{"title":"On the Fall of the Angels: Economic Theology after the Middle Passage","authors":"Sean Capener","doi":"10.1086/730367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article engages recent readings of Anselm of Canterbury’s Cur Deus homo that highlight the centrality of debt and indebtedness for his economy of salvation. In the rush to establish homologies between Anselm’s theological economy and neoliberal governance, readers have tended to focus on Anselm’s insistence that debt must be repaid. Highlighting the specifically involuntary character of the debt described by Anselm, as well as Anselm’s digression into the irredeemable status of damned angels, this article argues that Anselm’s continuing relevance is best understood not in light of the general predicaments faced by borrowers but in light of the racial calculus and moral economy that characterize the afterlife of Atlantic chattel slavery. The popularity and persistence of accounts of atonement modeled on Anselm’s, it claims, raise questions about both the Christianity of contemporary antiblackness and the antiblackness of contemporary Christianity.","PeriodicalId":513119,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Religion","volume":"6 3","pages":"257 - 281"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/730367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article engages recent readings of Anselm of Canterbury’s Cur Deus homo that highlight the centrality of debt and indebtedness for his economy of salvation. In the rush to establish homologies between Anselm’s theological economy and neoliberal governance, readers have tended to focus on Anselm’s insistence that debt must be repaid. Highlighting the specifically involuntary character of the debt described by Anselm, as well as Anselm’s digression into the irredeemable status of damned angels, this article argues that Anselm’s continuing relevance is best understood not in light of the general predicaments faced by borrowers but in light of the racial calculus and moral economy that characterize the afterlife of Atlantic chattel slavery. The popularity and persistence of accounts of atonement modeled on Anselm’s, it claims, raise questions about both the Christianity of contemporary antiblackness and the antiblackness of contemporary Christianity.
本文结合最近对坎特伯雷的安瑟伦的《Cur Deus homo》的解读,强调债务和负债在其救赎经济中的核心地位。在急于在安瑟伦的神学经济与新自由主义治理之间建立同源关系的过程中,读者往往关注安瑟伦坚持债务必须偿还的观点。本文强调了安瑟伦所描述的债务的特殊非自愿性,以及安瑟伦对被诅咒的天使的不可救赎地位的离题,认为对安瑟伦的持续相关性的最好理解,不是从借款人所面临的一般困境来看,而是从大西洋动产奴隶制的来世所特有的种族计算和道德经济来看。文章称,以安瑟伦的赎罪论为蓝本的论述的流行和持续,提出了当代反黑人基督教和当代反黑人基督教的问题。