Remedying driving range and refueling challenges in electric mobility: Consumer adoption of battery-swappable electric vehicles

IF 10.1 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES
Gibbson Adu-Gyamfi , Huaming Song , Emmanuel Nketiah , Bright Obuobi , Ammishaddai Kotey Djanie
{"title":"Remedying driving range and refueling challenges in electric mobility: Consumer adoption of battery-swappable electric vehicles","authors":"Gibbson Adu-Gyamfi ,&nbsp;Huaming Song ,&nbsp;Emmanuel Nketiah ,&nbsp;Bright Obuobi ,&nbsp;Ammishaddai Kotey Djanie","doi":"10.1016/j.techsoc.2024.102661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Driving range (mileage) limitations and long charging times associated with electric vehicle (EV) usage have necessitated the emergence of battery-swappable electric vehicles (BSEV) for sustainable mobility. In enhancing BSEV proliferation, a thorough comprehension of consumer adoption is needed. Understanding consumer adoption or hesitancy of BSEV is important for environmental sustainability. Consequently, this study explores the adoption intention of BSEVs by extending an amalgamated technology acceptance model (TAM) and the innovation resistance theory (IRT) with knowledge. Using 552 responses obtained through a survey, hypotheses were assessed using a structural equation model (SEM). Results from the study expressed that the conceptual framework explained 70.2 % of the overall variance, better than the individual TAM (40.7 %) and IRT (20.2 %), as well as the integrated model (60.7 %). Perceived ease-of-use, attitude, and perceived usefulness were positive in influencing BSEV. Value barrier and usage barrier were negatively significant in influencing BSEV adoption intention. However, the barrier of risk was insignificant in affecting the adoption intention of BSEVs. Tradition and image barriers were negative in influencing attitude. Perceived usefulness and attitude were discovered as mediators. This research provides policymakers and stakeholders with apt recommendations to promote acceptance and mitigate BSEV adoption hesitancy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47979,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Society","volume":"78 ","pages":"Article 102661"},"PeriodicalIF":10.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160791X24002094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Driving range (mileage) limitations and long charging times associated with electric vehicle (EV) usage have necessitated the emergence of battery-swappable electric vehicles (BSEV) for sustainable mobility. In enhancing BSEV proliferation, a thorough comprehension of consumer adoption is needed. Understanding consumer adoption or hesitancy of BSEV is important for environmental sustainability. Consequently, this study explores the adoption intention of BSEVs by extending an amalgamated technology acceptance model (TAM) and the innovation resistance theory (IRT) with knowledge. Using 552 responses obtained through a survey, hypotheses were assessed using a structural equation model (SEM). Results from the study expressed that the conceptual framework explained 70.2 % of the overall variance, better than the individual TAM (40.7 %) and IRT (20.2 %), as well as the integrated model (60.7 %). Perceived ease-of-use, attitude, and perceived usefulness were positive in influencing BSEV. Value barrier and usage barrier were negatively significant in influencing BSEV adoption intention. However, the barrier of risk was insignificant in affecting the adoption intention of BSEVs. Tradition and image barriers were negative in influencing attitude. Perceived usefulness and attitude were discovered as mediators. This research provides policymakers and stakeholders with apt recommendations to promote acceptance and mitigate BSEV adoption hesitancy.

解决电动汽车的行驶里程和加油难题:消费者采用可更换电池的电动汽车
由于电动汽车(EV)的行驶里程(里程数)有限且充电时间较长,因此有必要出现可更换电池的电动汽车(BSEV),以实现可持续交通。为了促进 BSEV 的普及,需要全面了解消费者的采用情况。了解消费者对 BSEV 的采用或犹豫不决对环境的可持续发展非常重要。因此,本研究通过对技术接受模型(TAM)和创新阻力理论(IRT)进行知识扩展,探讨了 BSEV 的采用意向。利用通过调查获得的 552 份答复,采用结构方程模型(SEM)对假设进行了评估。研究结果表明,概念框架解释了 70.2% 的总体变异,优于单独的 TAM(40.7%)和 IRT(20.2%)以及综合模型(60.7%)。感知易用性、态度和感知有用性对 BSEV 有积极影响。价值障碍和使用障碍对 BSEV 采用意向的影响呈负相关。然而,风险障碍对 BSEV 的采用意向影响不大。传统和形象障碍对态度的影响为负。感知有用性和态度被认为是中介因素。这项研究为政策制定者和利益相关者提供了适当的建议,以促进对生物安全评价工具的接受并减轻采用生物安全评价工具的犹豫不决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.90
自引率
14.10%
发文量
316
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Technology in Society is a global journal dedicated to fostering discourse at the crossroads of technological change and the social, economic, business, and philosophical transformation of our world. The journal aims to provide scholarly contributions that empower decision-makers to thoughtfully and intentionally navigate the decisions shaping this dynamic landscape. A common thread across these fields is the role of technology in society, influencing economic, political, and cultural dynamics. Scholarly work in Technology in Society delves into the social forces shaping technological decisions and the societal choices regarding technology use. This encompasses scholarly and theoretical approaches (history and philosophy of science and technology, technology forecasting, economic growth, and policy, ethics), applied approaches (business innovation, technology management, legal and engineering), and developmental perspectives (technology transfer, technology assessment, and economic development). Detailed information about the journal's aims and scope on specific topics can be found in Technology in Society Briefings, accessible via our Special Issues and Article Collections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信