Does corporate governance assurance decrease the agency conflict? The role of auditor opinion: Evidence from an emerging market

Mostafa Kayed Abdelazeem Mohamed
{"title":"Does corporate governance assurance decrease the agency conflict? The role of auditor opinion: Evidence from an emerging market","authors":"Mostafa Kayed Abdelazeem Mohamed","doi":"10.21608/cfdj.2023.249005.1854","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": - Objective: This paper aims to examine the impact of corporate governance (CG) internal mechanisms on the external auditor opinion regarding the assurance of corporate governance report - Design and Methodology: The sample used in the current research incorporates all companies listed in EGX from the period 2018 till 2020. The final sample comprises all corporate governance reports, management reports and auditors’ reports in the covered period with 550 observations. Statistical analysis is performed using multivariate regression through performing logistic regression as it fits the dichotomous dependent variable. - Findings and Recommendations : The results revealed a positive significant relationship between audit committee existence, audit committee independence and auditors’ opinion. Further, CEO rule duality and executives in audit committee were found to have negative insignificant impact on auditor opinion. Finally, board independence was found to have positive insignificant impact on auditors’ opinion. Future research can focus on the impact of the auditor report on CG on stock prices and the cost of capital. - Originality and Value","PeriodicalId":176283,"journal":{"name":"المجلة العلمية للدراسات والبحوث المالية والتجارية","volume":"15 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"المجلة العلمية للدراسات والبحوث المالية والتجارية","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/cfdj.2023.249005.1854","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: - Objective: This paper aims to examine the impact of corporate governance (CG) internal mechanisms on the external auditor opinion regarding the assurance of corporate governance report - Design and Methodology: The sample used in the current research incorporates all companies listed in EGX from the period 2018 till 2020. The final sample comprises all corporate governance reports, management reports and auditors’ reports in the covered period with 550 observations. Statistical analysis is performed using multivariate regression through performing logistic regression as it fits the dichotomous dependent variable. - Findings and Recommendations : The results revealed a positive significant relationship between audit committee existence, audit committee independence and auditors’ opinion. Further, CEO rule duality and executives in audit committee were found to have negative insignificant impact on auditor opinion. Finally, board independence was found to have positive insignificant impact on auditors’ opinion. Future research can focus on the impact of the auditor report on CG on stock prices and the cost of capital. - Originality and Value
公司治理保证会减少代理冲突吗?审计师意见的作用:新兴市场的证据
目标:本文旨在研究公司治理(CG)内部机制对外部审计师对公司治理报告保证意见的影响 - 设计与方法:本次研究使用的样本包括 2018 年至 2020 年期间在 EGX 上市的所有公司。最终样本包括所涉期间的所有公司治理报告、管理报告和审计报告,共 550 个观察点。由于符合二分因变量,因此使用逻辑回归进行多元回归进行统计分析。- 研究结果和建议研究结果表明,审计委员会的存在、审计委员会的独立性与审计师的意见之间存在正相关关系。此外,审计委员会中的首席执行官双重规则和高管对审计师意见的影响为负,且不显著。最后,研究发现董事会独立性对审计师意见的影响为正,但不显著。未来的研究可以重点关注企业管治审计报告对股票价格和资本成本的影响。- 原创性和价值
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信