Hongyong Fu , Yifeng Lei , Shuguang Zhang , Kexin Zhao , Yanlu Zhao
{"title":"Unravelling the carbon emissions compliance in sustainable supply chains: The impacts of carbon audit cooperation","authors":"Hongyong Fu , Yifeng Lei , Shuguang Zhang , Kexin Zhao , Yanlu Zhao","doi":"10.1016/j.omega.2024.103143","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>As one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, reducing carbon emissions is crucial to combat climate change. It has also prompted companies to comply with emission regulations and evaluate the environmental impacts of their supply chains. Yet, news and reports occasionally highlight industrial instances of noncompliance. In particular, supplier’s noncompliance is often mistakenly attributed to its downstream manufacturers. Due to this misconception, manufacturers might conduct audits to protect their reputation and sales. Moreover, because a supplier may provide components to multiple competing manufacturers, they may collaborate to share audit findings regarding the common supplier’s compliance with carbon emissions regulations. However, studies do not reveal how this audit cooperation affects stakeholder interests. Here, we introduce a stylised model to examine the effects of carbon audit cooperation on the environment, competing manufacturers, and their supplier. We identify two main effects: the <em>free-riding</em> and <em>amplifying</em> effects. The former benefits the supplier but harms the environment and competing manufacturers, while the latter presents the opposite effect. The net impact depends on the balance between these two effects, which challenges conventional beliefs about carbon emissions compliance and highlights the importance of sustainability in the industry. Finally, we explore various extensions to validate the robustness of our findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19529,"journal":{"name":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 103143"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Omega-international Journal of Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305048324001099","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
As one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals, reducing carbon emissions is crucial to combat climate change. It has also prompted companies to comply with emission regulations and evaluate the environmental impacts of their supply chains. Yet, news and reports occasionally highlight industrial instances of noncompliance. In particular, supplier’s noncompliance is often mistakenly attributed to its downstream manufacturers. Due to this misconception, manufacturers might conduct audits to protect their reputation and sales. Moreover, because a supplier may provide components to multiple competing manufacturers, they may collaborate to share audit findings regarding the common supplier’s compliance with carbon emissions regulations. However, studies do not reveal how this audit cooperation affects stakeholder interests. Here, we introduce a stylised model to examine the effects of carbon audit cooperation on the environment, competing manufacturers, and their supplier. We identify two main effects: the free-riding and amplifying effects. The former benefits the supplier but harms the environment and competing manufacturers, while the latter presents the opposite effect. The net impact depends on the balance between these two effects, which challenges conventional beliefs about carbon emissions compliance and highlights the importance of sustainability in the industry. Finally, we explore various extensions to validate the robustness of our findings.
期刊介绍:
Omega reports on developments in management, including the latest research results and applications. Original contributions and review articles describe the state of the art in specific fields or functions of management, while there are shorter critical assessments of particular management techniques. Other features of the journal are the "Memoranda" section for short communications and "Feedback", a correspondence column. Omega is both stimulating reading and an important source for practising managers, specialists in management services, operational research workers and management scientists, management consultants, academics, students and research personnel throughout the world. The material published is of high quality and relevance, written in a manner which makes it accessible to all of this wide-ranging readership. Preference will be given to papers with implications to the practice of management. Submissions of purely theoretical papers are discouraged. The review of material for publication in the journal reflects this aim.