Evaluation of Abdominal Muscle Thickness Changes During Abdominal Hollowing Maneuver in Different Positions Using a Sphygmomanometer for People With Chronic Low Back Pain

Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush PT PhD , Rasool Bagheri PT, PhD , Mona Ramezani PT MSc , Mahdieh Ghasemian PT MSc , Mehrnaz Inanloo PT BSc , Seyed Abolfazl Tohidast PhD , Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi PT PhD , Mahmoud Akbari PT PhD
{"title":"Evaluation of Abdominal Muscle Thickness Changes During Abdominal Hollowing Maneuver in Different Positions Using a Sphygmomanometer for People With Chronic Low Back Pain","authors":"Cyrus Taghizadeh Delkhoush PT PhD ,&nbsp;Rasool Bagheri PT, PhD ,&nbsp;Mona Ramezani PT MSc ,&nbsp;Mahdieh Ghasemian PT MSc ,&nbsp;Mehrnaz Inanloo PT BSc ,&nbsp;Seyed Abolfazl Tohidast PhD ,&nbsp;Mohammad Reza Pourahmadi PT PhD ,&nbsp;Mahmoud Akbari PT PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jcm.2024.05.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>The aim of this present investigation was to compare changes in transverse abdominis (TrA) thickness in a functional position with those in a less functional but more supportive posture and to determine which posture showed greater changes in TrA thickness between rest and during abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) relative to external oblique (EO) and internal oblique (IO) muscles.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>Thirty adult participants with chronic low back pain were included in this observational study. The abdominal muscle thickness was measured in the supine, crook lying, prone, quadruped, sitting, side bridge, and standing poitions on a tilt board using </span>ultrasonography<span><span><span>. The mean of abdominal muscle thickness changes was measured during ADIM, and a sphygmomanometer was used in the </span>supine position<span> under the lumbar spine and in the </span></span>prone position<span> under the abdominal wall. Transverse abdominis, EO, and IO muscle thickness changes during all tasks were normalized according to the supine rest position.</span></span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Transverse abdominis muscle thickness changes were increased in the quadruped and sitting positions compared with other positions (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Results demonstrated increased EO muscle thickness changes in the prone position compared with other positions (<em>P</em> &lt; .05). Internal oblique muscle thickness changes were not significant during different positions (<em>P</em> &gt; .05). However, the IO muscle thickness was higher in all positions compared with TrA and EO muscle.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our study revealed that participants with chronic low back pain exhibited increased TrA muscle activity in the sitting position on a gym ball and in the quadruped position compared with during leg tasks. However, the EO muscle thickness changes were increased during an ADIM with a sphygmomanometer under the abdomen.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":94328,"journal":{"name":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","volume":"23 3","pages":"Pages 102-113"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of chiropractic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1556370724000099","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this present investigation was to compare changes in transverse abdominis (TrA) thickness in a functional position with those in a less functional but more supportive posture and to determine which posture showed greater changes in TrA thickness between rest and during abdominal drawing-in maneuver (ADIM) relative to external oblique (EO) and internal oblique (IO) muscles.

Methods

Thirty adult participants with chronic low back pain were included in this observational study. The abdominal muscle thickness was measured in the supine, crook lying, prone, quadruped, sitting, side bridge, and standing poitions on a tilt board using ultrasonography. The mean of abdominal muscle thickness changes was measured during ADIM, and a sphygmomanometer was used in the supine position under the lumbar spine and in the prone position under the abdominal wall. Transverse abdominis, EO, and IO muscle thickness changes during all tasks were normalized according to the supine rest position.

Results

Transverse abdominis muscle thickness changes were increased in the quadruped and sitting positions compared with other positions (P < .05). Results demonstrated increased EO muscle thickness changes in the prone position compared with other positions (P < .05). Internal oblique muscle thickness changes were not significant during different positions (P > .05). However, the IO muscle thickness was higher in all positions compared with TrA and EO muscle.

Conclusion

Our study revealed that participants with chronic low back pain exhibited increased TrA muscle activity in the sitting position on a gym ball and in the quadruped position compared with during leg tasks. However, the EO muscle thickness changes were increased during an ADIM with a sphygmomanometer under the abdomen.
使用血压计评估慢性腰痛患者在不同姿势下做腹部掏空动作时腹肌厚度的变化
本研究旨在比较功能性体位与功能性较弱但支撑性较强的体位下腹横肌(TrA)厚度的变化,并确定相对于腹外斜肌(EO)和腹内斜肌(IO)而言,哪种体位下腹横肌厚度在静息状态和腹部拉伸动作(ADIM)期间变化更大。在仰卧、弯腰、俯卧、四足、坐位、侧桥和站立姿势下,在倾斜板上使用超声波测量腹部肌肉厚度。在 ADIM 期间测量腹部肌肉厚度变化的平均值,并在仰卧位腰椎下和俯卧位腹壁下使用血压计进行测量。所有任务中腹横肌、EO 和 IO 肌肉厚度的变化都根据仰卧休息姿势进行了归一化处理。结果表明,与其他体位相比,俯卧位的腹横肌厚度变化增加(P <.05)。在不同体位下,内斜肌厚度变化不明显(P > .05)。结论:我们的研究表明,慢性腰痛患者在健身球上的坐姿和四足姿势下的 TrA 肌肉活动与腿部运动时相比有所增加。然而,在腹部下使用血压计进行 ADIM 时,EO 肌肉厚度的变化有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信