Environmental Monitoring of Land Use/ Land Cover by Integrating Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms

Firas Aljanabi, M. Dedeoğlu, C. Şeker
{"title":"Environmental Monitoring of Land Use/ Land Cover by Integrating Remote Sensing and Machine Learning Algorithms","authors":"Firas Aljanabi, M. Dedeoğlu, C. Şeker","doi":"10.31272/jeasd.28.4.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Evaluation of the land use/ land cover (LULC) case over large regions is very important in a variety of domains, including natural resources such as soil, water, etc., and climate change risks and LULC change has emerged as a high anxiety for the environment. Therefore, we tested and compared the performance of three classification algorithms: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Trees (RT), and Maximum Likelihood (MaxL) to derive and extract LULC information for the district of Sarayönü/ Konya across five distinct classes: water, plantation, grassland, built-up, and bare land. Two remote sensing indices, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the normalized difference water index (NDWI), were used as supplementary inputs for the classification of LULC. To evaluate the performance of the algorithms, a confusion matrix was employed. The average overall accuracy of support vector machines, random trees, and maximum likelihood algorithms was found 85.60%, 79.20%, and 74.80%, respectively, and 82.00%, 74.00%, and 68.50% for the Kappa coefficient. These results indicate that the support vector machines algorithm outperforms other algorithms in terms of accuracy. As a result of the research, it was determined that classification algorithms integrated with remote sensing in LULC change monitoring/determination could produce accurate classification maps that can be used as base data. This is due to the ability of machine learning algorithms to learn complex patterns, adapt to diverse data, and continuously improve, making them achieve higher accuracy compared to traditional classifiers. Therefore, their use was recommended for decision-makers.","PeriodicalId":33282,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development","volume":"7 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering and Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31272/jeasd.28.4.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Evaluation of the land use/ land cover (LULC) case over large regions is very important in a variety of domains, including natural resources such as soil, water, etc., and climate change risks and LULC change has emerged as a high anxiety for the environment. Therefore, we tested and compared the performance of three classification algorithms: Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Trees (RT), and Maximum Likelihood (MaxL) to derive and extract LULC information for the district of Sarayönü/ Konya across five distinct classes: water, plantation, grassland, built-up, and bare land. Two remote sensing indices, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the normalized difference water index (NDWI), were used as supplementary inputs for the classification of LULC. To evaluate the performance of the algorithms, a confusion matrix was employed. The average overall accuracy of support vector machines, random trees, and maximum likelihood algorithms was found 85.60%, 79.20%, and 74.80%, respectively, and 82.00%, 74.00%, and 68.50% for the Kappa coefficient. These results indicate that the support vector machines algorithm outperforms other algorithms in terms of accuracy. As a result of the research, it was determined that classification algorithms integrated with remote sensing in LULC change monitoring/determination could produce accurate classification maps that can be used as base data. This is due to the ability of machine learning algorithms to learn complex patterns, adapt to diverse data, and continuously improve, making them achieve higher accuracy compared to traditional classifiers. Therefore, their use was recommended for decision-makers.
通过整合遥感和机器学习算法对土地利用/土地覆盖进行环境监测
对大面积区域的土地利用/土地覆被情况进行评估在多个领域都非常重要,包括土壤、水等自然资源以及气候变化风险,而土地利用/土地覆被变化已成为环境的高度焦虑。因此,我们测试并比较了三种分类算法的性能:支持向量机 (SVM)、随机树 (RT) 和最大似然法 (MaxL) 三种分类算法的性能进行了测试和比较,以得出并提取萨拉约努/科尼亚地区的土地利用、土地利用变化(LULC)信息,包括五个不同的类别:水域、种植园、草地、建筑用地和裸露土地。归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)和归一化差异水指数(NDWI)这两个遥感指数被用作 LULC 分类的补充输入。为了评估算法的性能,采用了混淆矩阵。结果发现,支持向量机、随机树和最大似然算法的平均总体准确率分别为 85.60%、79.20% 和 74.80%,Kappa 系数分别为 82.00%、74.00% 和 68.50%。这些结果表明,支持向量机算法在准确性方面优于其他算法。研究结果表明,在土地利用、土地利用变化监测/判定中结合遥感技术的分类算法可以生成准确的分类图,并可用作基础数据。这是由于机器学习算法能够学习复杂的模式,适应不同的数据,并不断改进,使其与传统分类器相比获得更高的准确性。因此,建议决策者使用这些算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
50 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信