The postulated role of brain pulsations and arachnoid membranes in cerebrospinal fluid circulation, ventriculomegaly and related CSF disorders

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Muhammad Hasan Raza
{"title":"The postulated role of brain pulsations and arachnoid membranes in cerebrospinal fluid circulation, ventriculomegaly and related CSF disorders","authors":"Muhammad Hasan Raza","doi":"10.1016/j.mehy.2024.111424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>Hydrocephalus can be obstructive or communicating. In cases of communicating hydrocephalus, patients will typically have enlarged brain ventricles. It has long been thought that the reason for this is obstruction to the outflow of cerebrospinal fluid from the </span>subarachnoid space, which also results in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). However, there are several clinical and anatomic observations that are not well explained by this idea. These are for example, the conditions of Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) which has normal ICP but ventriculomegaly, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) which has raised ICP but normal sized ventricles. This hypothesis states that the mechanism for raised ICP and large ventricles seen in communicating hydrocephalus (ventriculomegaly) are different and seeks to explain the cause of ventriculomegaly using illustrative examples. It also suggests explanations for why ventriculomegaly occurs in NPH, infectious or carcinomatous meningitis, but is absent in IIH, or dural venous sinus thrombosis. Based on operative neurosurgical observations it states that the arachnoid membranes in the basal cisterns serve as part of a directional CSF flow mechanism consisting of fluid diodes, or “Tesla valves” of arachnoid membrane, containing CSF that is propelled by brain pulsations from the point of exit from the 4th ventricle to its points of absorption. This hypothesis suggests explanations for the physiologic appearance of a near uniform subarachnoid space, as well as the occurrence of the syndrome of the trephined and external hydrocephalus seen following a decompressive craniectomy. Also suggested are avenues of further research testing with MRI phase contrast CSF flow studies, classification of anatomic and </span><em>peri</em>-operative observations and rationale for creation of novel experiments to test the hypothesis, and aid diagnosis and treatment of a number of cranial CSF disorders.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18425,"journal":{"name":"Medical hypotheses","volume":"190 ","pages":"Article 111424"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical hypotheses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306987724001671","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hydrocephalus can be obstructive or communicating. In cases of communicating hydrocephalus, patients will typically have enlarged brain ventricles. It has long been thought that the reason for this is obstruction to the outflow of cerebrospinal fluid from the subarachnoid space, which also results in raised intracranial pressure (ICP). However, there are several clinical and anatomic observations that are not well explained by this idea. These are for example, the conditions of Normal pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) which has normal ICP but ventriculomegaly, and idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) which has raised ICP but normal sized ventricles. This hypothesis states that the mechanism for raised ICP and large ventricles seen in communicating hydrocephalus (ventriculomegaly) are different and seeks to explain the cause of ventriculomegaly using illustrative examples. It also suggests explanations for why ventriculomegaly occurs in NPH, infectious or carcinomatous meningitis, but is absent in IIH, or dural venous sinus thrombosis. Based on operative neurosurgical observations it states that the arachnoid membranes in the basal cisterns serve as part of a directional CSF flow mechanism consisting of fluid diodes, or “Tesla valves” of arachnoid membrane, containing CSF that is propelled by brain pulsations from the point of exit from the 4th ventricle to its points of absorption. This hypothesis suggests explanations for the physiologic appearance of a near uniform subarachnoid space, as well as the occurrence of the syndrome of the trephined and external hydrocephalus seen following a decompressive craniectomy. Also suggested are avenues of further research testing with MRI phase contrast CSF flow studies, classification of anatomic and peri-operative observations and rationale for creation of novel experiments to test the hypothesis, and aid diagnosis and treatment of a number of cranial CSF disorders.

脑搏动和蛛网膜在脑脊液循环、脑室肥大及相关脑脊液疾病中的假设作用
脑积水可以是阻塞性的,也可以是交流性的。在交流性脑积水的病例中,患者的脑室通常会扩大。长期以来,人们一直认为其原因是蛛网膜下腔脑脊液流出受阻,从而导致颅内压(ICP)升高。然而,有一些临床和解剖观察结果并不能很好地解释这一观点。例如,正常压力脑积水(NPH)的ICP正常但脑室肥大,特发性颅内高压(IIH)的ICP升高但脑室大小正常。该假说认为,交流性脑积水(脑室肥大)中出现的ICP升高和脑室变大的机制不同,并试图用实例解释脑室肥大的原因。它还提出了为什么 NPH、感染性或癌性脑膜炎会出现脑室肥大,而 IIH 或硬脑膜静脉窦血栓形成却不会出现脑室肥大的解释。根据神经外科手术观察,该假说认为基底腔的蛛网膜是 CSF 定向流动机制的一部分,该机制由流体二极管或蛛网膜 "特斯拉阀 "组成,内含 CSF,CSF 在脑搏动的推动下从第四脑室的出口点流向吸收点。这一假说解释了蛛网膜下腔近乎均匀的生理学外观,也解释了减压开颅手术后出现的颅内和颅外脑积水综合征。此外,还提出了通过磁共振成像相衬脑脊液流研究进行进一步研究测试的途径、解剖学和围手术期观察的分类,以及创建新实验以测试该假说的理由,并帮助诊断和治疗一些颅脑脑脊液疾病。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical hypotheses
Medical hypotheses 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.10%
发文量
167
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Medical Hypotheses is a forum for ideas in medicine and related biomedical sciences. It will publish interesting and important theoretical papers that foster the diversity and debate upon which the scientific process thrives. The Aims and Scope of Medical Hypotheses are no different now from what was proposed by the founder of the journal, the late Dr David Horrobin. In his introduction to the first issue of the Journal, he asks ''what sorts of papers will be published in Medical Hypotheses? and goes on to answer ''Medical Hypotheses will publish papers which describe theories, ideas which have a great deal of observational support and some hypotheses where experimental support is yet fragmentary''. (Horrobin DF, 1975 Ideas in Biomedical Science: Reasons for the foundation of Medical Hypotheses. Medical Hypotheses Volume 1, Issue 1, January-February 1975, Pages 1-2.). Medical Hypotheses was therefore launched, and still exists today, to give novel, radical new ideas and speculations in medicine open-minded consideration, opening the field to radical hypotheses which would be rejected by most conventional journals. Papers in Medical Hypotheses take a standard scientific form in terms of style, structure and referencing. The journal therefore constitutes a bridge between cutting-edge theory and the mainstream of medical and scientific communication, which ideas must eventually enter if they are to be critiqued and tested against observations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信