On Editor’s Instructions to Manuscript Reviewers

IF 1.2 4区管理学 N/A HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Journal of Scholarly Publishing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.3138/jsp-2023-0082

R. L. Lyman

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three to four decades ago an editor’s instructions to manuscript reviewers requested that reviewers focus on evaluating the quality and significance of the author’s research. Recent instructions now include things a reviewer should not do, such as not concerning oneself with manuscript formatting, not correcting typographical errors, and not correcting grammar. If sloppy formatting, typographical errors, and poor grammar detract from the quality and significance of the author’s research, the reviewer must comment on these attributes, particularly when these things detract from evaluating the quality and significance of the research described.

查看原文本刊更多论文

关于编辑对审稿人的指示

三四十年前，编辑给审稿人的指示要求审稿人重点评价作者研究的质量和意义。现在，最新的说明包括审稿人不应该做的事情，比如不关心稿件格式、不纠正排版错误、不修改语法。如果格式马虎、排版错误和语法错误有损于作者研究的质量和意义，审稿人必须对这些问题进行评论，尤其是当这些问题有损于评估所描述研究的质量和意义时。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Scholarly Publishing Multiple-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

15.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： For more than 40 years, the Journal of Scholarly Publishing has been the authoritative voice of academic publishing. The journal combines philosophical analysis with practical advice and aspires to explain, argue, discuss, and question the large collection of new topics that continually arise in the publishing field. JSP has also examined the future of scholarly publishing, scholarship on the web, digitization, copyright, editorial policies, computer applications, marketing, and pricing models. It is the indispensable resource for academics and publishers that addresses the new challenges resulting from changes in technology and funding and from innovations in production and publishing.

文献相关原料

公司名称	产品信息	采购帮参考价格