetron 8.0 mg orally three times a day were given and total follow-up period was seven days. Episode of nausea and vomiting graded according to the guideline “Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)”, version 4.0, which was published by the US Department of Health and Human Services (National Institute of Health and National Cancer Institute).\n\nResult: The groups were matched for the age (p = 0.263), gender (p = 0.630), body weight (p = 0.846),site of malignancy (p = 0.375), and drugsused for chemotherapeutic (p = 0.301) in both study groups. Palonosetron treated patients experienced significant lower episode of nausea in day-1 (p = <0.001) and day-2 (p = 0.025), and in case vomiting in day-1 (p = 0.026) compared to Ondansetron. Significantly higher number of patients of Palonosetron compared to Ondansetron treated group showed complete response in both acute phase (p = 0.026), delayed phase (p = 0.036) and finally in overall phase (p = 0.014). Only four patients experienced with treatment failure in Ondansetron treated group. Observed adverse effects were in low intensity and not caused to stop the treatment procedure.\n\nConclusion: Palonosetron was found to be more efficacious and well tolerated in preventing acute, delayed and overall phase of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in this study.","PeriodicalId":407803,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","volume":"17 16","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Sylhet Women’s Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47648/jswmc2024v14-02-108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is the commonest and the most incapacitating experience of thepatient undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Poorly controlled CINV sometimes make patients to refuse further treatment. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of Palonosetron and Ondansetron in preventing CINV during cancer chemotherapy. Methods:This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics of Sylhet MAG Osmani Medical College from January 2021 to December 2021. There were 190patients enrolled initially; 14 patients from both groups withdraw themselves. Finally, 91 patients of Palonosetron and 85 patients of Ondansetron treated were recruited. The Palonosetron group were treated with Palonosetron at 0.25 mg and the Ondansetron group were treated with Ondansetron 8.0 mg intravenously, 30min before chemotherapy. After that Palonosetron 0.5 mg single time and Ondansetron 8.0 mg orally three times a day were given and total follow-up period was seven days. Episode of nausea and vomiting graded according to the guideline “Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)”, version 4.0, which was published by the US Department of Health and Human Services (National Institute of Health and National Cancer Institute). Result: The groups were matched for the age (p = 0.263), gender (p = 0.630), body weight (p = 0.846),site of malignancy (p = 0.375), and drugsused for chemotherapeutic (p = 0.301) in both study groups. Palonosetron treated patients experienced significant lower episode of nausea in day-1 (p = <0.001) and day-2 (p = 0.025), and in case vomiting in day-1 (p = 0.026) compared to Ondansetron. Significantly higher number of patients of Palonosetron compared to Ondansetron treated group showed complete response in both acute phase (p = 0.026), delayed phase (p = 0.036) and finally in overall phase (p = 0.014). Only four patients experienced with treatment failure in Ondansetron treated group. Observed adverse effects were in low intensity and not caused to stop the treatment procedure. Conclusion: Palonosetron was found to be more efficacious and well tolerated in preventing acute, delayed and overall phase of chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting in this study.
帕洛诺司琼与昂丹司琼在预防化疗引起的恶心呕吐方面的比较
背景:化疗引起的恶心和呕吐(CINV)是接受癌症化疗的患者最常见也是最令人丧失能力的经历。CINV控制不佳有时会使患者拒绝进一步治疗。本研究旨在比较帕洛诺司琼(Palonosetron)和昂丹司琼(Ondansetron)在癌症化疗期间预防 CINV 的有效性和安全性。方法:本随机对照试验于 2021 年 1 月至 2021 年 12 月在 Sylhet MAG Osmani 医学院药理学和治疗学系进行。最初有 190 名患者报名参加,两组中均有 14 名患者退出。最后,共招募了 91 名接受帕洛诺司琼治疗的患者和 85 名接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者。帕洛诺司琼治疗组在化疗前 30 分钟静脉注射 0.25 毫克帕洛诺司琼,昂丹司琼治疗组在化疗前 30 分钟静脉注射 8.0 毫克昂丹司琼。之后,单次给予帕洛诺司琼 0.5 毫克,一天三次口服昂丹司琼 8.0 毫克,总随访期为七天。根据美国卫生与公众服务部(国家卫生研究院和国家癌症研究所)发布的《不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)》(4.0 版)对恶心和呕吐发作进行分级:结果:两组患者的年龄(P = 0.263)、性别(P = 0.630)、体重(P = 0.846)、恶性肿瘤部位(P = 0.375)和化疗药物(P = 0.301)均匹配。与昂丹司琼相比,接受帕洛诺司琼治疗的患者在第1天(p = <0.001)和第2天(p = 0.025)出现恶心的次数明显减少,在第1天出现呕吐的情况下(p = 0.026)也明显减少。与昂丹司琼治疗组相比,帕洛诺司琼治疗组在急性期(p = 0.026)、延迟期(p = 0.036)和总体期(p = 0.014)出现完全应答的患者人数显著增多。昂丹司琼治疗组仅有四名患者出现治疗失败。观察到的不良反应强度较低,不会导致治疗过程的停止:结论:本研究发现,帕洛诺司琼在预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的急性期、延迟期和整个阶段的疗效更好,耐受性更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信