Role of score-deviation, hedonic and fuzzy logic sensory approaches for the development and identification of optimal vegetable mix soups

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Kumudhini Akasapu , Ramagopal V.S. Uppaluri
{"title":"Role of score-deviation, hedonic and fuzzy logic sensory approaches for the development and identification of optimal vegetable mix soups","authors":"Kumudhini Akasapu ,&nbsp;Ramagopal V.S. Uppaluri","doi":"10.1016/j.ijgfs.2024.100982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article aims to mature understanding in the confidence levels ascertained in alternate sensory evaluation techniques (9-point hedonic scale, fuzzy logic and novel score-deviation sensory evaluation techniques) and for the identification of optimal soup mix formulations. Seven alternate formulations with varied proportions of vegetable mix, corn flour and spice mix were evaluated for various sensory parameters. The findings of all three sensory evaluation techniques affirmed that the formulation (WE2) with 50% vegetable mix, 20% corn flour, 30% spice mix and reconstitution ratio of 1:22 (dry mix: water) has been the best. The score-deviation method based highest score (81.35) and lowest deviation-index (17.79) being achieved for the WE2 formulation affirmed greater acceptability of the WE2 sample and better uniformity among the sensory parameters. The score-deviation method also revealed that the taste-index exhibited its maximum weightage (46.67) to the overall score. This is followed by the aroma-index and physical-index. Further, fuzzy logic analysis method affirmed that the aftertaste is a highly important sensory parameter. This is due to its sensitive influence upon the overall acceptance in terms of similarity index value but not weightage of the assessed samples. Further, 9-point hedonic scale method affirmed highest overall acceptability (8.1) of WE2 formulation. However, such an affirmation has not been conclusive to the weightage or preference of individual sensory parameters. In summary, the score-deviation method and fuzzy logic analysis method provided better inferences in assessing the significance of various sensory parameters and their sensitive influence upon the overall acceptance of the samples. Among these two methods, the score-deviation method out performed and demonstrated an added advantage in terms of the uniformity of the assessed scores of various individual sensory parameters and overall acceptability score parameter.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48594,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science","volume":"37 ","pages":"Article 100982"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878450X2400115X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article aims to mature understanding in the confidence levels ascertained in alternate sensory evaluation techniques (9-point hedonic scale, fuzzy logic and novel score-deviation sensory evaluation techniques) and for the identification of optimal soup mix formulations. Seven alternate formulations with varied proportions of vegetable mix, corn flour and spice mix were evaluated for various sensory parameters. The findings of all three sensory evaluation techniques affirmed that the formulation (WE2) with 50% vegetable mix, 20% corn flour, 30% spice mix and reconstitution ratio of 1:22 (dry mix: water) has been the best. The score-deviation method based highest score (81.35) and lowest deviation-index (17.79) being achieved for the WE2 formulation affirmed greater acceptability of the WE2 sample and better uniformity among the sensory parameters. The score-deviation method also revealed that the taste-index exhibited its maximum weightage (46.67) to the overall score. This is followed by the aroma-index and physical-index. Further, fuzzy logic analysis method affirmed that the aftertaste is a highly important sensory parameter. This is due to its sensitive influence upon the overall acceptance in terms of similarity index value but not weightage of the assessed samples. Further, 9-point hedonic scale method affirmed highest overall acceptability (8.1) of WE2 formulation. However, such an affirmation has not been conclusive to the weightage or preference of individual sensory parameters. In summary, the score-deviation method and fuzzy logic analysis method provided better inferences in assessing the significance of various sensory parameters and their sensitive influence upon the overall acceptance of the samples. Among these two methods, the score-deviation method out performed and demonstrated an added advantage in terms of the uniformity of the assessed scores of various individual sensory parameters and overall acceptability score parameter.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

分数差异、享乐主义和模糊逻辑感官方法在开发和确定最佳蔬菜混合汤中的作用
这篇文章旨在使人们对其他感官评价技术(9 点享乐主义量表、模糊逻辑和新型分数差异感官评价技术)所确定的置信度有更深入的了解,并确定最佳汤料配方。对蔬菜混合料、玉米粉和香料混合料比例不同的七种交替配方进行了各种感官参数的评估。所有三种感官评价技术的结果都证实,蔬菜混合料占 50%、玉米粉占 20%、香料混合料占 30%、混合比例为 1:22(干混合料:水)的配方(WE2)最佳。基于得分-偏差法的最高得分(81.35)和最低偏差指数(17.79)表明,WE2 配方的样品可接受性更高,感官参数的一致性更好。得分-偏差法还显示,口味指数在总分中所占权重最大(46.67)。其次是香气指数和物理指数。此外,模糊逻辑分析法证实,余味是一个非常重要的感官参数。这是因为从相似性指数值来看,余味对总体接受度的影响非常敏感,但对所评估样品的权重影响不大。此外,9 点享乐量表法确认了 WE2 配方的最高总体可接受性(8.1)。然而,这种肯定并不能确定单个感官参数的权重或偏好。总之,得分偏差法和模糊逻辑分析法在评估各种感官参数的重要性及其对样品总体接受度的敏感影响方面提供了更好的推论。在这两种方法中,分值偏差法在各种感官参数和总体可接受性分值参数的评估分值的一致性方面表现出色,并显示出更大的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science
International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
170
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: International Journal of Gastronomy and Food Science is a peer-reviewed journal that explicitly focuses on the interface of food science and gastronomy. Articles focusing only on food science will not be considered. This journal equally encourages both scientists and chefs to publish original scientific papers, review articles and original culinary works. We seek articles with clear evidence of this interaction. From a scientific perspective, this publication aims to become the home for research from the whole community of food science and gastronomy. IJGFS explores all aspects related to the growing field of the interaction of gastronomy and food science, in areas such as food chemistry, food technology and culinary techniques, food microbiology, genetics, sensory science, neuroscience, psychology, culinary concepts, culinary trends, and gastronomic experience (all the elements that contribute to the appreciation and enjoyment of the meal. Also relevant is research on science-based educational programs in gastronomy, anthropology, gastronomic history and food sociology. All these areas of knowledge are crucial to gastronomy, as they contribute to a better understanding of this broad term and its practical implications for science and society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信