Efficiency and technological gap ratios of the agroforestry production in the rural areas of Kaduna state, Nigeria: the implication for environmental resource management

O. Alabi, Abdulsamad Momoh, Hassan Isah, Jeremiah Aluwong, Paul Atteh, D. Ajibare, J. Bayei, Sarah Okoh, Tosin Olawoye, Shehu Ahmed, Babaranti Olumuyiwa
{"title":"Efficiency and technological gap ratios of the agroforestry production in the rural areas of Kaduna state, Nigeria: the implication for environmental resource management","authors":"O. Alabi, Abdulsamad Momoh, Hassan Isah, Jeremiah Aluwong, Paul Atteh, D. Ajibare, J. Bayei, Sarah Okoh, Tosin Olawoye, Shehu Ahmed, Babaranti Olumuyiwa","doi":"10.22620/agrisci.2024.41.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study evaluated the efficiency and the technological gap ratios (TGRs) of the agroforestry production in the rural areas of Kaduna State, Nigeria and discussed the implication for environmental resource management. A multi-stage sampling technique was used. A total number of 120 respondents comprising of 62 (51.67%) male agroforestry farmers and 58 (48.33%) female agroforestry farmers were selected. The primary data were collected based on a well-structured and a well-designed questionnaire. The data were analyzed using the following tools: descriptive statistics, the stochastic production efficiency frontier model, the stochastic meta-efficiency frontier model, and the principal component model. Farm size, labor input, chemical input, fertilizer input, and agroforestry tree density positively contribute to the output of male and female agroforestry farmers as well as pooled data respectively. The average agroforestry farmers achieve 83.1% (male), 64.7% (female) and 72.8% (pooled) of their frontier output given their present technologies. In other words, agroforestry farms lose 16.9%, 35.3% and 27.2% of their maximum potentials output to inefficiencies. The mean technical efficiency relative to the meta-frontier was estimated to be 74%, 47% and 59% for the male and female agroforestry farmers and the pooled data respectively. Based on the estimated technological gap ratios (TGRs) of 90%, 73% and 82% for the male and female agroforestry farmers and the pooled data respectively, the average male and female agroforestry farmers and the pooled data could be more technically efficient by increasing their output and closing the gaps of 10%, 27% and 18% respectively. The study recommended that farmers should be educated about the benefits of the agroforestry production technologies. Keywords: economics, technology gap ratios, agroforestry production, stochastic meta – efficiency frontier model, gender, rural areas, resource management, Nigeria","PeriodicalId":7600,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural sciences","volume":"44 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22620/agrisci.2024.41.010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluated the efficiency and the technological gap ratios (TGRs) of the agroforestry production in the rural areas of Kaduna State, Nigeria and discussed the implication for environmental resource management. A multi-stage sampling technique was used. A total number of 120 respondents comprising of 62 (51.67%) male agroforestry farmers and 58 (48.33%) female agroforestry farmers were selected. The primary data were collected based on a well-structured and a well-designed questionnaire. The data were analyzed using the following tools: descriptive statistics, the stochastic production efficiency frontier model, the stochastic meta-efficiency frontier model, and the principal component model. Farm size, labor input, chemical input, fertilizer input, and agroforestry tree density positively contribute to the output of male and female agroforestry farmers as well as pooled data respectively. The average agroforestry farmers achieve 83.1% (male), 64.7% (female) and 72.8% (pooled) of their frontier output given their present technologies. In other words, agroforestry farms lose 16.9%, 35.3% and 27.2% of their maximum potentials output to inefficiencies. The mean technical efficiency relative to the meta-frontier was estimated to be 74%, 47% and 59% for the male and female agroforestry farmers and the pooled data respectively. Based on the estimated technological gap ratios (TGRs) of 90%, 73% and 82% for the male and female agroforestry farmers and the pooled data respectively, the average male and female agroforestry farmers and the pooled data could be more technically efficient by increasing their output and closing the gaps of 10%, 27% and 18% respectively. The study recommended that farmers should be educated about the benefits of the agroforestry production technologies. Keywords: economics, technology gap ratios, agroforestry production, stochastic meta – efficiency frontier model, gender, rural areas, resource management, Nigeria
尼日利亚卡杜纳州农村地区农林业生产的效率和技术差距比:对环境资源管理的影响
本研究评估了尼日利亚卡杜纳州农村地区农林业生产的效率和技术差距比(TGRs),并讨论了对环境资源管理的影响。研究采用了多阶段抽样技术。共选取了 120 名受访者,其中包括 62 名(51.67%)男性农林业农民和 58 名(48.33%)女性农林业农民。原始数据是根据结构合理、设计精良的调查问卷收集的。数据分析采用了以下工具:描述性统计、随机生产效率前沿模型、随机元效率前沿模型和主成分模型。农场规模、劳动力投入、化学品投入、化肥投入和农林业树木密度分别对男性和女性农林业农户的产出以及汇总数据产生了正向影响。在现有技术条件下,农林业农户的平均产量分别达到其前沿产量的 83.1%(男性)、64.7%(女性)和 72.8%(汇总)。换言之,农林业农场因效率低下分别损失了 16.9%、35.3% 和 27.2%的最大潜在产出。男性和女性农林业农场主的平均技术效率相对于元前沿的估计值分别为 74%、47% 和 59%。根据男性和女性农林业农民以及汇总数据的技术差距比(TGRs)分别为 90%、73% 和 82%的估计值,男性和女性农林业农民以及汇总数据的平均技术效率可以通过提高产量来提高,并分别缩小 10%、27% 和 18% 的差距。研究建议,应向农民宣传农林业生产技术的益处。关键词:经济学;技术差距比;农林业生产;随机元-效率前沿模型;性别;农村地区;资源管理;尼日利亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信